<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0872-1904</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Port. Electrochim. Acta]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0872-1904</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedade Portuguesa de Electroquímica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0872-19042014000200001</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4152/pea.201402077</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Quantum Chemical Studies and Corrosion Inhibitive Properties of Mild Steel by Some Pyridine Derivatives in 1 N HCl Solution]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elmsellem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Basbas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chetouani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aouniti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Radi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Messali]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Université Mohammed Premier Faculté des Sciences Laboratory of Applied Chemistry and Environment (LCAE-URAC18)]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oujda Morocco]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centre Régionale des Métiés de l'Education et de Formation CRMEF Laboratoire de chimie physique ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oujda ]]></addr-line>
<country>Morocco</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Université Mohamed I Centre de l'Oriental des Sciences et Technologies de l'Eau (COSTE) ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oujda ]]></addr-line>
<country>Morocco</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A04">
<institution><![CDATA[,Taibah University Faculty of Science Chemistry Department]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Al-Madina Al-Mounawara ]]></addr-line>
<country>Saudi Arabia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>77</fpage>
<lpage>108</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0872-19042014000200001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0872-19042014000200001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0872-19042014000200001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The influence of 2,6-bis-(hydroxy)-pyridine (P1), 2,6-bis-(chloro)-pyridine (P2) and diethyl 1,1'-(pyridine-2,6-diyl)bis(5-methyl-1H-pyrazol2-3-carboxylate ( P3) on the corrosion of steel in 1 N HCl solution has been studied by weight loss measurements, potentiodynamic and impedance spectroscopy methods. The inhibiting action increases with the concentration of these compounds to attain 91,5% at 10-3 M for P3. We note good agreement between gravimetric and electrochemical methods. The polarisation measurements show also that the pyridines act essentially as mixed inhibitors and the cathodic curves indicate that the reduction of proton at the steel surface happens with an activating mechanism. The temperature effect on the corrosion behaviour of iron in 1 M HCl without and with these inhibitors at different concentrations was studied in the temperature range from 313 to 353 K, and allows deducing the apparent activation energy, enthalpy and entropy of the dissolution process and the free energy were determined and discussed. The inhibitors were adsorbed on the iron surface according to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model at different temperatures and some thermodynamic data for the adsorption process are calculated. The experimental study has been finished by quantum theoretical study; the quantum chemical calculations, based on DFT methods at B3LYP/6-31G** level of theory, were performed, by means of the GAUSSIAN 03 set of programs. Structural parameters, such as the frontier molecular orbital energies (E HOMO and E LUMO), gap of energy &#916;E, charge distribution, absolute hardness &#951; and softens &#963;, fraction of electrons &#916;N transferred from pyridine molecules to steel, as well as electronic parameters such as Mulliken atomic populations have been determined. The objective of this quantum theoretical treatment is to attempt to find relationships between their molecular and electronic structures and inhibition efficiency.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pyridine]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Inhibition]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Corrosion]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Steel]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Acid]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[quantum chemical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[DFT methods]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[B3LYP/6-31G base]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[GAUSSIAN 03]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[   <!--     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>doi: 10.4152/pea.201402077</p> -->      <p><b>Quantum Chemical Studies and Corrosion Inhibitive Properties of Mild Steel by Some Pyridine Derivatives in 1 N HCl Solution</b></p>      <p> <b>H. Elmsellem</b><sup><i>a</i></sup> , <b>N. Basbas</b><sup><i>a</i></sup> , <b>A. Chetouani</b><sup><i>a</i></sup></b> , <b>A. Aouniti</b><sup><i>b</i></sup></b> , <b>S. Radi</b><sup><i>a,c</i></sup></b> , <b>M. Messali</b><sup><i>d</i></sup></b>  and <b>B. Hammouti</b><sup><i>a,d</i>,<a href="#0">*</a></sup> </p>      <p><i><sup>a</sup> Laboratory of Applied Chemistry and Environment (LCAE-URAC18), Facult&eacute; des Sciences, Universit&eacute; Mohammed Premier, B.P. 717, M-60000 Oujda, Morocco</i></p>      <p><i><sup>b</sup> Laboratoire de chimie physique, Centre R&eacute;gionale des M&eacute;ti&eacute;s de l'Education et de Formation CRMEF, R&eacute;gion de l'Orientale, M-60000 Oujda, Morocco</i></p>      <p><i><sup>c</sup> Centre de l'Oriental des Sciences et Technologies de l'Eau (COSTE), Universit&eacute; Mohamed I, Oujda, Morocco</i></p>      <p><i><sup>d</sup> Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, 30002 Al-Madina Al-Mounawara, Saudi Arabia</i></p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Abstract</b></p>      <p>The influence of 2,6-bis-(hydroxy)-pyridine (P1), 2,6-bis-(chloro)-pyridine (P2) and diethyl  1,1'-(pyridine-2,6-diyl)bis(5-methyl-1H-pyrazol2-3-carboxylate ( P3) on the corrosion of steel  in 1 N HCl solution has been studied by weight loss measurements, potentiodynamic and  impedance spectroscopy methods. The inhibiting action increases with the concentration of  these compounds to attain 91,5% at 10<sup>-3</sup> M for P3. We note good agreement between  gravimetric and electrochemical methods. The polarisation measurements show also that the  pyridines act essentially as mixed inhibitors and the cathodic curves indicate that the reduction  of proton at the steel surface happens with an activating mechanism. The temperature effect on  the corrosion behaviour of iron in 1 M HCl without and with these inhibitors at different  concentrations was studied in the temperature range from 313 to 353 K, and allows deducing  the apparent activation energy, enthalpy and entropy of the dissolution process and the free  energy were determined and discussed. The inhibitors were adsorbed on the iron surface  according to the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model at different temperatures and some  thermodynamic data for the adsorption process are calculated. The experimental study has been  finished by quantum theoretical study; the quantum chemical calculations, based on DFT  methods at B3LYP/6-31G** level of theory, were performed, by means of the GAUSSIAN 03  set of programs. Structural parameters, such as the frontier molecular orbital energies (E<sub>HOMO</sub>  and E<sub>LUMO</sub>), gap of energy &Delta;E, charge distribution, absolute hardness &eta; and softens &sigma;, fraction of  electrons &Delta;N transferred from pyridine molecules to steel, as well as electronic parameters such  as Mulliken atomic populations have been determined. The objective of this quantum theoretical  treatment is to attempt to find relationships between their molecular and electronic structures  and inhibition efficiency.</p>      <p><b><i>Keywords:</i></b> Pyridine, Inhibition, Corrosion, Steel, Acid, quantum chemical, DFT methods,  B3LYP/6-31G base, GAUSSIAN 03.</p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Introduction</b></p>      <p>Chemical acid cleaning, acid descaling and pickling processes are widely used in  industrial processes to remove mill corrosion scales (oxide scales) from metallic  surface in high concentrated HCl media at elevated temperature up to 60 &deg;C.  Corrosion never stops but its scope and severity can be lessened. The cost of  corrosion has been reported from many studies as to be of the order of 1% to 5%  of GNP for any country. In a sense, the use of inhibitors is one of the best known  methods of corrosion protection. The addition of the inhibitor is necessary to  avoid the attack on the metal and should be effective even under severe  conditions in concentrated acid. The selection of a suitable inhibitor depends on  its chemical structure, concentration, nature of the metal and on the type of acid.  The selection of this inhibitor is based also on the fact that it contains a ring as  reactive centres through which it can be adsorbed readily on the metal surface. It  is readily soluble in the medium and it does not cause any health hazards, hence  its use as corrosion inhibitor is safe. So, the inhibition efficiency of organic  compounds depends on the structure of the inhibitor, the characteristics of the  environment in which it acts and the mode of interaction with the metal surface.  Organic compounds containing electronegative functional groups and p-electron  in triple or conjugated double bonds are usually goods inhibitors. It was shown  that the protective properties of such compound depend upon their ability to  reduce the corrosion rate and are enhanced at higher electron densities around the  oxygen and nitrogen atom, which are the major adsorption centres [1, 2]. In acid  environment, the inhibitor acts generally by chemisorption and/or physical  adsorption at the metal surface. To be effective, an inhibitor must also displace  water molecules from the metal's surface and interact with anodic and cathodic  reaction sites to retard the oxidation and/or reduction corrosion reaction.</p>      <p>It is widely accepted that organic inhibitors exhibit corrosion via adsorption. The  inhibition mechanism is a separation process involving (i) the inhibitor is  adsorbed on the surface of the metal forming a compact protective thin layer and  (ii) the inhibitor forms a precipitate on the surface of the metal, acting on the  aggressive media to form protective precipitates or remove the aggressive agents  [20]. Adsorption can also be described by two main types of interaction, which  are physisorption and chemisorption, where [21, 22]:</p>      <p>Physisorption: involves electrostatic forces between ionic charges or dipoles on  the adsorbed species and the electric charge at the metal/solution interface. The  heat of adsorption is low, thus, this adsorption is only stable at relatively low  temperature.</p>      <p>Chemisorption: involves charge transfer or sharing from the inhibitor molecules  to the metal surface to form a coordinate type bond. This type of adsorption is  known to have much stronger adsorption energy compared to the other mode of  adsorption. Thus, such bond is more stable at higher temperatures.</p>      <p>Adsorption is generally explained by the formation of an adsorptive film of a  physical or chemical character on the metal surface. In continuation of our work  on development of organic compounds as acid inhibitors, we have synthesised an  organic inhibitor namely 2,6-Bis-(hydroxy)-pyridine (P1), 2,6-Bis-(chloro)pyridine  (P2) and diethyl 1,1'-(pyridine-2,6-diyl)bis(5-methyl-1H-pyrazol2-3carboxylate  (P3), present in <a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a>.</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f1"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f1.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The synthesis of new organic molecules  offers various molecular structures containing several heteroatoms and  substituents. Weight loss tests and electrochemical techniques have been used to  study the effect of addition of this compound on the corrosion of steel in HCl  acid solution with a view to study it's inhibiting properties on corrosion of steel  in 1 N HCl in the 298-353 K range. Furthermore, quantum chemical calculations  have been performed at B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level to complement the  experimental evidence. We aim to investigate whether there is a clear  relationship between the experimentally determined inhibition efficiencies of the  studied inhibitors. A number of quantum-chemical parameters are directly  extracted from the output files (E<sub>HOMO</sub>, E<sub>LUMO</sub>, &mu;), when other parameters need to  be computed separately (IP, EA, &Delta;E, &chi;, &eta;, &sigma;  and &Delta;N).</p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Experimental</b></p>      <p><b><i>Inhibitors</i></b></p>      <p>The chlorination of the commercially available P1 carried out in dichloromethane  and thionyl chloride gave the compound P2 with a good yield (87 %). One  equivalent of the last product P2 was condensed with two equivalents of 3(5)carboxymethyl- 5(3)-methylpyrazole under solid-liquid phase transfer catalysis to  favour the a-isomer. Thus, one isolated major product P3 in 72% as the aaisomer  was formed. The synthesis of target products was illustrated in <a href="#s1">scheme 1</a>  and the characterization is presented in spectra <a href="#s2">1</a>, <a href="#s3">2</a> and <a href="#s4">3</a>, <a href="#s5">4</a> respectively for P2  and P3.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="s1"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01s1.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="s2"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01s2.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="s3"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01s3.jpg">     
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="s4"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01s4.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="s5"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01s5.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The analytical and spectroscopic data are conforming to the structures of the  compounds formed. For 2,6-bis(chloromethyl)pyridine (P2) (<a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a>): Yield 87%.  <sup>1</sup>H RMN (300MHz, CDCl<sub>3</sub>) &delta; ppm: 4.65 (s, 4H, Cl-CH2-), 7.42 (d, 2H, H<sub>meta</sub>),  7.76 (d, 2H, Hpara). <sup>13</sup>C RMN (75 MHz, CDCl<sub>3</sub>) &delta; ppm: 46.24 (Cl-CH2-), 122.23  (C<sub>ortho</sub>), 138.38 (C<sub>meta</sub>), 156.25 (C<sub>para</sub>). Anal. Calcd. for C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>7</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>N: C 47.76,  H 4.01, N 7.96, Found: C 47.79, H 4.08, N 7.88; m/z (M<sup>+</sup>): 175.</p>      <p>For ethyl1-((6-((3-(ethoxycarbonyl)-5-methyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)methyl)pyridin-2yl) methyl)-5-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylate (P3) (<a href="#f1">Fig. 1</a>): Yield 72%. 1H  RMN (300MHz, CDCl<sub>3</sub>) &delta; ppm: 1.31 (t, 6H, CH2-CH3), 2.16 (s, 6H, pyrazolCH3),  4.32 (q, 4H , CH2-CH3), 5.43 (s, 4H, N-CH2-), 6.56 (s, 2H, pyrazol, CH),  6,80 (d, 2H, H<sub>meta</sub>), 7.53 (d, 2H, H<sub>para</sub>). <sup>13</sup>C RMN (75 MHz, CDCl<sub>3</sub>) &delta;  ppm: 11.18 (Et), 11.27 (Et), 54.78 (N-CH2), 60.85 (CH2-Py), 108.76 (Py), 120.53 (Py),  138.66 (Py), 140.88 (Bz), 143.15 (Bz), 162.44 (Bz). Anal. Calcd. for  C<sub>21</sub>H<sub>25</sub>N<sub>5</sub>O<sub>4</sub>: C 61.30, H 6.12, N 17.02, Found: C 61.29, H 6.15, N  7.07; m/z (M<sup>+</sup>): 411.4.</p>       <p><b><i>Gravimetric, polarisation and impedance spectroscopy measurements</i></b></p>      <p>Prior to all measurements, the steel samples (0.09 % P; 0.38 % Si; 0.01 % Al;  0.05 % Mn; 0.21 % C; 0.05 % S and the remainder iron) were ground with  different emery papers up to 1000 grade, washed thoroughly with bidistilled  water, degreased and dried with acetone.</p>      <p>The aggressive solution (1 N HCl) was prepared by dilution of analytical grade  37% HCl with bidistilled water.</p>      <p>Gravimetric measurements were carried out in a double walled glass cell  equipped with a thermostat-cooling condenser. The solution volume was 100  cm 3. The steel specimens used had a rectangular form (2 cm &times; 2 cm &times; 0.05 cm).  The electrolysis cell was a cylinder of Pyrex closed by a cap containing five  openings. Three of them were used for the electrodes. The working electrode was  mild steel with the surface area of 1 cm<sup>2</sup>. Before each experiment, the electrode  was polished using emery paper until 1200 grade. After this, the electrode was  cleaned ultrasonically with distillate water. A saturated calomel electrode (SCE)  was used as a reference electrode. All potentials were given with reference to this  electrode. The counter electrode was a platinum plate of surface area of 1 cm<sup>2</sup>.  The temperature was thermostatically controlled at 298 &pm;  1 K. The working electrode was immersed in the test solution during 30 minutes until a steady state  open circuit potential (E<sub>ocp</sub>) was obtained. The polarization curve was recorded  by polarization from -800 mV to 100 mV under potentiodynamic conditions  corresponding to 0.5 mV/s (sweep rate) and under air atmosphere.  The potentiodynamic measurements were carried out using a VoltaLab100  electrochemical analyser, which was controlled by a personal computer. AC- impedance studies also were carried out in a three electrode cell assembly. The  data were analysed using Voltamaster 4.0 software. The electrochemical  impedance spectra (EIS) were acquired in the frequency range 10 kHz to 1 NHz  at the free corrosion potential. The charge transfer resistance (R<sub>ct</sub>) and double  layer capacitance (C<sub>dl</sub>) were determined from Nyquist plots.</p>       <p><b><i>Quantum chemical calculations</i></b></p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Computational chemistry (also known as molecular modelling) is the application  of computer-based models to the simulation of chemical processes and the  computation of chemical properties. It accounts for roughly a third of the  supercomputer usage worldwide. However, improved desktop computers mean  that these methods are also becoming more available to scientists who are not  purely computation lists. According to a recent textbook, "Today, the situation  has been reached where, in many cases, the computational chemist can substitute  the computing machine for the test tubeâ€�. Computational chemistry is a valuable  tool for experimental chemists to bypass tedious, time consuming, costly, and  sometimes dangerous experiments. In the drug industry, computer design of  molecules with specified properties is now becoming more common.  Furthermore, computational chemistry allows one to investigate molecules that  are too unstable to be studied experimentally, to analyze quantities (such as  atomic charges) that are not experimentally observable, and to rectify incorrect  experimental assignments. Also, computational chemistry allows one to both  calculate certain quantities (such as heats of formation) with more accuracy than  can be determined experimentally (special cases only) and improve one's general  understanding of chemical phenomena.</p>      <p>The process of finding the arrangement of nuclei for which the potential energy  is a minimum is known as geometry optimization. The potential energy as a  function of internuclear distance for a diatomic molecule is shown in the diagram  below. Note that it takes a lot of energy to get atoms very close to each other;  there is a distance with minimum energy Ro, and it takes energy to pull the atoms  apart farther than Ro. Why does the energy approach zero as the intermolecular  distance gets very large? The lowest-energy is at Ro (equilibrium bond length),  where the derivative of the potential energy curve is zero. The geometry  optimization procedure involves making an initial guess for the geometry and  then calculating the derivative (gradient) of the potential energy with respect to  each of the nuclear coordinates. The gradient represents the force acting upon  each atom. These energy gradients are then used to obtain a new geometry that  is likely to be closer to the equilibrium geometry. This process is repeated until  the energy gradients (forces) approach zero, indicating that equilibrium geometry  has been found (<a href="#f2">Fig. 2</a>).</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f2"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f2.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>Recently, quantum chemical calculations have been performed enormously to  complement the experimental evidences. Quantum chemical methods and  molecular modelling techniques enable the definition of a large number of  molecular quantities characterizing the reactivity, shape and binding properties of  a complete molecule as well as of molecular fragments and substituents. Density  Functional Theory is another type of ab initio calculation that is much less  expensive (in terms of CPU time, memory, and disk space) than HF and QMC  because it is based on total electron density rather than wave functions. It is now  generally agreed that density functional theory provides the most promising  approach to accurate quantum chemical calculations for large systems. Ab initio  calculations are qualitatively good, and for very small molecules give excellent  quantitative results. The recently developed density functional theory (DFT)  quantum chemical calculations, with the Beck's three parameter exchange  functional along with the Lee-Yang-Parr nonlocal correlation functional  (B3LYP) [26-28] with 6-31G* basis set, is implemented in Gaussian 03  program package [29], have been applied widely to compute electronic properties  possibly relevant to the inhibition action.</p>      <p>This approach is shown to yield favourable geometries for a wide variety of  systems. This basis set gives good geometry optimizations. The geometry  structure was optimized under no constraint. Knowing the orientation of the  molecule, favourable configurations, atomic charges and steric and electronic  effects would be useful for better understanding of the inhibitor performance. It  has been stated that the experimental data can be correlated well with quantum  chemical parameters such as electron density, ionization potential, total energy,  dipole moment, charge density, highest occupied (HOMO) and lowest  unoccupied (LUMO) molecular orbital energies and the gap between them, the  absolute hardness &eta; and softens &sigma;, the fraction of electrons &Delta;N transferred from  pyridine molecules to steel as well as electronic parameters such as Mulliken  atomic populations.</p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Results and discussion</b></p>      <p><b><i>Weight loss tests</i></b></p>      <p>The gravimetric method (weight loss) is known to be the most widely used  method of monitoring inhibition efficiency. Mild steel specimens of dimension 4  &times; 3 &times; 0.1 cm were used in these studies. The specimens were weighed before and  after the tests using an analytical balance with a precision of 0.01 mg. The  specimens were taken out of immersion, washed, dried and reweighed accurately  to determine the weight loss of mild steel. The weight loss measurements were  carried out by weighing the prepared specimens before and after immersion for 6  h in 100 mL stagnant test solutions of 1 N HCl in the presence and absence of  various concentrations of 2,6-bis-(hydroxy)-pyridine (P1), 2,6-Bis-(chloro)pyridine  (P2) and diethyl 1,1'-(pyridine-2,6-diyl)bis(5-methyl-1H-pyrazol2-3-carboxylate  (P3) compounds tested at different concentrations.</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>From the weight loss data, the percentage inhibition efficiency, and maintained in  a thermostated water bath, (IEw%), was calculated at different concentrations and  at different temperatures by <a href="#e1">equation 1</a>, where W<sub>corr</sub> and W&deg;<sub>corr</sub> are the corrosion  rates of steel with and without organic compound, respectively.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e1"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e1.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p><a href="#t1">Table 1</a> regroups the results of weight loss of steel in 1 N HCl with and without  the addition of various concentrations of the pyridines compounds.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t1"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t1.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>It was found that the value of Ew% increases with an increase in the concentration of additives  compounds P1, P2 and P3, which confirmed that the number of molecules  adsorbed increased over the steel surface, locking the active sites from acid  attack and, thereby, protecting the metal from corrosion. At the highest  concentration of 10<sup>-3</sup> M of each additive studied, the Ew% attained was 67.07%,  89.02% and 91.46% for P1, P2 and P3, respectively, which confirmed that both  of the additives were very effective as inhibitors.</p>      <p>It is interesting to note that the inhibiting effect of P3 can be attributed to its  adsorption at the metal solution interface; the adsorption is owing to the presence  of more active centres (several nitrogen atoms and a great deal of &pi;-electrons of  rings) for adsorption with positively charged steel surface. It has been reported  that the nitrogen atoms are the adsorption centres for their interaction with the  metal surface and these compounds are usually good inhibitors.</p>       <p><b><i>Polarisation results</i></b></p>      <p>Polarization measurements have been carried out in order to gain knowledge  concerning the kinetics of the anodic and cathodic reactions. <a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a> shows the  influence of 2,6-Bis-(hydroxy)-pyridine (P1), 2,6-Bis-(chloro)-pyridine (P2) and  diethyl 1,1'-(pyridine-2,6-diyl)bis(5-methyl-1H-pyrazol2-3-carboxylate (P3)  concentration on the cathodic and anodic polarisation curves of steel in 1N HCl.</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f3"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f3.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>Evaluation of EI(%) can also be performed through electrochemical experiments  which consist of the determination of intensity/potential curves.</p>      <p>Various corrosion kinetic parameters such as corrosion current (I<sub>corr</sub>), corrosion  potential (E<sub>corr</sub>), cathodic Tafel slope (&beta;c) derived from the polarization curves,  <a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a>, and inhibition efficiencies (EI%) of P1, P2 and P3 are given in <a href="#t2">Table 2</a>.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t2"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t2.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>In the case of polarization method, the inhibition efficiency EI(%) is determined by  the <a href="#e2">relation 2</a>, where I<sub>corr</sub> and I<sup>0</sup><sub>corr</sub> are the corrosion current density values with  and without inhibitor, respectively, determined by extrapolation of the cathodic  Tafel lines to corrosion potential.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e2"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e2.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>Under the experimental conditions performed, the cathodic branch represents the  hydrogen evolution reaction, while the anodic branch represents the iron  dissolution reaction. They are determined by extrapolation of Tafel lines to the  respective corrosion potentials. Some authors proposed the following mechanism  for the corrosion of iron and steel in acid solution [6,9]:</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="m1"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01m1.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The cathodic hydrogen evolution</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="m2"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01m2.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>As it is shown in <a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a> and <a href="#t2">Table 2</a>, cathodic polarisation curves rise to parallel  Tafel lines indicating that the hydrogen evolution reaction is activation  controlled. Thus the presence of pyridine compounds does not affect the  mechanism of this process.</p>      <p>The addition of pyridine molecules causes a decrease of the current density. The  values of corrosion potential (E<sub>corr</sub>) and cathodic Tafel slope (&beta;c) remain almost  constant upon the addition of inhibitor concentration. The results demonstrate  that the hydrogen reduction is inhibited and that the inhibition efficiency  increases with P3 inhibitor concentration to attain 91,67% at 10<sup>-3</sup> M.  It seems that after potential corrosion, the presence of the pyridine studied does  not change the current versus potential characteristics. Compared to the blank  sample, the anodic curves of the carbon steel electrode in the acid solution shift  obviously to the direction of current reduction as adding the P1, P2 and P3,  which implies that the organic compounds can also suppress the anodic reaction  (steel dissolution) and the variation in the anodic Tafel slope &Delta;a may be due to  the chloride ions/or inhibitor molecules adsorption onto the carbon steel surface.  Based on the marked decrease of the cathodic and anodic current densities upon  introducing the inhibitor in the aggressive solution, this inhibitor is considered as  a mixed-type inhibitor. This means that the addition of pyridine compounds  reduces the anodic dissolution and also retards the cathodic hydrogen evolution  reaction.</p>       <p><b><i>Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)</i></b></p>      <p>Impedance measurements are being ever more widely used in the fields of  electrochemistry and corrosion, although they require costly apparatus and the  interpretation is sometimes quite difficult. With impedance measurements it is  possible to get information about various electrochemical processes and provide  information on both the resistive and capacitive behaviour of the interface,  making possible to evaluate the performance of the studied inhibitors. Before  each EIS experiment, as done with Tafel experiments, the electrode was allowed  to corrode freely for one hour to obtain a steady-state open circuit potential,  corresponding to the corrosion potential, E<sub>corr</sub>, of the working electrode. EIS was  carried out on a newly polished steel surface in acidic solution in the absence and  presence of inhibitor at open circuit potential at 298 K after 30 min of immersion.  Nyquist plots of steel in uninhibited and inhibited acid solutions containing  various concentrations of pyridine compounds are shown in <a href="#f4">Fig. 4</a>.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f4"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f4.jpg">     
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The charge transfer resistance, (R<sub>t</sub>), values were calculated from the difference in impedance  at lower and higher frequencies. To obtain the double capacitance (C<sub>dl</sub>), the  frequency at which the imaginary component of the impedance is maximum (-Z<sub>max</sub>) was found and  C<sub>dl</sub> values obtained from <a href="#e3">equation 3</a>:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e3"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e3.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The percentage inhibition efficiency was calculated from the charge-transfer  resistance by the following <a href="#e4">relation 4</a>, where R<sub>t</sub> and R<sub>t (inh)</sub> are the charge transfer  resistance values with and without inhibitor, respectively:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e4"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e4.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The impedance parameters derived from these investigations are given in <a href="#t3">Table 3</a>.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t3"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t3.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The inhibition efficiency, ERt%, was found to increase with an increase in the  concentration of P1, P2 and P3. It is observed that Rt values increase with the  increase of the pyridines compounds concentration indicating an insulated  adsorption layer formation. This suggests that the role of the inhibitor molecules  is preceded by the adsorption at the metal-solution interface. Therefore, P1, P2  and P3 molecules function by adsorption at the metal-solution interface. The  adsorption of P1, P2 and P3 on the steel electrode leads to a decrease of its  electrical capacity because they might have displaced the water molecules and  other ions originally adsorbed on the metal surface. Decreasing the capacitance,  C<sub>dl</sub>, with increasing concentrations of P1, P2 and P3, resulted from the decrease  in local dielectric constant due to the increase of the electrical double layer  thickness with the formation of a protective layer on the electrode surface.  Effectively and according to the Helmholtz model, the double layer capacitance  C<sub>dl</sub> is given by <a href="#e5">equation 5</a>, where &delta;  is the thickness of the deposit, S is the surface  area of the electrode, &epsilon;<sub>0</sub> is the permittivity of the air and &epsilon; is the medium  dielectric constant:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e5"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e5.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The decrease in C<sub>dl</sub> values (<a href="#f4">Fig. 4</a>) may be attributed either to a decrease of local  dielectric constant [33] or to the thickness of the adsorbed inhibitor layer on the  metal surface [34]. The impedance diagram consists of large capacitive loops  with small inductive one at low frequency values. In fact, the presence of  pyridine compounds enhances the value of Rt in acidic solution indicating a  charge transfer process mainly controlling the corrosion of steel. Values of  double layer capacitance are also brought down to the maximum extent in the  presence of pyridines.</p>      <p>Another evidence for the effective adsorption of P1, P2 and P3 on the steel  surface can be given from the observation that the maximum frequency (f<sub>max</sub>) of  the capacitive loop of the uninhibited solution is decreased with increasing  inhibitor concentration. The results obtained from EIS have shown a similar  trend to those obtained from electrochemical polarizations and weight loss  measurements.</p>       <p><b><i>Effect of temperature</i></b></p>      <p>The effect of temperature on the inhibited acid-metal reaction is very complex,  because many changes occur on the metal surface such as rapid etching,  desorption of inhibitor and the inhibitor itself may undergo decomposition. The  dependence of the corrosion rate on temperature can be expressed by the  Arrhenius equation and transition state equation as presented  in <a href="#e6">Eqs. (6)</a> and <a href="#e7">(7)</a>, respectively.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e6"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e6.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e7"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e7.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The apparent activation energies can be determined by the relation  <a href="#e6">(6)</a>, where E'<sub>a</sub> and E<sub>a</sub> are the apparent activation corrosion energies with and  without inhibitors, R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature  and A is the pre-exponential factor.</p>      <p>Other kinetic data (enthalpy and entropy of corrosion process) are accessible  using the alternative formulation of Arrhenius (<a href="#e6">equation (6)</a>) and transition state  (<a href="#e7">equation (7)</a>), where h is Planck's constant, N is Avogadro's number, &Delta;S<sub>a</sub>&deg; and  &Delta;H<sub>a</sub>&deg; are the entropy and enthalpy of activation, respectively.</p>      <p>The plots of ln (W/T) vs. the reciprocal of temperature, <a href="#f5">Fig. 5</a> and <a href="#f6">6</a>, show  straight lines with a slope equal to (-&Delta;H<sub>a</sub>&deg;/R) and an intercept of (Ln R/Nh +  &Delta;S<sub>a</sub> /R).</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f5"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f5.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f6"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f6.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The values of &Delta;H<sub>a</sub> and &Delta;S<sub>a</sub> are also presented in <a href="#t4">Table 4</a> and <a href="#t5">5</a>.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t4"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t4.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t5"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t5.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The corresponding results are given in <a href="#t6">Tables 6</a> and <a href="#t7">7</a>.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t6"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t6.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t7"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t7.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>We note that the corrosion  rate increases with the rise of temperature both in inhibited and uninhibited acids.  It is clear that inhibition corrosion rate increased with increase in temperature  due to the acceleration process of corrosion in HCl at elevated temperatures. The  inhibition efficiency increased with all inhibitors (P1, P2 and P3) concentration  but decreased with the rise of temperature.</p>      <p>This result suggested that the corrosion inhibitions of steel might be caused by  the adsorption of P1, P2 and P3 compounds onto the steel surface from acidic  solution. As temperatures increased a competition between adsorption and  desorption occurs on the steel surface. The increase of corrosion rate is more  pronounced with the rise of temperature for blank solution. This can be explained  by the decrease of the strength of adsorption processed at elevated temperature  and suggested a physical adsorption mode.</p>      <p>The linear regression plots between ln(W) and 1000/T are presented in <a href="#f7">Fig. 7</a> and  <a href="#f8">8</a>.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f7"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f7.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f8"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f8.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The calculated activation energies, E<sub>a</sub>, and pre-exponential factors, A, at  different concentrations of the inhibitor are collected in <a href="#t5">Table 5</a>.</p>      <p>Analysis of the temperature dependence on inhibition efficiency as well as  comparison of corrosion activation energy in the absence and presence of  inhibitors gives insight knowledge on the possible mechanism of the inhibitor  adsorption. Effectively, the change of the values of the apparent activation  energies may be explained by the modification of the mechanism of the corrosion  process in the presence of adsorbed inhibitor molecules [3-6]. A decrease in  inhibition efficiency with rise in temperature with an increase in E<sub>a</sub> in presence  of the inhibitor compared to the absence is frequently being interpreted as the  formation of an adsorptive film of physisorption [34].</p>      <p>This type of inhibitor retards corrosion at ordinary temperatures but inhibition is  diminished at elevated temperature. It's observed that the E<sub>a</sub> value is increased in  the presence of the inhibitor, indicating the poorer performance of the compound  at higher temperatures. The addition of inhibitor modified the values of the  apparent activation energies; this modification may be attributed to the change in  the mechanism of the corrosion process in the presence of the adsorbed inhibitor  molecules. The lower value of the activation energy (<a href="#t5">Table 5</a>), of the process in  the inhibitor's presence when compared to that in its absence is attributed to its  chemisorption, while the opposite is the case with physical adsorption. This type  of inhibitor retards corrosion at ordinary temperatures but inhibition is  diminished at elevated temperature.</p>      <p>In order to study the data collected in <a href="#t4">Table 4</a>, the effect of temperature on the  corrosion inhibition of mild steel in the acid medium, and to determine the  activation energy of the corrosion process, gravimetric measurements have been  taken at various temperatures (313-353 K) in the presence and absence of P3 at  different temperatures for 1 h. All calculated parameters are given in <a href="#t4">Table 4</a>. It's  observed that the E<sub>a</sub> value is increased in the presence of the inhibitor, which  indicates the poorer performance of the compound at higher temperatures. This  increase of activation energy may be attributed to the process of electrostatic  adsorption of P3 on the steel surface by increasing the energy barrier for the  corrosion process [4, 7, 8].</p>      <p>The positive values of &Delta;H reflect the endothermic nature of the mild steel  dissolution process. The values of E<sub>a</sub> and &Delta;H* enhance with an increase in the  concentration of P3, suggesting that the energy barrier of the corrosion reaction  increases as the concentration of P3 is increased. This means that the corrosion  reaction will further be pushed to surface sites that are characterized by  progressively higher values of E<sub>a</sub> as the concentration of the inhibitor becomes  greater [40]. Inspection of the kinetic data obtained in <a href="#t4">Tables 4</a> and <a href="#t5">5</a>, shows that  all parameters of corrosion process increase with the inhibitor concentration.  The negative values of &Delta;S imply that the disorderness is increased on going from  reactant to product. It is observed that the shift of &Delta;S to more positive values on  increasing the concentration of the extract is the driving force that can overcome  the barriers for the adsorption of inhibitor onto the mild steel surface.  In the present study, it could be found that the &Delta;S* increases with the increase in  concentration of P3, and passes from the -57.15 at 10<sup>-5</sup> M to 22.53 J<sup>-1</sup> mol at 10<sup>-3</sup>  M; furthermore, we notice as the &Delta;S changes its sign from negative to positive as  a result of possible change in the mechanism of the corrosion process and in the  disordering taking place on going from reactants to the activated complex. The  obtained result was similar to the author's previous outcome [1, 9]. The increase  of E<sub>a</sub> and &Delta;H<sub>a</sub>&deg; with an increase in the P3 concentration suggests that the energy  barrier of corrosion reaction increases with the inhibitor's concentration.  In this work, P3 contains the main active centres of molecule and cycle ring. The  presence of free electron pair in the nitrogen atom favours the adsorption of the  inhibitor. It is apparent from the results that the molecular structure of this  compound is essential in affecting the corrosion inhibition [10-12]. This  observation clearly proves that the inhibition is due to the formation of an  insoluble stable film from the process of chemisorption on the metal surface. The  formation of a stable film on the metal surface through chemisorption is tested  and reported [2, 8, 13]. It is found that an adsorbed film is formed on mild steel  surface which is responsible for the inhibition of corrosion in the acid. The  protective activity of the adsorbed film in the acid solution is retained for a  period of time when specimens, dipped in inhibited acid, are transferred to fresh  acid without inhibitor.</p>       <p><b><i>Adsorption isotherm</i></b></p>      <p>It is useful to describe the adsorption process by an appropriate adsorption  isotherm. The extent of corrosion inhibition mainly depends on the surface  conditions and mode of adsorption of the inhibitor. Assumptions were made that  the uncovered parts of the metal surface is equal to zero and the corrosion  process takes place only at the uncovered parts of the metal surface. The degree  of surface coverage (&theta;) has been calculated using &theta;  = IE/100, by assuming a  direct relationship between surface coverage and inhibition efficiency, as  presented in <a href="#t7">Table 7</a>. In order to gain an insight to the mode of adsorption of the  extract onto the mild steel surface, the surface coverage values were fitted into  few adsorption isotherms and the values of correlation coefficient were used to  determine the best fit. Adsorption isotherms are usually used to describe the  adsorption process. The adsorption isotherm provides important clues regarding  the nature of the metal-inhibitor interaction. Inhibitor molecules adsorb on the  metal surface if the interaction between molecule and metal surface is higher  than that of the water molecule and the metal surface. The most frequently used  isotherms include Langmuir, Temkin, Frumkin, Flory-Huggins,.. according to the  following <a href="#e8">equations 8</a>, <a href="#e9">9</a> and <a href="#e10">10</a> [20, 37-45].</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e8"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e8.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e9"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e9.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e10"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e10.jpg">     
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The Frumkin adsorption isotherm (&theta; vs. C) assumes that there is some interaction between the adsorbate, and the  Temkin adsorption isotherm (&theta; vs. lgC) represents the effect of multiple layer  coverage [43] where C is the concentration of the extract, K<sub>ads</sub> is the adsorptive equilibrium  constant, f is the heterogeneous factor of the metal surface describing the  molecular interactions in the adsorption layer and the heterogeneity of the metal  surface. If f &gt; 0, mutual repulsion of molecules occurs, and if f &lt; 0 attraction  takes place. x is the number of inhibitor molecules occupying an active site or the  number of water molecules replaced by one molecule of the extract. K<sub>ads</sub> is  related to the standard free energy of adsorption, &Delta;G<sub>ads</sub>, by the following <a href="#e11">equation 11</a>,  where the numeral of 55.5 is the molar concentration of water in solution, R  is the universal gas constant (8.314 J mol<sup>-1</sup> K<sup>-1</sup>) and T is the temperature (K) [46, 48]:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e11"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e11.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>Langmuir adsorption isotherm is given by the following <a href="#e12">equation 12</a> [58]:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e12"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e12.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The rearrangement gives the following <a href="#e13">equation 13</a>:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e13"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e13.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The Langmuir isotherm (C/&theta; vs. C) assumes that there is no interaction between  adsorbed molecules on the surface. Langmuir isotherm was tested for its fit to the  experimental data. The plots of C/&theta; versus C which is the Langmuir adsorption  isotherm gives a straight line with an intercept of 1/Kads, as shown in <a href="#f9">Fig. 9</a> and <a href="#f10">10</a>.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f9"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f9.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f10"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f10.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The negative values of DG&deg;ads for P1, P2 and P3 ensure the spontaneity of the  adsorption process and stability of the adsorbed layer on the steel surface. <a href="#f7">Fig. 7</a>  shows the relationship between C/&theta; and C of P3 at various temperatures. The  more negative value of &Delta;G&deg;<sub>ads</sub> for P3 indicated that this last one is more strongly  adsorbed on the steel surface. Generally, values of DG&deg;<sub>ads</sub> around -20 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> or  lower are consistent with the electrostatic interaction between the charged  molecules and the charged metal (physisorption); those around -40 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> or  higher involve charge sharing or transfer from organic molecules to the metal  surface to form a coordinate type of bond (chemisorption). The calculated DG&deg;ads  values of slightly more negative than -40 kJ.mol<sup>-1</sup> indicate, therefore, that the  adsorption mechanism of the pyridines tested on steel in 1 N HCl solution was  typical of chemisorption (<a href="#t8">Table 8</a>).</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t8"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t8.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The unshared electron pairs in nitrogen may  interact with d-orbitals of steel to provide a protective chemisorbed film [34].  According to the Van't Hoff <a href="#e14">equation 14</a> [27]:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e14"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e14.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>To obtain the adsorption heat, the linear regression between ln(K) and 1/T was  dealt. Under the experimental conditions, the adsorption heat could be  approximately regarded as the standard adsorption heat (&Delta;H<sub>ads</sub>). &Delta;H&deg;<sub>ads</sub> found by  the Van't Hoff equation may be also evaluated by the Gibbs-Helmholtz  equation, which is defined as follows <a href="#e15">eq. 15</a>:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e15"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e15.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>which can be arranged to give the following <a href="#e16">equation 16</a>:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e16"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e16.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>According to the thermodynamic basic <a href="#e17">equation 17</a>:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e17"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e17.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>the standard adsorption entropy &Delta;S&deg;<sub>ads</sub> could be calculated. All the obtained  thermodynamic parameters are shown in <a href="#t8">Table 8</a>.</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The positive values of &Delta;H* reflect that the process of adsorption of the inhibitors  on the steel surface is an endothermic process. In the present case, the standard  adsorption heat -28.80 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> shows that a comprehensive adsorption (physical  adsorption) might occur. The same results were obtained in previous works [30].  In our study, the negative values of &Delta;H&deg;<sub>ads</sub> also show that the adsorption of  inhibitor is an exothermic process [20].</p>      <p>On the other hand, values of &Delta;S&deg;<sub>a</sub> are more positive in acid solutions containing  inhibitors than those obtained in the uninhibited solutions. This behaviour can be  explained as a result of the replacement process of water molecules during the  adsorption of inhibitors on steel surface. This observation is in agreement with  the findings of other workers [5, 6, 14] . However, mild steel corrosion in the free  acid was characterized by the more negative &Delta;S&deg;, a value which implies that the  activation complex in the rate determining step required association rather than  dissociation [5, 8]. The adsorption of inhibitor molecules was commonly  believed that simple adsorption on bare surface was generally an endothermic  process which was accompanied by a decrease in entropy.</p>      <p>Adsorption of the organic compound depends upon the charge and the nature of  the metal surface, electronic characteristics of the metal surface on adsorption of  solvent and other ionic species, temperature of the corrosion reaction and the  electrochemical potential at the metal solution interface. The first one is weak  undirected interaction due to electrostatic attraction between inhibiting organic  ions or dipoles and the electrically charged surface of the metal. This type of  interaction involves charge sharing or charge transfer from adsorbate to the  atoms of the metal surface in order to form a coordinate type bond and the  interaction is termed chemical adsorption or chemisorption [53].</p>       <p><i>Quantum chemical study</i></p>      <p>Geometry optimization is a name for the procedure that attempts to find the  configuration of minimum energy of the molecule. The procedure calculates the  wave function and the energy at a starting geometry and then proceeds to search  a new geometry of a lower energy. This is repeated until the lowest energy  geometry is found. The procedure calculates the force on each atom by  evaluating the gradient (first derivative) of the energy with respect to atomic  positions. Sophisticated algorithms are then used at each step to select a new  geometry, aiming for rapid convergence to the geometry of the lowest energy. In  the final minimum energy geometry, the force on each atom is zero. It is  important to recognize that this procedure will not necessarily find the global  minimum, i.e., the geometry with the lowest energy. By its nature, a successive  search for a minimum finds a local minimum but not necessarily the lowest. In  fact, the optimization procedure stops when it finds a stationary point, i.e., a  point where forces on the atoms are zero, and this may be also a saddle point  (i.e., a transition structure). This will occur particularly if we restrict the  symmetry of the molecule and do not allow the program to search the full space  of molecular configurationally degrees of freedom. It is always a good idea to  start a procedure of a geometry optimization calculation with a small basis set  and a relatively poor method before we move to the basis set and method of  choice for a particular problem. You can then start the final geometry  optimization from the geometry selected by the simpler and less accurate  approach. We can even use the second derivatives of the energy with respect to  atomic coordinates (obtained during the optimization process or from a  frequency run to further improve the geometry optimization) [15].</p>      <p>Complete geometrical optimizations of the investigated molecules are performed  using DFT (density functional theory) with the Beck's three parameter exchange  functional along with the Lee-Yang-Parr nonlocal correlation functional  (B3LYP) [12-14] with 6-31G* basis set is implemented in Gaussian 03 program  package [15]. This approach is shown to yield favourable geometries for a wide  variety of systems. This basis set gives good geometry optimizations. The  geometry structure was optimized under no constraint. The following quantum  chemical parameters were calculated from the obtained optimized structure:  several quantum parameters will be determined for possible relations with the  inhibitor efficiencies of the pyridine molecules (<a href="#t9">Tables 9</a> and <a href="#t10">10</a>) [16, 17].</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t9"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t9.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="t10"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01t10.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The energy of HOMO is often associated with the electron donating ability of a  molecule. The less negative HOMO energy and the smaller energy gap (&Delta;E=  E<sub>LUMO</sub> -E<sub>HOMO</sub>) are often interpreted by a stronger chemisorption bond and  perhaps greater inhibitor efficiency. The calculations were carried out for the  pyridine derivatives. The geometry of all compounds under investigation was  determined by optimizing all geometrical variables without any symmetry  constraints. The harmonic frequencies were computed from analytical derivatives  for all species in order to define the minimum-energy structures. According to  DFT method, the ionization potential, I can be approximated as the negative of  the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy [18],</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e18"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e18.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The negative of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy is  similarly related to the electron affinity A. In modern terms, we relate affinity to  the phenomenon whereby certain atoms or molecules have the tendency to  aggregate or bond.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e19"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e19.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The electron donating power of a donor molecule is measured by its ionization  potential which is the energy required to remove an electron from the highest  occupied molecular orbital. The overall energy balance (&Delta;E), i.e., energy gained  or lost, in an electron donor-acceptor transfer is determined by the difference  between the acceptor's electron affinity (A) and the ionization potential (I):</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e20"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e20.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>In chemistry, the class of electron donors that donate not just one, but a set of  two paired electrons that form a covalent bond with an electron acceptor  molecule, is known as a Lewis base. This phenomenon gives rise to the wide  field of Lewis acid-base chemistry [1]. The driving forces for electron donor and  acceptor behaviour in chemistry are based on the concepts of electro  positivity (for donors) and electronegativity (for acceptors) of atomic or  molecular entities. Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis was performed to  evaluate the electron-density distributions. The electron density plays an  important role in calculating the chemical reactivity parameters. The global  reactivity includes electronegativity, which is identified in the finite difference  approximation as the negative of the chemical potential. The ionization energy is  typically specified in electron Volts (eV) and refers to the energy required to  remove a single electron from a single atom or molecule</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e21"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e21.jpg">     
]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>In 1983 Pearson together with Robert Parr extended the qualitative HSAB theory  with a quantitative definition of the chemical hardness (&eta;) as being proportional  to the second derivative of the total energy of a chemical system with respect to  changes in the number of electrons at a fixed nuclear environment:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e22"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e22.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>The factor of one-half is arbitrary and often dropped as Pearson has noted. An  operational definition for the chemical hardness is obtained by applying a three- point finite difference approximation to the second derivative [19]:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e23a"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e23a.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>the global hardness (&eta;) defined as </p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e23b"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e23b.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>where I is the ionization potential and A the electron affinity. This expression  implies that the chemical hardness is proportional to the band gap of a chemical  system, when a gap exists.</p>      <p>The first derivative of the energy with respect to the number of electrons is equal  to the chemical potential, &mu;, of the system,</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e24"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e24.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>from which an operational definition for the chemical potential is obtained from  a finite difference approximation to the first order derivative as</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e25"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e25.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>which is equal to the negative of the electronegativity (&chi;) definition on  the Mulliken scale: &mu; = -&chi;. The hardness and Mulliken electronegativity are  related as:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e26"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e26.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>and in this sense hardness is a measure for resistance to deformation or change.  Likewise a value of zero denotes maximum softness, where softness is defined as  the reciprocal of hardness and the global softness (&sigma;) as its inverse:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e27"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e27.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>During the interaction of the pyridine derivatives with the steel surface, electrons  flow from the lower electronegativity pyridine derivative to the higher  electronegativity steel surface until the chemical potential becomes equalized.  The fraction of the transferred electron, DN was estimated according to Pearson  [15, 18, 20]:</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="e28"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01e28.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>Quantum chemical parameters obtained from the calculations which are  responsible for the inhibition efficiency of inhibitors, such as the highest  occupied molecular orbital (E<sub>HOMO</sub>), energy of lowest unoccupied molecular  orbital (E<sub>LUMO</sub>), HOMO-LUMO energy gap (&Delta;E<sub>H-L</sub>), dipole moment (&mu;) and total  energy (TE), electronegativity (&chi;), electron affinity (A), global hardness (&eta;),  softness (&sigma;), ionization potential (I), the global electrophilicity (&omega;), the fraction of  electrons transferred from the inhibitor to steel surface (&Delta;N) and the total energy  (TE), are collected in <a href="#t10">Table 10</a>.</p>      <p>In <a href="#f11">Fig. 11</a>, we have presented the frontier molecule orbital density distributions  of the studied compounds.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p> <a name="f11"> <img src="/img/revistas/pea/v32n2/32n2a01f11.jpg">     
<p>&nbsp;</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Analysis of <a href="#f11">Fig. 11</a> shows the distribution of two  energies HOMO and LUMO; we can see that the electron density of the HOMO  location in the pyridine molecules is mostly distributed near the nitrogen (N)  atoms and pyridine rings, indicating that these are the favourite sites for  adsorption, while the density LUMO was distributed almost of the entire  molecules.</p>      <p>The E<sub>HOMO</sub> is a quantum chemical parameter which is often associated with the  electron donating ability of the molecule. High value of E<sub>HOMO</sub> = -0.249 eV for  P3 is likely to a tendency of the molecule to donate electrons to appropriate  acceptor molecule of low empty molecular orbital energy and indicates also the  better inhibition efficiency [15, 17].</p>      <p>It has also been found that an inhibitor does not only donate an electron to the  unoccupied d orbital of the metal ion but can also accept electrons from the d  orbital of the metal leading to the formation of a feedback bond. Therefore, the  tendency for the formation of a feedback bond would depend on the value of  E<sub>LUMO</sub>. The lower the E<sub>LUMO</sub>, the easier is the acceptance of electrons from the d  orbital of the metal. Based on the values of E<sub>LUMO</sub>, the order obtained for the  decrease in inhibition efficiency (P3 &lt; P2 &lt; P1) was also similar to the one  obtained from experimental results.</p>      <p>A band gap, also called an energy gap, is an energy range in a solid where  no electron states can exist. In graphs of the electronic band structure, the band  gap generally refers to the energy difference (in electron Volts) between the top  of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band in metal. This is  equivalent to the energy required to free an outer shell electron from its orbit  about the nucleus to become a mobile charge carrier, able to move freely within  the solid material, so the band gap is a major factor determining the electrical  conductivity of a metal.</p>      <p>We concluded that the large values of the energy gap (&Delta;E) imply high electronic  stability and then low reactivity, when low values imply that it will be easier to  remove an electron from the HOMO orbital to LUMO one which can result in  good inhibition efficiency. As &Delta;E decreases, the reactivity of the molecule  increases leading to increase the inhibition efficiency of the molecule.</p>      <p>The results presented in <a href="#t10">Table 10</a> show that &Delta;Egap = E<sub>LUMO</sub> -E<sub>HOMO</sub> = 0.063 eV  for P3 have the lowest energy gaps. Therefore, their higher reactivity can allow  them to be easily adsorbed onto the mild steel surface leading to increase their  inhibitive efficiencies compared to P2 &Delta;Egap = 0.143 eV [21].</p>      <p>Dipole moment is the measure of polarity of a polar covalent bond. It is defined  as the product of charge on the atoms and the distance between the two bonded  atoms. The dipole moment of the molecule gives information on the polarity of  the given system, however, reflects only the global polarity of a molecule. For a  complete molecule the total molecular dipole moment may be approximated as  the vector sum of individual bond dipole moments.</p>      <p>The dipole moment (&mu; in Debye) is another important electronic parameter that  results from non-uniform distribution of charges on the various atoms in the  molecule. Molecules that have high dipole moment have a tendency to interact  with other molecule through electrostatic interactions (e.g., dipole-dipole  interactions). The high value of dipole moment probably increases the adsorption  between the chemical compound and the metal surface [15]. The energy of the  deformability increases with the increase in &mu;, making the molecule easier to  adsorb at the steel surface. The volume of the inhibitor molecules also increases  with the increase of &mu;. This increases the contact area between the molecule and  surface of steel, increasing the corrosion inhibition ability of the inhibitors.</p>      <p>The dipole moment of a molecule is strongly determined by the shape of the  molecule, size of the molecule and type of atoms constituting the molecule. The  relationship between inhibition efficiencies and dipole moment of similar  molecules have often given results that are not univocal, i.e., in some instances  the dipole moment appears to increase with increasing inhibition efficiencies,  while in other systems the dipole moment appears to decrease with increase in  the inhibition efficiencies of the inhibitors. In our study, there is direct  relationship between the EI(%) and the dipole moment. The results of the dipole  moment for P2 and P3 are reported in <a href="#t10">Table 10</a>. The dipole moment follows the  order; &mu;= 13.4325 Debye for P3 > &mu;= 3.2311 Debye for P2, which is not in  agreement with trends in the experimental inhibition efficiencies of the inhibitors  earlier reported in literature.</p>      <p>The total energy presented in <a href="#t10">Table 10</a>, calculated by quantum chemical methods  is also a beneficial parameter. The total energy of a system is composed of the  internal, potential, and kinetic energy. The total energy of a system including that  of the many body effects of electrons (exchange and correlation) in the presence  of static external potential (for example, the atomic nuclei) is a unique functional  of the charge density. The minimum value of the total energy functional is the  ground state energy of the system. The electronic charge density which yields  this minimum is then the exact single particle ground state energy. In our study  the total energy of the best inhibitor P3 is equal to 0.13917 a.u.; the value of  compound P2 is equal to 0.0339 a.u.</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Mulliken charges showed in <a href="#t9">Table 9</a>, arise from the Mulliken population analysis  and provide a means of estimating partial atomic charges from calculations  carried out by the methods of computational chemistry, particularly those based  on the linear combination of atomic orbital molecular method. The Mulliken  charges obtained using DFT/B3LYP/6-31G are significantly different from the  results of other methods. This result is consistent with the fact that Mulliken  atomic charges are strongly basis-set sensitive and in most instances tend to  become unphysical when large basis sets with diffuse functions are employed  [22]. The Mulliken atomic charges obtained are also not realistic. The partial  charges on the individual atoms in a molecule also indicate the reactive centres  for a particular inhibitor. Atoms with the highest negative charge are considered  to have an electron donor role when interacting with metal surfaces. The  Mulliken atomic charges for the heteroatoms of the pyridine derivatives are  reported in <a href="#t9">Table 9</a> and show that N atoms have the highest negative charge. The  partial charges on the individual atoms in a molecule also indicate the reactive  centres for a particular inhibitor. Atoms with the highest negative charge are  considered to have an electron donor role when interacting with metal surfaces.  Moreover, the negative charge on the N atom increases across the structures,  respectively for P3 and (P1, P2).</p>      <p>This result is consistent with the fact that the electron withdrawing effect of some  N atoms in the structure for P3, and decreases the negative charge on the N atom  in the ring while the electron donating role. In view of the above results, P3 has  greater tendency to adsorb on the metal surface because it has three highly  negative charged centres, while P2 is preferentially the molecule with the least  negative charge.</p>      <p>Absolute hardness and softness are important properties to measure the  molecular stability and reactivity. It is apparent that the chemical hardness  fundamentally signifies the resistance towards the deformation or polarization of  the electron cloud of the atoms, ions or molecules under small perturbation of  chemical reaction. A hard molecule has a large energy gap and a soft molecule  has a small energy gap [23]. Soft molecules are more reactive than hardness  because they can easily offer electrons. Hence, inhibitors with the highest values  of global softness (the least values of the global hardness) are expected to be  good corrosion inhibitors for bulk metals in acidic media. For the simplest  transfer of electron, adsorption could occur at the part of the molecule where  softness (&sigma;), which is a local property, has a highest value. In our present study  P3 with low softness value &sigma; = 31.7460(eV) compared with other compounds has  a low energy gap. The most widely used quantity to describe the polarity is the  dipole moment of the molecule.</p>      <p>The fraction of electrons transferred describes the trend of electrons donation  within a set of inhibitors. In literature it has been reported that the values of &Delta;N  show inhibition effect resulted from electrons donation. According to our study,  the inhibition efficiency increased with increasing the electron donating ability of  the inhibitor at the metal surface and increasing electron-donating ability at the  metal surface.</p>      <p>It is worth noting that all the computed descriptors are in total agreement with the  experimental inhibition efficiencies of the investigated inhibitors, which confirms  that the presence of heteroatoms enhances the donor abilities of these molecules  increasing their adsorption on the metal surface and thereby leading to higher  experimental inhibition efficiencies.</p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>Conclusion</b></p>      <p>The results of the present work can lead to the following conclusions:</p>      <p>1. The organics tested reveal excellent protective qualities for protection of mild  steel against corrosion in 1N HCl medium. This results in an increase in  inhibition efficiency. This increase is particularly marked when the  concentration is high and attains around 92% for P3.</p>      <p>2. Reasonable good agreement was observed between the data obtained from  potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy  techniques.</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>3. P1, P2 and P3 slows down the cathodic reaction to greater extent than the  anodic one, suggesting that these compounds mainly act as mixed-type  inhibitors.</p>      <p>4. The adsorption of all inhibitors is well described by the Langmuir adsorption  isotherm. All values of the standard Gibbs energy of adsorption are negative,  confirming that both chemisorption and physisorption control the adsorption  phenomenon.</p>      <p>5. The study of the influence of temperature in the range between 298 and 333 K  showed that the inhibition rate decreases with temperature and the activation  energy is modified by the presence of inhibitors. The change could be  attributed to the chemisorptions of the inhibitor to the surface of the steel.</p>      <p>6. The impact of concentration, temperature and immersion time taken together  on corrosion inhibition process demonstrates the double character nature of the  adsorption phenomena. It remains not evident to attribute bluntly either  chemisorption or physisorption mechanism for the studied inhibitors. The  authors believe that the studied inhibitors are adsorbed by mixed mode  (physisorption and chemisorption both involved to some extent) onto the mild  steel interface.</p>      <p>7. The electrochemical impedance results show that the Nyquist diagrams  obtained have a single capacitive loop indicating that the corrosion of mild  steel is mainly controlled by the charge transfer process.</p>      <p>8. This study has also suggested that the inhibitors act by adsorption by forming  a protective layer on the metal surface and the piperidine tested adsorbs  according to the Langmuir isotherm. Determination of heat of adsorption  reinforced the chemisorption postulate.</p>      <p>9. Theoretical calculations (quantum chemical) are in good agreement with the  results obtained from electrochemical study and structure-corrosion protection  relationships, which also confirms that the adsorption centre is N atoms.</p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><b>References</b></p>      <!-- ref --><p>1. Barouni K, Bazzi L, Albourine A. Annales De Chimie-Science Des Materiaux. 2010;35:333.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000242&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <p>2. El Ouali I, Chetouani A, Hammouti B, Aouniti A, Touzani R, El Kadiria S and Nlate S. Port Electrochim Acta. 2013;31:53.</p>      <p>3. Abiola OK, John MO, Asekunowo PO, Okafor PC, James OO. Green ChemLett Rev. 2011;4:273.</p>      <!-- ref --><p>4. Beenakumari KS. Port Electrochim Acta. 2013;31:235-239.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000246&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>5. Chetouani A, Daoudi M, Hammouti B, et al. Corros Sci. 2006;48:2987.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000248&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>6. Bouklah M, Attayibat A, Kertit S, et al. Appl Surf Sci. 2005;242:399.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000250&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>7. Musa AY, Kadhum AAH, Mohamad AB, et al. J Central South Univ Technol. 2010;17:34.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000252&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>8. Bentiss F, Jama C, Mernari B, et al. Corros Sci. 2009;51:1628.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000254&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>9. Zarrok H, Zarrouk A, Salghi S, et al. Port Electrochim Acta. 2012;30:405.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000256&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>10. Figueira RM, Pereira EV, Silva CJR, et al. Port Electrochim Acta. 2013;31:277.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000258&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>11. Musa AY, Kadhum AAH, Takriff MS, et al. Corros Eng Sci Technol. 2010;45:163.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000260&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>12. Keles H, Keles M, Dehri I, et al. Mater Chem Phys. 2008;112:173.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000262&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>13. Chetouani A, Hammouti B, Aouniti A, et al. Prog Org Coat. 2002;45:373.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000264&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>14. Ouchrif A, Zegmout M, Hammouti B, et al. Prog Org Coat. 2005;53:292.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000266&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>15. Zarrouk A, Zarrok H, Salghi R, et al. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:6353.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000268&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>16. Bouklah M, Harek H, Touzani R, et al. Arab J Chem. 2012;5:163.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000270&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>17. Boussalah N, Ghalem S, El Kadiri S, et al. Res Chem Intermed. 2012;38:2009.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000272&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>18. Ebenso EE, Kabanda MM, Arslan T, et al. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:5643.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000274&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>19. Eddy NO, Ameh PO, Gwarzo MY, et al. Port Electrochim Acta. 2013;31:79.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000276&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>20. Zarrouk, Hammouti B, Zarrok H, et al. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:89.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000278&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>21. El Ashry EH, El Nemr A, Ragab S. J Molec Model. 2012;18:1173.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000280&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>22. Zarrok H, Zarrouk A, Salghi R, et al. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:8958.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000282&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>      <!-- ref --><p>23. Zarrok H, Al-Deyab SS, Zarrouk A, et al. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:4047.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000284&pid=S0872-1904201400020000100023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></p>       <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><a name=0></a><sup><a href="#top">*</a></sup>Corresponding author. E-mail address: <a href="mailto:hammoutib@gmail.com">hammoutib@gmail.com</a></p>      <p>Received 4 March 2014; accepted 4 April 2014</p>      <p><a href="http://www.peacta.org" target="_blank">www.peacta.org</a> </p>        ]]></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barouni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bazzi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albourine]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Annales De Chimie-Science Des Materiaux]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<page-range>333</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El Ouali]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chetouani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Port Electrochim Acta]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abiola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[John]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Asekunowo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Green ChemLett Rev]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>273</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beenakumari]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Port Electrochim Acta]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>235</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chetouani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Daoudi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corros Sci]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<page-range>2987</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bouklah]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Attayibat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kertit]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Appl Surf Sci]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>242</volume>
<page-range>399</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Musa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kadhum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A A H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohamad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J Central South Univ Technol]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bentiss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jama]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mernari]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corros Sci]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<page-range>1628</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrouk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salghi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Port Electrochim Acta]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>405</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Figueira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pereira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C J R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Port Electrochim Acta]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>277</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Musa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kadhum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A A H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takriff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Corros Eng Sci Technol]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<page-range>163</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dehri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mater Chem Phys]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>112</volume>
<page-range>173</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chetouani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aouniti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Prog Org Coat]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<page-range>373</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ouchrif]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zegmout]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Prog Org Coat]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>292</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrouk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salghi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Electrochem Sci]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>6353</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bouklah]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Touzani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Arab J Chem]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>163</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boussalah]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ghalem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El Kadiri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Res Chem Intermed]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<page-range>2009</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ebenso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kabanda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arslan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Electrochem Sci]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>5643</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eddy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ameh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gwarzo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Port Electrochim Acta]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>79</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrouk]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammouti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Electrochem Sci]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>89</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El Ashry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El Nemr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ragab]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[J Molec Model]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>1173</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrouk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salghi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Electrochem Sci]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>8958</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Al-Deyab]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrouk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Electrochem Sci]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>4047</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
