SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número3Editorial - Radiologia no Serviço de UrgênciaIndicações para Utilização da Cintigrafia Óssea no Cancro da Mama índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Acta Radiológica Portuguesa

versão impressa ISSN 2183-1351

Acta Radiol Port vol.34 no.3 Lisboa dez. 2022  Epub 30-Dez-2022

https://doi.org/10.25748/arp.26633 

Artigos Originais

Calcificações Coronárias em TC do Tórax em Doentes COVID-19: Prevalência e Impacto Clínico

Coronary Calcifications on Non-Gated Chest CT in COVID-19 Patients: Prevalence and Impact on Outcomes

1Serviço de Radiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal

2Cardiovascular Research and Development Center, Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal


Resumo:

Introdução: Estudos recentes demonstraram a relação complexa entre infeção por COVID-19, doença cardiovascular e mau prognóstico. Neste contexto, a avaliação das calcificações das artérias coronárias (CAC) pode ser uma ferramenta adicional na estratificação do risco clínico destes doentes.

Métodos: Neste estudo retrospetivo foram recrutados 105 doentes consecutivos infetados com COVID-19, que realizaram TC do tórax sem gating cardíaco, numa única instituição entre Abril e Julho de 2020. As CAC foram avaliadas por dois observadores independentes e classificadas como ausentes, ligeiras, moderadas ou severas. O processo clínico dos doentes foi consultado para informação sobre variáveis demográficas, proteína C reativa à admissão, número de dias hospitalizado, necessidade de suporte ventilatório e morte. Os relatórios originais das TC foram consultados para verificar se mencionavam a presença de CAC.

Resultados: Sessenta e seis (63%) dos doentes avaliados apresentavam CAC na TC. Doentes com qualquer grau de CAC tiveram maior probabilidade de precisar de suporte ventilatório (OR: 3,6) e de morrer (OR: 8,9). Doentes com CAC severas tiveram maior probabilidade de precisar de suporte ventilatório (OR: 4,1), e com CAC moderadas maior probabilidade de morrer (OR: 11,1). Doentes com CAC estiveram internados durante mais tempo (p=0,038). Apenas 21% dos relatórios originais (22 doentes) incluíram informação sobre CAC, mas estas foram mencionadas em 52% (12 doentes) dos relatórios dos doentes com CAC severas.

Conclusão: As CAC estão associadas a pior prognóstico em doentes infetados com COVID-19, e podem ser usadas como uma ferramenta adicional na estratificação do risco clínico destes doentes. As CAC devem ser incluídas no relatório do radiologista sempre que observadas.

Palavras-chave: COVID-19; TC; Doenças cardiovasculares.

Abstract:

Introduction: Recent studies have demonstrated the complex interplay between COVID-19 infection, cardiovascular disease, and poor outcomes. In this context, the evaluation of coronary artery calcifications (CAC) may provide additional risk stratification in COVID-19 patients.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 105 consecutive COVID-19 patients who underwent non-gated chest CT at our department from April to July 2020. CAC were assessed by two independent observers and graded as absent, mild, moderate, and severe. Clinical files were checked for basic demographic variables, C-reactive protein at admission, number of hospitalization days, need for ventilatory support and death. Original CT reports were checked for mention of CAC.

Results: Sixty-six patients had CAC on chest CT. Patients with any CAC were more likely to need ventilatory support (OR: 3.6) and to die (OR: 8.9). Patients with severe CAC were more likely to need ventilatory support (OR: 4.1) and with moderate CAC more likely to die (OR: 11.1). Patients with CAC had longer hospitalizations (mean: 18.5 days) than patients without CAC (mean: 12.4 days, p=0.038). Original radiological reports included CAC in only 22 (21%) of patients, but 12 (52.2%) of the severe CAC were included in the report.

Conclusion: CAC are associated with a worse prognosis in COVID patients and may be used as an additional risk stratification tool in this patient population. CAC should be reported whenever visible.

Keywords: COVID-19; CT scan; Cardiovascular diseases.

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of death worldwide, particularly in Europe1. In Portugal, cardiovascular diseases accounted for 29.4% of total mortality in 20172. Interventions targeting modifiable risk factors and preventive drug therapies reduce future cardiovascular events. Hence, early diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases has the potential to reduce future morbidity and mortality.

Coronary artery calcifications (CAC) are associated with increased number of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), both in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, and are considered an atherosclerosis biomarker3. Current guidelines recommend CAC scoring as a tool to reclassify cardiovascular risk upwards and downwards in addition to conventional risk factors4.

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are associated with worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Conversely, COVID-19 patients with pre-existing CV diseases are at increased risk of conversion from an asymptomatic subclinical state to unstable disease, with plaque instability and higher risk of acute coronary syndrome5,6,7.

In this study we assess the association between visual CAC scoring on non-gated chest CT examinations of COVID-19 patients and clinical outcomes. In addition, we evaluate the report rate of CAC in this population.

Methods

Population

We prospectively enrolled 105 consecutive RT-PCR COVID-19 positive patients who underwent an ungated chest CT, between April and July 2020. Clinical files were checked for C-reactive protein (CRP) at admission and number of hospitalized days. Clinical endpoints were ventilatory support (invasive and non-invasive) and mortality. Two patients were not hospitalized and were excluded from the clinical endpoint analysis. Taking in account the observational and retrospective nature of this study, the need for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee.

Image analysis

The presence of coronary calcifications was evaluated by two independent observers - observer 1, a radiologist with 8 years of experience in thoracic imaging, and observer 2, with 3 years of experience in thoracic imaging. CAC were scored using a simple visual ordinal score on a whole patient basis, as described in the BSCCT/BSTI guidelines, using the categories absent, mild, moderate, and severe (figure 1 ). Discordant cases were solved by simple consensus. The Kappa coefficient of Cohen was used to calculate the interobserver variability. The original exam reports were reviewed for the mention of CAC.

Figure 1: Axial non-gated CT of four different patients exemplifying the CAC score. A - no calcifications. B - mild calcifications. C - moderate calcifications. D - severe calcifications. 

Statistical analysis

The following statistical tests were used:

  1. T-test: compare the age means in relation to ventilatory support and death;

  2. Chi-square: compare gender differences and presence of CAC across the outcomes;

  3. Mann-Whitney U test: compare CAC scores across the outcomes; difference in CRP values and presence of CAC; difference in hospitalized days and presence of CAC (in patients who survived).

Univariable logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of needing ventilatory support and death in relation to the presence of CAC.

Statistical significance was defined at 0.05 (two-tailed). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 27 (IBM).

Results

The basic demographic and clinical variables, presence of CAC and CAC scores according to the clinical endpoints (ventilatory support and death) are presented in table 1. The age range was 20-98 years (65.2 ( 16.6, mean ( standard deviation). There was a small male predilection with 54 (52.4%) males and 49 (47.6%) females.

The median hospitalization time was 12 days (IQR: 13 days), ranging from 2 to 82 days. The mean CRP at admission was 77.9 mg/dL (( 86.2 mg/dL).

A total of 33 (32%) of patients needed ventilatory support and 14 (13.6%) died.

Sixty-six patients had CAC on chest CT.

Table 1: Basic clinical variables, presence of CAC and CAC score acording to the clinical endpoints (need for ventilatory support and death). Statistically significant differences are marked in bold. 

CAC scoring and reporting

The Kappa coefficient of Cohen for the two observers was 0.72 (standard-error: 0.054). After application of the simple consensus method, 39 (37.1%) patients were classified as having no CAC (absent), 30 (28.6%) as mild, 13 (12.4%) as moderate and 23 (21.9%) as severe (table 2).

Table 2: Interobserver variability of CAC score and results after simple consensus. 

The original report rates of CAC according to the different CAC scores are shown in table 3. CAC were reported in 22 (21%) of the original reports and in 21 (31.8%) of the patients classified as having CAC. Report rates were higher for patients with severe calcifications (52.2%) compared to mild calcifications (13.3%) (p<0.001).

Table 3: Original CAC report rates in relation to CAC scores. 

CAC and clinical endpoints

Univariable logistic regression results are shown in table 4. Patients with CAC had an OR of 3.6 (p=0.012) of needing ventilatory support and 8.9 (p=0.039) of death.

Table 4: Univariable logistic regression showing the OR for ventilatory support and death in relation to presence of CAC. Significant OR are flagged in bold. 

In patients who survived, hospitalization days were higher if they had CAC (p = 0.038). There was not a statistically significant difference in CRP values at admission in relation to CAC (table 5).

Table 5: Difference in CRP values and hospitalization days in relation to the presence of CAC. Significant differences are flagged in bold. 

Discussion

Imaging indications in COVID-19 patients are controversial and may vary according to country and resource availability. A multinational statement by the Fleischer society recommends chest imaging in patients with COVID-19 and worsening respiratory status and in patients with moderate to severe clinical features of disease and high pre-test probability8. In this way, chest CT is not only an important tool for diagnosis and severity grading, but also to assess extra-pulmonary manifestations7. In fact, our study showed the presence of CAC was associated with worse patient prognosis, particularly by increasing the risk of ventilatory support (OR: 3.6), number of hospitalized days (12.4 days vs 18.5 days) and death (OR: 8.9). Although statistical significance was not achieved, there was also a tendency for higher CRP values in patients with CAC (92.3 mg/dL vs 52.1 mg/dL). Recently published studies have achieved similar results9,10,11 and support the role of CAC as an imaging biomarker for adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

Although the importance of traditional CV risk factors cannot be overemphasized, current evidence shows a significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction in the short, medium and long-term for patients with acute bacterial and viral infections12. In the particular case of COVID-19 infection, three main mechanisms have been described that justify worse CV outcomes7 - multi-organ failure and consequent cardiac injury secondary to severe hypoxia caused by the respiratory syndrome; endothelial dysfunction and myocardium damage due to ACE2 binding; activation of the inflammatory cascade and subsequent cytokine storm. Cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 infection have been extensively described in the literature, and include myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and cardiac arrithmyas6,13,14.,15. Conversely, patients with chronic CV diseases like ischemic heart disease or heart failure are known to have worse prognosis when infected with COVD-1916,17.

The association between CAC and cardiovascular CV disease is well established. During the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial, the hazard ratio (HR) for coronary disease death was 2.09 in the patients with mild, 3.86 with moderate and 6.95 with severe calcifications, when compared to the absence of calcifications18. Also, the visual scoring of CAC was found to be a predictor of all-cause and CV mortality, independent of smoking status19. Visual grading and assessment of CAC is therefore recommended by the SCCT20 and BSTI3 guidelines in all chest CT due to its simplicity, good interobserver variability and correlation with Agatson score. In our study, visual grading of the CAC was reproducible, with a substantial Kappa coefficient (0.72), concordant with the results reported in the literature18.

Thus, visual CAC scoring is a simple and reliable method to provide additional prognostication in COVD-19 patients, available in all patients undergoing chest CT and not requiring additional image post-processing. In addition, it may provide the first indication of coronary artery disease presence.

In our cohort, only 21% of the original reports included information about CAC. However, considering only the patients with CAC, 31.8% were mentioned in the original report, suggesting that denial by omission may have occurred. Previous studies reported similar results - one study in 2013 found that CAC was recorded in the radiologist report of non-contrast chest CT exams in only 44% of the patients with CAC21; another study in 2015 found unreported potentially relevant cardiovascular findings in 39.6% of patients undergoing chest CT for pulmonary interstitial disease, lung cancer staging or PE assessment22.

Our recommendation is to report CAC in all chest CT examinations, whenever they are visible. Specific indications for different CAC grades are currently not defined, and therefore the most important attitude is to report their presence.

Clinical implications of the reported findings were not evaluated, and most physicians may be unaware of the importance of these findings. A recent study found that only 5% of patients with reported CAC on non-gated chest CT had their regular prescription changed23. Nevertheless, the report rate of CAC was low. CT scans of COVID-19 patients were all acquired in the emergency setting. We do not know if in a different setting the result would have been different.

Our study has limitations. First, its retrospective single center nature. Age correction was not performed, and CAC is known to be strongly associated with age. However, age was not statically different in patients who needed ventilatory support, ICU admission or died.

Also, patients with previously known coronary disease were not excluded, which may have introduced an outcome bias as these patients may already be under treatment.

Finally, lung parenchyma involvement by COVID-19 was not considered is this study. A previous study developed an artificial neural network to estimate COVID-19 disease severity, which showed correlation with clinical outcomes24,25. In the future, it would be interesting to incorporate CAC information in this algorithm to further stratify and improve prognostication of COVID-19 patients.

Conclusion

In conclusion, CAC are associated with worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients and can be used as a biomarker for adverse clinical outcomes. Radiologists should be aware of the importance of this finding and record it on every chest CT examination when present.

References

1. Wilkins E, Wilson L, Wickramasinghe K, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017, European Heart Network, Brussels. Eur Cardiovasc Dis Stat. 2017;34:3028-34. [ Links ]

2. INE, Lisboa. Causas de Morte 2017 Em Portugal.; 2017. ISBN 978-989-25-0481-0 [ Links ]

3. Williams MC, Abbas A, Tirr E, et al. Reporting incidental coronary, aortic valve and cardiac calcification on non-gated thoracic computed tomography, a consensus statement from the BSCI/ BSCCT and BSTI. Br J Radiol. 2021;94: 20200894. [ Links ]

4. Visseren FLJ, MacH F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3227-337. [ Links ]

5. Saba L, Gerosa C, Wintermark M, et al. Can COVID19 trigger the plaque vulnerability-a Kounis syndrome warning for “asymptomatic subjects.” Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020;10:1352-5. [ Links ]

6. Xiong TY, Redwood S, Prendergast B, Chen M. Coronaviruses and the cardiovascular system: acute and long-term implications. Eur Heart J . 2020;41:1798-800. [ Links ]

7. Onnis C, Muscogiuri G, Paolo Bassareo P, et al. Non-invasive coronary imaging in patients with COVID-19: a narrative review. Elsevier; 2022. [ Links ]

8. Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB, et al. The role of chest imaging in patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chest. 2020;158:106-16. [ Links ]

9. Sean Y, Finkelstein M, Manna S, et al. Coronary artery calcification in COVID-19 patients: an imaging biomarker for adverse clinical outcomes. Clin Imaging. 2021;77:1-8. [ Links ]

10. Cosyns B, Motoc A, Luchian ML, Lochy S, Belsack D. Coronary calcium score in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:2698. [ Links ]

11. Dillinger JG, Benmessaoud FA, Pezel T, et al. Coronary artery aalcification and complications in patients with COVID-19. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging . 2020;13:2468-70. [ Links ]

12. Musher DM, Abers MS, Corrales-Medina VF. Acute infection and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:171-6. [ Links ]

13. Madjid M, Safavi-Naeini P, Solomon SD, Vardeny O. Potential effects of coronaviruses on the cardiovascular system: a review. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:831-40. [ Links ]

14. Fried JA, Ramasubbu K, Bhatt R, et al. The variety of cardiovascular presentations of COVID-19. Circulation. 2020;141:1930-6. [ Links ]

15. Trêpa M, Hipólito Reis A, Oliveira M. Cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 infection [complicações cardiovasculares associadas à infeção por COVID-19]. Acta Med Port. 2021;34:608-14. [ Links ]

16. Reilev M, Kristensen KB, Pottegård A, et al. Characteristics and predictors of hospitalization and death in the first 11 122 cases with a positive RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 in Denmark: A nationwide cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49:1468-81. [ Links ]

17. Li B, Yang J, Zhao F, et al. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular metabolic diseases on COVID-19 in China. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109:531-8. [ Links ]

18. Chiles C, Duan F, Gladish GW, Ravenel JG. Association of coronary artery calcification and mortality in the national lung screening trial. Radiology. 2015; 276:82-90. [ Links ]

19. Watts JR, Sonavane SK, Snell-Bergeon J, Nath H. Visual scoring of coronary artery calcification in lung cancer screening computed tomography: Association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk. Coron Artery Dis. 2015;26:157-62. [ Links ]

20. Hecht HS, Cronin P, Blaha MJ, et al. 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography and society of thoracic radiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017;11:74-84. [ Links ]

21. Williams KA, Kim JT, Holohan KM. Frequency of unrecognized, unreported, or underreported coronary artery and cardiovascular calcification on noncardiac chest CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013;7:167-72. [ Links ]

22. Sverzellati N, Arcadi T, Salvolini L, et al. Under-reporting of cardiovascular findings on chest CT. Radiol Medica. 2016;121:190-9. [ Links ]

23. Uretsky S, Chokshi N, Kobrinski T, et al. The interplay of physician awareness and reporting of incidentally found coronary artery calcium on the clinical management of patients who underwent noncontrast chest computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:1513-7. [ Links ]

24. Carvalho ARS, Guimarães A, Werberich GM, et al. COVID-19 chest computed tomography to stratify severity and disease extension by artificial neural network computer-aided diagnosis. Front Med. 2020;7:1-11. [ Links ]

25. Carvalho ARS, Guimarães A, Garcia T de SO, et al. Estimating COVID-19 pneumonia extent and severity from chest computed tomography. Front Physiol. 2021;12:1-12 [ Links ]

Ethical disclosures

Financing Support: This study was financed by national funds through FCT Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P., under the scope of the Cardiovascular R&D Center - UnIC (UIDB/00051/2020 and UIDP/00051/2020).

Recebido: 04 de Março de 2022; Aceito: 28 de Abril de 2022

Address João Carvalho, Serviço de Radiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo do Prof. Abel Salazar,4099-001 Porto, Portugal, e-mail: joaogomescarvalho@gmail.com

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Confidentiality of data: The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of data from patients.

Protection of human and animal subjects: The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) and ARP 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use.

Creative Commons License Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons