SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.81 número1Infeções sexualmente transmissíveis importadas na EuropaAngiossarcoma de couro cabeludo em paciente idoso: um relato de caso índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Portuguese Journal of Dermatology and Venereology

versão impressa ISSN 2795-501Xversão On-line ISSN 2795-5001

Port J Dermatol Venereol. vol.81 no.1 Lisboa mar. 2023  Epub 01-Fev-2023

https://doi.org/10.24875/pjdv.22000020 

CASE REPORT

Behçet’s disease as a differential diagnosis of acute genital ulcer: a case report

Doença de Behçet como diagnóstico diferencial de úlcera genital aguda: relato de caso

Giulia Marchetti1  *  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-3340

Iramaia Cardoso-Vasquez1  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0018-7082

Adriana Bittencourt-Campaner1  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3044-3019

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Irmandade de Misericórdia da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil


Abstract

Acute genital ulcers (AGU) have numerous etiologies and are a frequent complaint in the emergency room. Its diagnosis is mostly clinical and initially approached in a syndromic manner. It is based on history, physical examination, and laboratory findings. It is known that genital ulcer can be the first manifestation of Behçet’s disease (BD) and its early recognition can prevent clinical complications related to the disease and improve the patient’s quality of life. The present article aims to report the case of a patient with an extensive and deep ulcerative lesion of the vulva, who was initially treated with acyclovir due to the suspicion of genital herpes. Subsequently, after the condition worsened and when adequate anamnesis was collected, diagnostic criteria for BD were identified and the correct treatment was started, with therapeutic success. From the above, it is essential that the gynecologist focuses on BD as one of the differential diagnoses for acute genital ulcer.

Keywords Behçet syndrome; Diagnosis; Differential; Female genitalia; Ulcer

Resumo

As úlceras genitais agudas possuem inúmeras etiologias e são uma queixa frequente de procura ao pronto socorro. Seu diagnóstico é majoritariamente clínico e inicialmente abordado de forma sindrômica. É baseado na história, exame físico e achados laboratoriais. Sabe-se que a úlcera genital pode ser a primeira manifestação da doença de Behçet e seu reconhecimento precoce pode evitar complicações clínicas relacionadas à doença, além de melhorar a qualidade de vida da paciente. O presente artigo teve como objetivo relatar caso de paciente com lesão ulcerosa extensa e profunda da vulva, que foi inicialmente tratada com acyclovir, pela suspeita de herpes genital. Posteriormente, após piora do quadro e ao coletar-se anamnese adequada, identificou-se critérios diagnósticos para doença de Behçet e iniciou-se o tratamento correto, com sucesso terapêutico. Do exposto, é fundamental que o ginecologista se atente à doença de Behçet como um dos diagnósticos diferenciais para úlcera genital aguda.

Palavras-chave Diagnóstico; Diferencial; Genitália feminina; Síndrome de Behçet; Úlcera

Introduction

Acute genital ulcers (AGU) are a frequent cause of emergency room visits and can be located in the anogenital area or vagina. Its diagnosis is mostly clinical and initially approached from a syndromic point of view. It is based on history, physical examination, and, in some cases, laboratory findings. AGU can be categorized into infectious and noninfectious groups1. Sexually transmitted infections are the main representative of the first group and include herpes simplex, syphilis, lymphogranuloma venereum, chancroid, and donovanosis. Among the most prevalent nonsexually transmitted infectious agents, the Epstein-Barr virus and Cytomegalovirus stand out17. In the group of noninfectious ulcers, the main etiologies are Behçet’s disease (BD), Chron’s disease, and Lipschütz’s ulcer1.

However, the etiological diagnosis of AGU is difficult since there is a wide variety of causative agents and in many cases, they are poorly recognized by the attending physicians3. BD is a multisystem inflammatory disease with vascular involvement, characterized by periods of outbreaks and remission, commonly addressed by rheumatologists8,9. However, AGU is one of its first manifestations and the dermatological evaluation is, most of the time, responsible for initially suspecting the diagnosis9. The disease can, on many occasions, develop into a serious clinical condition, compromising the patient’s health if the diagnosis is not made immediately.

The doctor in the emergency room is frequently faced with AGU and must be prepared to adequately identify its various etiologies. It is essential that they recognize the characteristics of Behçet’s ulcer in order to avoid misdiagnosis and delay in the treatment of the disease. Thus, the objective of the present study is to report a case of a patient with extensive and deep ulcers triggered by BD, as well as to discuss the clinical and pathological findings and to carry out a brief review of the literature on the syndromic approach to AGU.

Case description

The present work was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Irmandade de Misericórdia da Santa Casa de São Paulo Hospital and the patient signed a free and informed consent form for publication. A 31-year-old female patient sought the emergency department complaining of multiple painful vulvar ulcers that had started 1 day before. She was initially treated with oral acyclovir due to suspected genital herpes. After 3 days of treatment, she observed an important and progressive worsening of the condition and returned to the emergency room. On return, she presented herself with several ulcerative lesions on the vulva, with well-defined, deep, and very painful edges located in the labia majora, and introitus. The ulcers had a necrotic background, some with a violet halo around them (Figures 1 and 2). No changes were seen in the vagina and cervix.

Figure 1 Deep, extensive, confluent, and well-defined acute vulvar genital ulcers with well-defined edges characterize Behcet’s disease-related genital ulcers. 

Figure 2 Deep, extensive, confluent, and well-defined acute vulvar genital ulcers with well-defined edges characterize Behcet’s disease-related genital ulcers. 

The patient denied previous illnesses or surgeries, use of medication, or risky sexual behavior. She had a previous natural delivery and active sexual life with a steady partner, using oral hormonal contraception. The patient’s mother was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus.

She was hospitalized and treated with intravenous corticosteroids due to suspicion of BD or Lipschütz ulcer, debridement of ulcers, and local hygiene were also performed. Serologies were performed for herpes simplex, human immunodeficiency virus, Cytomegalovirus, syphilis, and all results were negative. Complementary tests such as blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation, and antinuclear factor did not show relevant changes.

There was an improvement of the lesions, and she was discharged after 7 days; home use of prednisone 20 mg/day and referral to a rheumatologist were advised. Complete improvement of the vulvar lesions occurred in about 40 days. In the subsequent detailed anamnesis, she reported a history of recurrent oral ulcers since adolescence, with about seven episodes per year, in addition to nonspecific and intermittent polyarthralgia without a definitive diagnosis. Thus, her previous history and the presented evolution of the case confirmed the diagnosis as BD. Treatment with prednisone 20 mg daily was maintained and oral colchicine was introduced. The patient is doing well, with no further lesions.

Discussion

Among the noninfectious etiologies of AGU that can affect women, BD is important due to the high prevalence, as well as the severity of the disease. The most common clinical manifestations of BD are recurrent oral and genital ulcers, skin lesions (erythema nodosum, pustular lesions, pyoderma gangrenosum, and superficial thrombophlebitis), uveitis, in addition to multiple other less common systemic manifestations. It is not a disease with chronic and persistent inflammatory activity; recurrent attacks of acute inflammation are more common. Although most of its manifestations are considered benign and self-limiting, the involvement of the central nervous system and large vessels, a less usual manifestation, can be severe or progressive, with significant lethality8,10.

The AGU associated with BD is generally characterized by defined borders, with an erythematous or violet halo, associated with a yellowish or greyish pseudomembrane, and a necrotic background. Lesions tend to form scars and genital sequelae8. The pain component is also present but may be a confounding factor with other etiologies.

Behçet’s disease (BD) has its complete pathophysiology unknown. It is known that some viral and bacterial infectious agents can behave as instigators of the inflammatory response behind the disease. However, several theories are still being investigated and none completely justifies the development of the disease, which makes it difficult to standardize an effective diagnostic test. The genetic correlation with the HLA-B51 class I antigen is important in pathogenesis, but its presence alone is not sufficient to explain all of the observed symptoms8. Therefore, it is difficult to predict risk factors for the development of the condition, while an adequate anamnesis and physical examination are essential since the diagnosis is fundamentally clinical.

There are numerous diagnostic classifications proposed for the disease based on the patient’s symptoms, but there are no definitive satisfactory complementary tests to confirm the diagnosis11. The international criteria of the BD should always include the major criteria of recurrent oral ulcers (at least three times in 1 year) and at least two minor criteria, such as recurrent genital ulcers, eye lesions, skin lesions, or positive pathergy test, in the absence of any clinical explanation12. Other classifications described in the literature are widely used and present variations of the International criteria, such as those by C.G. Barnes and H. Yazici and the International Team for the Revision of the International Criteria for BD (2014)13,14.

In the case reported, the patient’s ulcer contemplated the characteristics of a lesion commonly described in BD. However, an erroneous initial etiological diagnosis of AGU was made since the pain component was valued and not associated with other characteristics of the lesion. Herpes simplex was first treated with acyclovir. The syndromic approach to AGU recommended by the Ministry of Health of our country initially includes the treatment of herpes simplex as it is one of the most common etiologic agents in cases of AGU1,2,15.

A complete anamnesis was performed later and personal and family history, such as oral ulcers in adolescence, intermittent polyarthralgia, and maternal autoimmune disease, were only considered after years of symptoms. This could have elucidated the condition and contributed to the delay in diagnosis and treatment.

The morbidity and mortality of BD are significant and early treatment can improve the quality of life, avoiding irreversible damage and exacerbation of the disease since there is no cure. The treatment regimen is varied and involves the use of immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory drugs to induce and maintain the remission of the condition9. In the case under study, the proper use of medications promoted complete improvement of symptoms without recurrence of lesions.

Conclusion

AGU can be the first clinical manifestation of BD, and the dermatological evaluation can be responsible for initially suspecting the diagnosis when faced with this complaint in the emergency room. It is essential that everyone should be able to recognize the characteristics of Behçet’s ulcer and invest a few minutes of care in improving the anamnesis to avoid delay in the diagnosis. In that way, the patient’s quality of life will be assured. Thus, understanding the syndromic approach to AGU is extremely important in the medical field.

REFERENCES

1. Workowski KA. Centers for disease control and prevention sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:S759–62. [ Links ]

2. Farhi D, Wendling J, Molinari E, Raynal J, Carcelain G, Morand P, et al. Non-sexually related acute genital ulcers in 13 pubertal girls:a clinical and microbiological study. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:38–45. [ Links ]

3. Cheng SX, Chapman MS, Margesson LJ, Birenbaum D. Genital ulcers caused by Epstein-Barr virus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51:824–6. [ Links ]

4. Kuloğlu Z, Kansu A, Demirçeken F, Bozkir M, Kundakçi N, Bingöl-Koloğlu M, et al. Crohn's disease of the vulva in a 10-year-old girl. Turk J Pediatr. 2008;50:197–9. [ Links ]

5. Halvorsen JA, Brevig T, Aas T, Skar AG, Slevolden EM, Moi H. Genital ulcers as initial manifestation of Epstein-Barr virus infection:two new cases and a review of the literature. Acta Derm Venereol. 2006;86:439–42. [ Links ]

6. Barnes CJ, AlióAB, Cunningham BB, Friedlander SF. Epstein-Barr virus-associated genital ulcers:an under-recognized disorder. Pediatr Dermatol. 2007;24:130–4. [ Links ]

7. Cebesoy FB, Balat O, Inaloz S. Premenarchal vulvar ulceration:is chronic irritation a causative factor?Pediatr Dermatol. 2009;26:514–8. [ Links ]

8. Scherrer MAR, Rocha VB, Garcia LC. Behçet's disease:review with emphasis on dermatological aspects. An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92:452–64. [ Links ]

9. Alpsoy E, Bozca BC, Bilgic A. Behçet Ddisease:an update for dermatologist. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22:477–502. [ Links ]

10. Alpsoy E. Behçet's disease:a comprehensive review with a focus on epidemiology, etiology and clinical features, and management of mucocutaneous lesions. J Dermatol. 2016;43:620–32. [ Links ]

11. Hatemi G, Seyahi E, Fresko I, Talarico R, Hamuryudan V. Behçet's syndrome:a critical digest of the 2014-2015 literature. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33:S3–12. [ Links ]

12. Criteria for diagnosis of Behçet's disease. International Study Group for Behçet's Disease. Lancet. 1990;335:1078–80. [ Links ]

13. Barnes CG, Yazici H. Behçet's syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38:1171–4. [ Links ]

14. International Team for the Revision of the International Criteria for Behçet's Disease (ITR-ICBD). The International Criteria for Behçet's Disease (ICBD):a collaborative study of 27 countries on the sensitivity and specificity of the new criteria. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:338–47. [ Links ]

15. Araujo MAL, Uesono J, Machado NMDS, Pinto VM, Amaral E. Brazilian protocol for sexually transmitted infections 2020:approaching sexually active individuals. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2021;54:2020628. [ Links ]

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have obtained the written informed consent of the patients or subjects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in possession of this document.

FundingNone.

Received: September 19, 2022; Accepted: November 07, 2022

*Corresponding author: Giulia Marchetti E-mail: dra.giuliamarchetti@gmail.com

Conflicts of interest

None.

Creative Commons License Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology. Published by Permanyer. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license