SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.7 número4Hepatite Colestática Aguda Secundária a Amoxicilina/Ácido Clavulânico índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Gazeta Médica

versión impresa ISSN 2183-8135versión On-line ISSN 2184-0628

Gaz Med vol.7 no.4 Queluz dic. 2020  Epub 22-Jul-2021

https://doi.org/10.29315/gm.v7i4.409 

Carta ao Diretor

Use of COVID-19 as an Illegitimate Excuse, or as a Scape-Goat

Uso da COVID-19 como Desculpa Ilegítima ou como Bode Expiatório

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva1 

1 Independent Researcher, Japan.


Keywords: COVID-19; Pandemics/ethics; Social Justice

Palavras-chave: COVID-19; Justiça Social; Pandemia/ética

Dear Gazeta Médica Editors,

The SARS-CoV-2 virus, which induced the respiratory coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has already claimed (November 6, 2020) over 1.2 million lives and infected over 48.5 million people globally.1 Societies, economies and personal lives may be affected for years to come, either directly, as a possible yearly resurgence, even with a vaccine, similar to seasonal influenza, as vestigial left-over health (“long COVID”2), or as long-term psycho-sociological effects.3

Naturally, and it goes without saying, that those that are directly affected by COVID-19, even those recovering from it and suffering secondary and continued symptoms, have the most valid excuse (practical, psychological, moral, etc.) to “use” COVID-19 as an excuse, for example, not to be positive or participatory, or not to fulfill or complete a task or responsibility such as work. These individuals need the constant support of health care systems and society.

Yet, one must be aware of, and reproach, those who abuse COVID-19 to justify their own selfish needs, even as countless others around them suffer. We ought to be aware of those who use COVID-19, even if it does not affect them, i.e., the “onlookers”),4 as an excuse. This selfish lack of empathy that Bramble4 refers to in “onlookers” is a different category of society that is aware of the pain and suffering of others but is either unable or unwilling to empathize with their struggle. Even if such individuals pursue a selfish personal agenda, almost impassive of the suffering of others, and even if we might disagree with their way of life and/or thinking, we are not in a position to judge their selfishness, and it would be unwise to morally judge their inability to suffer alongside others’ suffering. They are human, after all, not saints.

However, the individuals that do merit being called out, and even investigated, are those that are using COVID-19 to abuse others, or their frailty, such as medical (and other, e.g., insurance) scammers, tricksters and frauds, the most evident being through cybercrime.5 There are also those who are being discriminated against,6 and those trapped by digital inequality.7 In addition to these blatant cases of the abuse of COVID-19 for selfish purposes are those that use the disease, or the pandemic, to obtain personal freedoms or gains (financial, or other, such as time, benefits, perks, etc.) based on false pretenses and excuses.

I believe that the following excuses of COVID-19 by “onlookers” and others not directly impacted by this coronavírus are illegitimate excuses: 1) to be lazy, procrastinate, or lie; 2) to obtain undeserving rewards (e.g., holidays, sick leave, exclusive travel, extended holiday, work from home, or exemption from tasks or duties). There may be other reasons why COVID-19 has, is, or will be used as an “excuse”, and these will likely become evidente over time as academics and media record personal experiences from around the globe. One case, a retraction from the journal Science, assigned disorganization and miscommunication of the research team to fatal errors, in part caused or influenced by the pandemic, that led to the paper’s retraction.8

In a system ridden with weaknesses caused by COVID-19 and failures to respond adequately to the pandemic, and where humanity finds itself in a state of insecurity and frailty, it may be difficult to detect such abusive individuals, or only long after the abuse has taken place and the damage, direct or secondary, has been done.

References

1. John Hopkins University. Coronavirus Resource Center. [accessed November 6, 2020]. Available from: Available from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html . [ Links ]

2. Mahase E. Covid-19: What do we know about “long covid”? BMJ. 2020;370:m2815. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2815. [ Links ]

3. Kontoangelos K, Economou M, Papageorgiou C. Mental health effects of COVID-19 pandemia: A review of clinical and psychological traits. Psychiatry Investig. 2020;17:491-505. doi: 10.30773/pi.2020.0161. [ Links ]

4. Bramble B. Pandemic Ethics: 8 Big Questions of COVID-19. Sydney: Bartleby Books; 2020. [ Links ]

5. Buil-Gil D, Miró-Llinares F, Moneva A, Kemp S, Díaz-Castaño N. Cybercrime and shifts in opportunities during COVID-19: a preliminary analysis in the UK. Eur Soc. 2020 (in press). doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1804973. [ Links ]

6. Teixeira da Silva JA. Stigmatization, discrimination, racism, injustice, and inequalities in the COVID-19 era. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9:484-5. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.87. [ Links ]

7. Beaunoyer E, Dupéré S, Guitton MJ. COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Comput Human Behav. 2020;111:106424. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424. [ Links ]

8. Wu Y, Zhu B, Huang M, Liu L, Shi Q, Akbar M, et al. Proton transport enabled by a field-induced metallic state in a semiconductor heterostructure. Science. 2020;369:184-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz9139. Retraction in: Science. 2020;370:179. [ Links ]

Responsabilidades éticas

Suporte financeiro: O presente trabalho não foi suportado por nenhum subsídio ou bolsa

Proveniência e revisão por pares: Não comissionado; revisão externa por pares

Ethical disclosures

Financial support: This work has not received any contribution grant or scholarship

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed

Received: November 01, 2020; Accepted: November 03, 2020; Published: November 12, 2020

Corresponding Author/Autor Correspondente: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva [jaimetex@yahoo.com] P. O. Box 7, Miki-cho post office, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken, 761-0799, Japan

Conflitos de interesse:

Os autores declaram não possuir conflitos de interesse.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License