SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue2Evaluating habit in exercisers: testing the self-report behavioral automaticity indexERRATUM author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Motricidade

Print version ISSN 1646-107XOn-line version ISSN 2182-2972

Motri. vol.17 no.2 Ribeira de Pena June 2021  Epub Oct 26, 2021

https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.21116 

REVIEW ARTICLE

The use of infrared thermography in endurance athletes: a systematic review

A utilização da termografia infravermelha em atletas de endurance: uma revisão sistemática

1Departamento de Pós-Graduação, Escola de Educação Física do Exército - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.

2Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - Curitiba (PR), Brazil.

3Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências do Exercício e do Esporte, Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.


ABSTRACT

Infrared thermography has become increasingly common in sports assessment and has grown a lot over the past few years. Our objective was to identify the assessment protocols and the skin temperature behavior of practitioners of endurance sports. A systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA recommendations between the 1st and the 31st of March 2020, at MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS, SPORT Discus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Scielo, using combinations with 11 descriptors for “thermography” and 6 descriptors for “endurance training”. It was identified 24 different regions of interest evaluated region in endurance sports. The acclimatization time was respected in 75% of the selected studies, and the thermal images were acquired predominantly in three moments: before the test, immediately after the test, and 10 minutes after the test. It was observed that Tskin decreased in the initial moments and increased after exercise. It can be concluded that the regions of interest used were mostly the specific muscle recruited in each modality, with emphasis on the muscle groups of the lower limbs, and after this initial decrease in temperature, the thermal response is mainly dependent on the duration and intensity of exercise.

KEYWORDS: endurance training; thermography; cycling; running

INTRODUCTION

Maintaining physical performance, especially in long-term events, requires meticulous preparation (Hermand, Chabert, & Hue., 2019), and the physiological imbalance can result in muscle fatigue, damage, and changes in the systemic inflammatory response (Mara et al., 2013).

The achieved performance during prolonged exercise depends on several physiological factors: (a) the capacity to produce and use energy in a fast and prolonged way (Arellano & Kram, 2014) (b) the oxygen uptake (VO2max) as an indicator of the athlete’s ability to generate energy in the medium and long terms, and (c) the energy cost that represent the economy of energy expenditure at high intensity (Swinnen, Kipp, & Kram, 2018).

Another factor related to performance is the skin temperature’s ability to dissipate heat in muscle efforts (Bertucci, Arfaoui, Janson, & Polidori, 2013a; Ludwig et al., 2016), transferring the heat from the deepest tissues to the surface (Ammer & Formenti, 2016). At rest, it varies between 34°C and 36°C (Raymann, Swaab, & Van Someren, 2008), and it is performed by changes in the vascular tone of the skin and increased sweating. The blood flow is directed to the active muscles and the myocardium in order to supply their metabolic needs (Akimov & Son’kin, 2011).

The evaporation of sweat represents the main mechanism to reduce skin temperature during exercise (Chudecka & Lubkowska, 2010). At the beginning of the exercise, there may be a reduction in temperature due to sweating on the skin surface and the use of blood in the required muscles (Fernandes et al., 2012). However, in endurance sports, a constant increase in central temperature (Tcore) and skin temperature (Tskin) is observed, especially in high-temperature environments, which limits the performance and can increase the risk of exhaustion and heat stroke (Nybo, 2010).

To analyze the thermoregulation process and understand how this energy is dissipated, infrared thermography (IRT) can be used (Arfaoui, Polidori, Taiar, & Pop, 2012). Its main advantages are the non-invasive method; monitoring a specific region of interest (local analysis) or throughout the body (global analysis); freedom of movement during exercise; the lack of interference in the processes of heat loss by radiation, convection and evaporation; the accuracy; reproducibility; and the possibility of recording videos, with certain camera models (Fernandes et al., 2014).

Although the number of studies with IRT has increased in the last decade (Moreira et al., 2017), some methodological aspects remain controversial. One of them is the definition of regions of interest (ROIs) in thermal images because the Tskin can be affected by several factors of the daily routine, including nutrition, sweating, hours of sleep, and physical activity, as well as environmental factors (Fernández-Cuevas et al., 2015).

Working with athlete evaluation requires a careful evaluation to not interfere with the training routine and competitions. So, the definition of the evaluation moments and the adjustments to the protocols are extremely important to minimize interference in the athlete’s routine. Previous systematic reviews (Jimenez-Pavon et al., 2019; Fernández-Cuevas et al., 2015; Fernandes et al., 2012) concluded the effectiveness of checking Tskin using IRT. However, none of these reviews detailed the assessment protocols and Tskin behavior of endurance sports practitioners. As a result of this knowledge gap, the aim of this study was to identify the assessment protocols and the Tskin behavior of endurance sports practitioners.

METHODS

Protocol and register

This systematic review was written according to the PRISMA recommendations (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman, 2015) and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number CRD4202018493.

Inclusion criteria

In this systematic review, experimental studies were included that met the following inclusion criteria (Moola et al., 2015): studies related to endurance sports, with trained athletes, of both sexes and aged between 16 and 49 years. In the outcome, the type of camera used, the ROIs of interest, the used protocols, and the results were considered.

Search strategy

The search occurred from March 1st to March 31st, 2020, in the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), SCOPUS, SPORT Discus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane and Scielo. The following keywords were used as descriptors for Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) or words in the text: thermography, skin temperature, infrared image, endurance sports, cycling, running, marathon, triathlon, and their synonyms. The following search phrase was obtained using the Boolean logic operators “AND” between descriptors and “OR” between synonyms: “Thermography” OR “Skin Temperature” OR “Skin thermal” OR “Infrared imaging” OR “Infrared thermography” OR “Infrared Camera” OR “Thermographic pictures” OR “Thermographic images” OR “Thermal images” AND “ Endurance training” OR “Bicycling” OR “Running” OR “Marathon” OR “Triathlon”. In addition, bibliographic references from other sources were explored to find studies that, perhaps, have not been retrieved from the databases.

Studies selection

Two independent evaluators selected the studies, and a third one resolved the disagreements found. This procedure was performed in all phases of the present study. Experimental studies that evaluated Tskin in endurance sports were selected in this systematic review. Studies of systematic reviews, case studies, reviews with meta-analysis, and abstracts (studies without full text) were excluded. Studies with a publication date prior to the year 2000 were also excluded due to the low resolution of images from older cameras.

Data collection process

The following data were extracted from the studies: profile of the participants, sex, height, total body weight, percentage of fat, maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max), ROIs used in the assessment, Tskin, type of camera, and the outcome.

Methodological quality and bias’s risk

Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane ACROBAT-NRSI scale. The instrument assesses seven domains: 1) confusion, 2) selection of study participants, 3) measurement of the intervention, 4) non-receipt of the assigned intervention, 5) losses, 6) measurement of the outcomes, 7) selective reporting of the outcomes. The first three are pre-intervention domains, and the other four are post-intervention domains. For each domain, the ratings “low”, “moderate”, “severe”, “critical”, and “no information” are assigned. The overall risk of bias in each study is the domain with the highest risk of bias (Sterne et al., 2016).

RESULTS

Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the studies included in the present study.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the included studies in the systematic review. 

A total of 1128 studies were extracted from databases. The duplicated ones were excluded (421), and 16 were recovered by manual searches. From 723 studies to trial, 655 were excluded by not attending the inclusion criteria.

Table 1 shows the sample characteristic of 407 individuals who participated in these studies (380 male and 27 female). All studies presented the mean age, body weight, and height, except for Tanda (2016).

Table 1. Characteristics of the sample in the studies included in the systematic review. 

Article Study

  • Sample

  • (n)

  • Age

  • (years)

  • Weight

  • (Kg)

  • Height

  • (cm)

  • %

  • Body fat

  • VO2max

  • (mL·min-1·kg)

1 Perez-Guarner et al., 2019

  • n= 17 (11 M and 6 F)

  • Half marathon recreational runners

41± 6 66.5± 10 174± 0.10 14± 6.1 NI
2 Priego-Quesada et al., 2019

  • n= 10 (M)

  • Recreational triathletes

40± 6 78± 12 176± 0,04 14± 5 63± 6
3 Tumilty et al., 2019

  • n= 29 (M)

  • Competition runners

29.3± 5.8 65.5± 7.8 169.9± 6.2 NI NI
4 Rodriguez-Sanz et al., 2019

  • n= 57 (M)

  • Competition runners

42.82± 6.97 73.19± 8.13 173.68± 9.79 NI NI
5 Priego-Quesada et al., 2017

  • n= 22 (17 M and 5 F)

  • Runners

34± 5 72± 12.9 175.7± 7.3 NI NI
6 Balci et al., 2016

  • n= 11 (M)

  • Cycling, athletics and soccer athletes

22.2± 3.7 73.8± 6.9 181± 6.3 12.6± 4.2 54± 9.9
7 Jensen et al., 2016

  • n= 14 (13 M and 1 F)

  • Recreational runners

28.1± 8.2 69,9 ± 7,5 177,6 ± 7,8 22,1 ± 1,7 NI
8 Ludwig et al., 2016

  • n= 7 (M)

  • Elite cyclists

20.3± 1.8 70.14± 6.00 177± 0.03 8.64± 2.25 66.89± 4.55
9 Priego-Quesada et al., 2016a

  • n= 19 (M)

  • Cyclists

29.5± 9.8 76.6± 9.2 179.2± 6.6 NI NI
10 Priego-Quesada et al., 2016b

  • n= 16 (M)

  • Cyclists that are club competitors

29± 10 77± 9 178.7± 6.5 NI NI
11 Priego-Quesada et al., 2016c

  • n= 14 (M)

  • Cyclists that are club competitors

29.9± 8.3 72.8± 10.6 175± 0.8 NI NI
12 Tanda, 2016

  • n= 10 (M)

  • Recreational runners

NI NI NI NI NI
13 Chudecka et al., 2015

  • n= 18 (M)

  • Rowing club athletes

20.77± 1.78 82.33± 7.19 184.11± 4.56 NI NI

  • n= 16 (M)

  • Handball players

22.54± 2.01 86.27± 7.17 187.25± 4.62 NI NI
14 Priego-Quesada et al., 2015b

  • n= 44 (29 M and 15 F)

  • Runners

29.3± 5.8 65.5± 7.8 169.9± 6.2 NI NI
15 Priego-Quesada et al., 2015a

  • n= 14 (M)

  • Healthy cyclists

28.9± 8.3 72.8± 10.6 175.8± 8 NI NI
16 James et al., 2014

  • n= 14 (M)

  • Recreational runners

38± 11 77.3± 7.1 179± 8 NI 57.3± 4.0
17 Abate et al., 2013

  • n= 40 (M)

  • 20 trained runners (a)

  • 20 untrained individuals (b)

  • 26± 5.3 (a)

  • 26.3± 4.9 (b)

  • 70.5± 4.8 (a)

  • 74.8± 5.1 (b)

  • 175.2± 3.3 (a)

  • 174.4± 5.3 (b)

  • 22.9± 1.0 (a)

  • 24.4± 1.4 (b)

NI
18 Bertucci et al., 2013

  • n= 2 (M)

  • Competition cyclists

16± 0.0 63.0± 0.0 179± 0.0 10.4± 0.0 2.87± 0.20
19 Smith and Havenith, 2011

  • n= 9 (M)

  • Elite and sub-elite runners

23± 3 73.8± 5.0 178.5± 4.1 10.9± 4.9 70.2± 13

  • n= 9 (M)

  • Elite and sub-elite runners

24± 5.7 73.6± 6.9 181.6± 4.3 11.8± 4.7 57.9± 11
20 Merla et al., 2010

  • n= 15 (M)

  • University runners

25.2± 3.1 71.4± 4.2 175± 0.15 NI NI

NI: not informed; kg: kilogram; cm: centimeter; O 2 max: maximal oxygen consumption; M: male; F: female.

The ROIs were presented in Figure 2, where 24 different regions were used in the researchers’ assessments. The most evaluated region in endurance sports was the thigh.

Figure 2. Regions of interest. 

Table 2 presents the type of the camera, evaluation protocols, the camera position, and the outcomes of the analyzed studies. Table 3 presents the methodological quality and risk of bias analysis of the selected studies.

Table 2. Results of the selected studies. 

Studies

  • Type of camera

  • software

Evaluation protocol Clothing Result
Perez-Guarner et al., 2019 C: FLIR E-60; R: 320x 240; S: TRP FLIR Pre-race: 48h, 24h; Race: 21Km; Post-race: 24h and 48h AT: 10min, TR: 23.2± 0.1°C; RHA: 20± 1%, TS: < 0.05º C; ES: 0.98, Ac: 2% Underwear skinT in the posterior upper limb and anterior leg, after the half marathon. > skinT the day before the race for most ROIs.
Priego-Quesada et al., 2019 C: FLIR E-60; R: 320x 240; S: TRP FLIR. Mom 1 - pre camp. Mom 2 - 1st day camp. Mom 3 - 2nd day camp. Jump test: 5 to 20 squat reps (warm-up)+ 3 maximum jumps with 30sec intervals. AT: 10 min; TR: 18°C, RHA: 44%, 54% and 63% (pre, test 1 and 2); TS: 0.05°C, ES: 0.98; Ac: ± 2°C. NI > skinT after training in all ROIs. > max skinT in the posterior thigh, knee and posterior leg.
Tumilty et al., 2019 C: FLIR T450SC; R: 320x 240; S: FLIR Tools (FLIR Systems Inc). A tests session of 30 min, for nine weeks. AT: 15min; TR: 21.8± 0.46°C, RHA: 47.3± 8.1%; Spectrum: 7.5-13μm, TS: 0.05°C; ES: 0.95 NI The IRT demonstrated high consistency and minimal variations in the Achilles tendon at rest during the 9 weeks.
Rodriguez-Sanz et al., 2019

  • C: FLIR/SC3000/

  • QWIP; R: 320x 240

5 images of the gastrocnemius taken before and after Ru at 8Km/h for 15min. TR: 24.1± 1 C; RHA: 45%± 10%, Spectrum: 8-9 μm; TS: 0.02K (30°C). NI After the exercise, skinT was significantly warmer for the participants in all the variables for the gastrocnemius muscle.
Priego-Quesada et al., 2017 C: FLIR E-60; R: 320x 240; S: TRP FLIR. Mom 1 (PT) - maximum effort for 5 min (400 m track). Mom 2 - 10min warm-up, at 1% incline (60% MAS)+ 20min (80% MAS). Measurement: BT, IAT and 10 min after ending. AT: 10min; TR: 22.9± 1.3°C, RHA: 44.4± 12.1%; TS: < 50mK (30°C), Ac: ± 1°C. Shorts Medial ROIs showed higher temperatures than lateral ROIs. Similar skinTs were observed in ΔT and ΔT 10 of the hindfoot.
Balci et al., 2016 C and S: Testo 875-1 ThermaCA; R: 160x 120. Mom 1 - familiarization; Mom 2 (max test) - 70 to 85% Max HR (90 rpm), (1x 4min)+ (3x 2min)+ (nx 1min until exhaustion). > 27 to 36W/stage. Mom 3 (submaximal test): 4x 5min (until ventilatory threshold (50 to 60% Max HR Reserve> 27 to 36W at each stage). TR: 21.3± 0.4°C; RHA: 64.5± 2.5%; TS: < 80mK (0.08°C); ES: 0.98. Shorts,sneakers and socks < skinT in the submaximal test until min 7.58± 1.03. After this, > skinT. In the maximal test, < skinT during the whole period and it did not increase in any Mom.
Jensen et al., 2016 C: AXIS Q1922; R: 640x 480; S: AXIS Communications Mom 1 - warm-up 4min work 30sec recovery. Speed: 3, 5 and 7Km/h Mom 2 -- 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18Km/h (Ru) TS: < 100mK; ES: NI. NI > skinT with> Speed. It was not significant between 16 and 18km/h. The average values of the optical flow for all the 14 individuals demonstrated a strong correlation with oxygen uptake.
Ludwig et al., 2016 C: AVIO TVS700; R: 320x 240; S: thermal images analysis software. Mom 1 -- 10-min warm-up (100W); - Test- 100W+ 25W/min (80 to 90rpm). Measurement: BT, after warm-up, intra and IAT AT: 10min; TR: 22-23º C, RHA: 50± 5%; Spectrum: 0.98, TS: NI; ES: NI. NI Base temperature was 32.50°C± 0.67. Post-exercise< skinT (30.87°C± 0.73). > skinT after release (3min) (32º C) and skinT after release (6min) reached 32.50º C.
Priego-Quesada et al., 2016a C: FLIR E-60; R: 320x 240; S: TRP FLIR. Mom 1 (PT) - 5-minute warm-up (50W)+ 25 W/min until exhaustion (90± 3rpm). Mom 2 (test) - 3-min warm-up at 50 W (90± 2 rpm)+ 45 min at 50% of maximal power (90± 2rpm). Measurement: BT, IAT and 10min ΔT of Cy.

  • AT: 10min; TR: 23.7± 1.4º C; RHA: 45.1± 12.0%

  • ES: 0.98, Ac: ± 2%.

Underwear

  • Previously, skinT was different among the three groups of ROIs.

  • Regarding skinT variation, the anterior thigh group showed greater increase.

Priego-Quesada et al., 2016b C: FLIR E-60; R: 320x 240; S: TRP FLIR. Mom 1 (PT) - 5-min warm-up at 50W+ load increase of 25W/min until exhaustion (90± 3rpm); Mom 2 (test): 3-min warm-up at 50W (90± 2 rpm), followed by 45min at 50% of maximal power (90± 2rpm). AT: 10min; TR: 23.4± 1.1 °C, 23.6± 1.2°C, 24.0± 1.2°C; RHA: 45.4± 12.5 %, 40.7± 11.3%, 50.8± 11.2%; TS: 0,05°C, Ac: ±2%. Underwear The knee flexion at 20° caused > skinT in the popliteal than at 40°. No differences in absolute temperatures among the three flexion angles in the other fifteen ROIs were found.
Priego-Quesada et al., 2016c C: FLIR E-60; R: 320x 240; S: TRP FLIR TRP FLIR. Mom 1 (PT) - 5-min warm-up (50W)+ 25W/min until exhaustion (90± 3 rpm). Mom 2 (test): 3-min warm-up (50W) (90± 2rpm)+ 45min at 35% and 50% of maximal power (90 ± 2 rpm). Measurement: BT, IAT and 10min after ending. AT: 15min; TR: 21.8± 0.7°C, 21.2± 0.8°C; RHA: 39.4± 4.5%, 39.0± 4.9%; TS: 0.05°C, ES: NI; Ac: ± 2%. Underwear There are no differences in the absolute values of skinT between workloads (35% or 50%) in any ROI. In addition, Cy workload presented no effect on skin temperature variation in most ROIs.
Tanda, 2016 C: FLIR T335; R: 320x 240. Mom 1 (progressive load): 6km/h+ 1.5Km/h, each 5min, until 13.5km/h. Mom 2 (constant load): 5min (6Km/h)+ 25min of Ru (12km/h), Measurement: each 5min. AT: 10min, TR: 22± 0.3º C; RHA: 60± 2%, TS: 0.05°C; ES: 0.98. T-shirt, shorts and sneakers Progressive load - < skinT. In constant exercise, < skinT reached a minimum value in the beginning, followed by an increase.
Chudecka et al., 2015 C: ThermaCAM SC500 camera; R: 320x 240; S: Agema Report. Mom 1 (Group 1): 30-min warm-up+ 2000m test (rowing). Mom 2 (Group 2): 90min of resistance training (real game). Measurement: 20min BT and IAT. AT: Group 1 - 30min; Group 2 - 20min TR: 25°C, RHA: 60%. Shorts and sneakers IAT, skinTs were smaller than the initial ones. Group 1 - there was no asymmetry in skinT. Group 2 - there was asymmetry both at the dominant and non-dominant sides.
Priego-Quesada et al., 2015b C: FLIR E-60; R: 320x 240; S: TRP FLIR. Mom 1 (PT): 5min (max) 400m track. Mom 2 (test): 10-min warm-up+ 20min (75% MAS)+ 3min at 60% and 1min at 5Km/h. Measurement: BT, IAT and 10min after it. AT: 10min, TR: 23.7± 0.8°C; RHA: 48.8± 10.9%, TS: 0.05°C; ES: NI, Ac: ± 2%. Undressed Wearing socks led to > skinT in the regions of the body that were in contact with the garment. It also led to > skinT in some regions of the body that were not in contact with the garment.
Priego-Quesada et al., 2015a C: FLIR E-60; R: 320x 240; S: TRP FLIR.

  • Mom 1 (test): 3-min warm-up at 50W (90rpm)+ 50% of maximal power at 90rpm± 3rpm.

  • Measurement: BT, IAT and 10min after it.

  • AT: 15 min, TR: 21.2± 0.8º C

  • RHA: 39.0± 4.9%, TS: < 0.05º C; ES: NI, Ac: ± 2%

Underwear There was no difference between the measurement methods (IRT and thermopar sensor) in the pre-test but some differences IAT and after cool-down.
James et al., 2014 C: FLIR e40BX; R: 160x 120; S: Flir tools. Mom 1 (test): 5min treadmill (8Km/h), followed by 5x 3 min (8 to 10Km/h) and increasing 1Km/h in each set. AT: 40min, TR: 31.9± 1º C; RHA: 61± 8.9%, Spectrum: 7.5-13μm, TS: < 0.045°C, ES: 0.98; Ac: ± 2%. NI The reliability of the telemetry was acceptable during stress tests, while the IRT displayed some errors due to the sweat rate as a result of exposure to heat during the test.
Abate et al., 2013 C: FLIR SC3000; QWIP; R: 320x 240; S: TRP FLIR 2.9. Mom 1 (test): 1st Step: 0-5 min at 100W (60rpm); 2nd Step: 5-10min at 130W (60rpm); 3rd Step: 10-15 min at 160W (60rpm). AT: 20 min, TR: 23 ± 1°C; RHA: 55± 10%, Spectrum: 8-9 μm, TS: 0.02K, Lens: 20º; ES: 0.98. Shorts and sneakers > skinT in untrained athletes than in trained athletes.
Bertucci et al., 2013 C: Cedip Titanium HD560M; R: 640× 512. Mom 1 (test): 4-min warm-up+ 4min (100W)+ 40W each 4min. Measurement BT, during and immediately after ending. Wavelength: 3.5 to 5 mm^ 0.25 mm. NI skinT at rest reached 31.41°C (before) and the same value afterwards. In individual 2, skinT reached 31.98°C (before) and + 0.9°C afterwards. During the test and 5 min after it, skinT reached the same temperature in individual 1 and it rose 0.9°C in individual 2 .
Smith and Havenith, 2011 C: Thermacam B2, FLIR; R: 160x 120

  • Mom 2 (Ru test):

  • 1h (1% incline), 30min

  • (55% O 2 max)+ 30min

  • (75% O 2 max).

  • Measurement: BT, before and after pad application and ΔT.

TR: 25.6± 0.4°C; RHA: 43.4± 7.6%. Shorts and t-shirt > Sweat rates in the central region (upper and middle) and lower back. < values (fingers, thumbs and palms). > sweat rates in the forehead compared to values in the chin and cheeks. > sweat rate in all regions (low and high intensity exercises) except for the feet and ankles.
Merla et al., 2010 C: FLIR SC3000 QWIP; R: 320x 240 Mom 1: 7x 2 min of TR, 10% of incline and speeds (3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15Km/h). AT: 20min; TR: 23 to 24º C, RHA: 50± 5%, Spectrum: 8-9μm NI After warm-up, < skinT, from stage 2 to 6, from 3º to 5°C and > skinT in recovery.

ROI: region of interest; C: camera; R: resolution; S: software; skinT: skin temperature; AT: acclimatization time; TR: temperature in the room; RHA: relative humidity of air; TS: temperature sensitivity; TR: treadmill running; W: watts; BT: before the test; IAT: immediately after the test; ΔT: time after the test; ES: emissivity of skin; Ac: Accuracy; PT: pre-test; Te: test; PoT: post-test; Ru: running; Cy: cycling; NI: not informed; Pos: position; Dist: distance; H: height; Mom: moment; IRT: infrared thermography; Thermacam Researcher Pro 2.10 software, FLIR: TRP FLIR.

Table 3. Methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. 

Studies Pre-intervention During intervention Post intervention Risk
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Perez-Guarner et al., 2019 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Priego-Quesada et al., 2019 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Tumilty et al., 2019 Low Serious Moderate Low Low Low Low Serious
Rodriguez-Sanz et al., 2019 Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
Priego-Quesada et al., 2017 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Balci et al., 2016 Moderate Serious Moderate Low Low Low Low Serious
Jensen et al., 2016 Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
Ludwig et al., 2016 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Priego-Quesada et al., 2016a Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Priego-Quesada et al., 2016b Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Priego-Quesada et al., 2016c Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Tanda, 2016 Low Low Moderate Low Low Low Low Moderate
Chudecka et al., 2015 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Priego-Quesada et al., 2015b Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Priego-Quesada et al., 2015a Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
James et al., 2014 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Abate et al., 2013 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Bertucci et al., 2013 Serious Low Serious Low Low Low Low Serious
Smith and Havenith, 2011 Serious Low Moderate Low Low Low Low Serious
Merla et al., 2010 Low Low Moderate Low Low Low Low Moderate

1) confusion; 2) selection of study participants; 3) assessment of intervention; 4) non-receipt of assigned intervention; 5) losses; 6) assessment of outcomes; 7) selective report of outcomes.

The main sources of bias in the present review were related to the pre-intervention and intervention phases. The lack of acclimatization of the volunteers before thermographic evaluations generated a confounding bias in sample results since the Tskin can be affected by movements prior to data collection, suggesting a moderate or severe risk in this domain (Rodriguez-Sanz et al., 2019; Balci, Basaran, & Colakoglu, 2016; Jensen et al., 2016; Bertucci et al., 2013; Smith & Havenith, 2011). Another bias observed in these studies was the sampling process, generating a selection bias, which was carried out for convenience (Tumilty, Adhia, Smoliga, & Gisselman, 2019; Balci et al., 2016). Some studies presented risks of bias during the intervention because they did not present information such as the position of the individuals, distance from the camera, the position of the camera, and characteristics of the equipment (Tumilty et al., 2019; Balci et al., 2016; Tanda, 2016; Smith & Havenith, 2011; Merla, Mattei, Di Donato, & Romani, 2010).

DISCUSSION

This systematic review identified 20 studies using IRT in endurance sports practice. It was organized by the patterns of Tskin assessment in endurance sports, such as ROI, equipment, protocols, and results.

The Tskin is influenced by the ambient temperature, and to avoid thermoregulatory effects, such as loss and gain of heat that can interfere in the IRT results, the ambient temperature must be between 18 and 25°C (Priego-Quesada, Salvador, & Cibrian, 2017). It can be seen that most of the included studies used this temperature range, with the exception of James, Richardson, Watt and Maxwell (2014), who used 31.9± 1°C. Other studies did not inform the temperature during the data collection (Jensen et al., 2016; Bertucci et al., 2013).

Another relevant element to observe is the relative humidity of the air since it influences the heat exchange between the body and the environment (Grinzato, 2010). There was no standardization since the relative humidity of the air presented in the studies varied from 19 to 69.9%. Two studies did not present it (Jensen et al., 2016; Bertucci et al., 2013). In humid environments, the effectiveness of heat loss decreases, and the humidity can condense in the body, resulting in heat gain that can alter the thermographic image captured (Johnson, 2010; Priego-Quesada et al., 2017).

In addition to the environmental variables, the acclimatization duration into the data collection room is also a considerable condition in IRT use (Marins et al., 2014). A great amplitude of acclimatization was found, varying from 10 minutes (eight studies) to 40 minutes (one work). Five studies did not report the use of acclimatization (Rodriguez-Sanz et al., 2019; Balci et al., 2016; Jensen et al., 2016; Bertucci et al., 2013; Smith & Havenith, 2011). However, there was a non-standardization about the clothing of subjects, where 6 studies standardized underwear (articles 1, 9, 10, 11, 14, and 15 according to Table 1), 1 using only shorts (5), 2 with shorts and sneakers (13 and 17), 1 with shorts and T-shirt (19), 1 with shorts, sneakers and socks (6), 1 with T-shirt, shorts and sneakers (12) and 8 studies did not inform the used clothing during the tests (articles 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 16, 18, 20). These results reflected the importance of a standardization presented by Moreira et al. (2017) in the TISEM checklist. Since the type of clothing and acclimatization period influences the Tskin and affects the evaluated ROIs.

In general, there was an increase in Tskin after exercise (16 studies). However, one study observed a decrease in Tskin throughout the test (Balci et al., 2016). Priego-Quesada et al. (2016c) did not observe any variation in Tskin for the workload used. Tanda (2016) found that the individual’s average Tskin decreases continuously during the progressive load exercise, whereas Chudecka, Lubkowska, Leznicka and Krupecki (2015), while measuring immediately after exercise, observed that the average Tskins were lower than the initial ones.

These results may be influenced by the lack of standardization of the period of the data collection. Ten studies (articles 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 14, 16, 17, 19, and 20, according to Table 1) collected the infrared images always at the same time, respecting the subjects’ circadian cycle. Only 1 study (9) reported that the data collections were carried out at different times, presenting it as a limitation of the research, and the other studies (4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18) did not control or did not report the data collection time. This fact could represent some bias since there is a correlation between the individual’s circadian cycle with skin temperature (Moreira et al., 2017).

Most of the studies noticed a decrease in Tskin in the initial moments of physical activity that occurs due to the directing of blood flow to the active muscle generated by cutaneous vasoconstriction. This same behavior was described by Neves et al. (2015a) in their systematic review about the thermal response in different types of exercise. These authors reported that the decrease in Tskin during initial moments of physical activity was verified in different parts of the body. This behavior is due to skin blood adjustments that promote vasoconstriction of the blood vessels in inactive regions, offering greater blood flow to the muscular region under stimulation (Neves et al., 2015a). The performed tests in this systematic review ranged from a maximum test with incremental load to exhaustion (articles 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 18 according to Table 1) and tests with controlled load (2, 4, 7, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19 and 20) that reflects the greater vascularization at the active muscles.

After this initial decrease in Tskin, there is no standardized reaction. Several factors were pointed as responsible for the Tskin behavior in the subsequent minutes, but the duration and intensity of exercise were the main ones. These findings are in line with those reported by (Neves et al., 2015b).

The IRT has been consolidated as an excellent tool for evaluating Tskin and body thermoregulatory responses during exercise, however, caution is needed. The sensitivity of the skin to external agents such as ambient temperature, relative humidity, activities performed before data collection, and procedures during the evaluation can significantly affect the data collected.

It also must be pointed that the resolution of the cameras influences the results. Nonetheless, only 2 (articles 16 and 19) used equipment with resolution lower than 320x 240 pixels, besides, 7 studies (articles 1, 2, 6, 9, 12, 16, and 17) reported camera 0.98 emissivity and one study (3) reported 0.95 emissivity, below the value predicted at TISEM checklist.

The limitations of this review are related to IRT and the difficulty of controlling the factors that affect the thermal responses of these studies. The risks of bias related to selecting the samples and the lack of blinding evaluators in the outcome indicate that these results must be analyzed with caution.

CONCLUSION

Based on the presented studies, it could be concluded that the thermal assessment protocols for endurance sports respected the acclimatization time in 75% of the selected studies and that the thermal image collections were performed, predominantly, in three moments: before the test, immediately after the test and 10 minutes after the test. The used ROIs were mostly selected in responses of a specific muscle recruited in each modality, emphasizing lower limbs muscles.

Regarding the equipment used, FLIR cameras were used in 70% of the studies, with a minimum resolution of 320x 240 pixels. This aspect is very relevant since the results will always be associated with the software, quality, and technology of equipment, paying attention to the resolution (pixels), accuracy, and, mainly, to the data collection procedures (distance, camera angle, controlled stability, acclimatization, ambient temperature, and relative humidity.

Mostly, the Tskin behavior in endurance sports decreased in the initial moments of physical exercise and increased after exercise. After this initial decrease in temperature, the thermal response is mainly dependent on the duration and intensity of exercise. At constant speed exercise, the Tskin increased after a few minutes of the beginning.

However, there are still many questions about the effectiveness and precision of field assessments about thermal responses in endurance sports during exercise, which can be explored in future researches.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Supported by Pró-Pesquisa CADESM/DECEx/Brazilian Army, EsEFEx and CCFEx.

REFERENCES

Abate, M., Di Carlo, L., Di Donato, L., Romani, G. L., & Merla, A. (2013). Comparison of cutaneous termic response to a standardised warm up in trained and untrained individuals. Journal of Sports Medicine And Physical Fitness, 26(53), 18-37. [ Links ]

Akimov, E. B., & Son’kin, V. D. (2011). Skin temperature and lactate threshold during muscle work in athletes. Human Physiology, 37(5), 621-628. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119711050033 [ Links ]

Ammer, K., & Formenti, D. (2016). Editorial: Does the type of skin temperature distribution matter? Thermology International, 26(2), 51-54. [ Links ]

Arellano, C. J., & Kram, R. (2014). Partitioning the metabolic cost of human running: A task-by-task approach. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 54(6), 1084-1098. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icu033 [ Links ]

Arfaoui, A., Polidori, G., Taiar, R., & Pop, C. (2012). Infrared Thermography in Sports Activity. Infrared Thermography, 141-168. https://doi.org/10.5772/30268 [ Links ]

Balci, G. A., Basaran, T., & Colakoglu, M. (2016). Analysing visual pattern of skin temperature during submaximal and maximal exercises. Infrared Physics and Technology, 74, 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2015.12.002 [ Links ]

Bertucci, W., Arfaoui, A., Janson, L., & Polidori, G. (2013). Relationship between the gross efficiency and muscular skin temperature of lower limb in cycling: a preliminary study. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 16(Suppl 1), 114-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2013.815902 [ Links ]

Chudecka, M., & Lubkowska, A. (2010). Temperature changes of selected body’s surfaces of handball players in the course of training estimated by thermovision, and the study of the impact of physiological and morphological factors on the skin temperature. Journal of Thermal Biology, 35(8), 379-385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2010.08.001 [ Links ]

Chudecka, M., Lubkowska, A., Leznicka, K., & Krupecki, K. (2015). The Use of Thermal Imaging in the Evaluation of the Symmetry of Muscle Activity in Various Types of Exercises (Symmetrical and Asymmetrical). Journal of Human Kinetics, 49(1), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0116 [ Links ]

Mara, L. S., Carvalho, T., Lineburger, A. A., Goldfeder, R., ... Brochi, L. (2013). Muscle Damage and Immunological Profile in the Ironman Brazil Triathlon. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Esporte, 19(4), 236-240. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-86922013000400002 [ Links ]

Fernandes, A. A, Santos Amorim, P. R., Prímola-Gomes, T. N., Sillero-Quintana, M., Fernández-Cuevas, I., … Marins, J. C. B. (2012). Avaliação da temperatura da pele durante o exercício através da termografia infravermelha: uma revisão sistemática. Revista A n d a l u z a d e Medicina Del Deporte, 5(3), 113-117. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=323327671005Links ]

Fernandes, A. A., Amorim, P. R., Brito, C. J., Moura, A. G., Moreira, D. G., … Marins, J. C. B. (2014). Measuring skin temperature before, during and after exercise: A comparison of thermocouples and infrared thermography. Physiological Measurement, 35(2), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/35/2/189 [ Links ]

Fernández-Cuevas, I., Bouzas Marins, J. C., Arnáiz Lastras, J., Gómez Carmona, P. M., Piñonosa Cano, S., … Sillero-Quintana, M. (2015). Classification of factors influencing the use of infrared thermography in humans: A review. Infrared Physics and Technology, 71, 28-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2015.02.007 [ Links ]

Grinzato, E. (2010). Humidity and air temperature measurement by quantitative infrared thermography. Quantitative InfraRed Thermography Journal, 7(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.3166/qirt.7.55-72 [ Links ]

Hermand, E., Chabert, C., & Hue, O. (2019). Ultra-endurance events in tropical environments and countermeasures to optimize performances and health. International Journal of Hyperthermia : The Official Journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group, 36(1), 753-760. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2019.1635718 [ Links ]

James, C. A., Richardson, A. J., Watt, P. W., & Maxwell, N. S. (2014). Reliability and validity of skin temperature measurement by telemetry thermistors and a thermal camera during exercise in the heat. Journal of Thermal Biology, 45, 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.08.010 [ Links ]

Jensen, M. M., Poulsen, M. K., Alldieck, T., Larsen, R. G., Gade, R., … Franch, J. (2016). Estimation of Energy Expenditure during Treadmill Exercise via Thermal Imaging. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48(12), 2571-2579. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001013 [ Links ]

Jimenez-Pavon, D., Corral-Perez, J., Sanchez-Infantes, D., Villarroya, F., Ruiz, J. R., & Martinez-Tellez, B. (2019). Infrared Thermography for Estimating Supraclavicular Skin Temperature and BAT Activity in Humans: A Systematic Review. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 27(12), 1932-1949. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22635 [ Links ]

Johnson, J. M. (2010). Exercise in a hot environment: the skin circulation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 20(Suppl 3), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01206.x [ Links ]

Ludwig, N., Trecroci, A., Gargano, M., Formenti, D., Bosio, A., ... Alberti, G. (2016). Thermography for skin temperature evaluation during dynamic exercise: a case study on an incremental maximal test in elite male cyclists. Applied Optics, 55(34), D126-D130. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.55.00D126 [ Links ]

Marins, J., Gomes Moreira, D., Cano, S., Quintana, M., Dias Soares, D., … Amorim, P. (2014). Time required to stabilize thermographic images at rest. Infrared Physics & Technology, 65, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2014.02.008 [ Links ]

Merla, A., Mattei, P. A., Di Donato, L., & Romani, G. L. (2010). Thermal imaging of cutaneous temperature modifications in runners during graded exercise. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 38(1), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9809-8 [ Links ]

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2015). Principais itens para relatar Revisões sistemáticas e Meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 24(2), 335-342. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200017 [ Links ]

Moola, S., Munn, Z., Sears, K., Sfetcu, R., Currie, M., … Mu, P. (2015). Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute’s approach. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000064 [ Links ]

Moreira, D. G., Costello, J. T., Brito, C. J., Adamczyk, J. G., Ammer, K., … Sillero-Quintana, M. (2017). Thermographic imaging in sports and exercise medicine: A Delphi study and consensus statement on the measurement of human skin temperature. Journal of Thermal Biology, 69(5189), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.07.006 [ Links ]

Neves, E. B., Vilaca-Alves, J., Antunes, N., Felisberto, I. M. V., Rosa, C., & Reis, V. M. (2015a). Different responses of the skin temperature to physical exercise: Systematic review. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS, 37, 1307-1310. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318608 [ Links ]

Neves, E. B., Moreira, T. R., Lemos, R., Vilaça-Alves, J., Rosa, C., & Reis, V. M. (2015b). Using skin temperature and muscle thickness to assess muscle response to strength training. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Esporte, 21(5), 350-354. https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-869220152105151293 [ Links ]

Nybo, L. (2010). Cycling in the heat: performance perspectives and cerebral challenges. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 20(Suppl 3), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01211.x [ Links ]

Pérez-Guarner, A., Priego-Quesada, J. I., Oficial-Casado, F., Anda, R. M. C. O., Carpes, F. P., & Palmer, R. S. (2019). Association between physiological stress and skin temperature response after a half marathon. Physiological Measurement, 40(3), 034009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ab0fdc [ Links ]

Priego Quesada, J. I., Carpes, F. P., Palmer, R. S., Pérez-Soriano, P., & Anda, R. M. C. O. (2016b). Effect of saddle height on skin temperature measured in different days of cycling. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1843-z [ Links ]

Priego Quesada, J. I., Guillamón, N. M., Anda, R. M. C. O., Psikuta, A., Annaheim, S., ... & Palmer, R. S. (2015a). Effect of perspiration on skin temperature measurements by infrared thermography and contact thermometry during aerobic cycling. Infrared Physics & Technology, 72, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2015.07.008 [ Links ]

Priego Quesada, J., Lucas-Cuevas, A. G., Gil-Calvo, M., Giménez, J. V., Aparicio, I., ... & Pérez-Soriano, P. (2015b). Effects of graduated compression stockings on skin temperature after running. Journal of thermal biology, 52, 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2015.06.005 [ Links ]

Priego Quesada, J. I., Lucas-Cuevas, A. G., Palmer, R. S., Pérez-Soriano, P., & Anda, R. M. C. O. (2016a). Definition of the thermographic regions of interest in cycling by using a factor analysis. Infrared Physics & Technology, 75, 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2016.01.014 [ Links ]

Priego-Quesada, J. I., Martínez, N., Salvador Palmer, R., Psikuta, A., Annaheim, S., … Pérez-Soriano, P. (2016c). Effects of the cycling workload on core and local skin temperatures. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 77, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.04.008 [ Links ]

Priego-Quesada, J. I., Oficial-Casado, F., Gandia-Soriano, A., & Carpes, F. P. (2019). A preliminary investigation about the observation of regional skin temperatures following cumulative training loads in triathletes during training camp. Journal of Thermal Biology, 84, 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.07.035 [ Links ]

Priego-Quesada, J. I., Salvador, R., & Cibrian, R. (2017). Physics Principles of the Infrared Thermography and Human Thermoregulation, 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47410-6_2 [ Links ]

Raymann, R. J. E. M., Swaab, D. F., & Van Someren, E. J. W. (2008). Skin deep: Enhanced sleep depth by cutaneous temperature manipulation. Brain, 131(2), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm315 [ Links ]

Rodriguez-Sanz, D., Elena Losa-Iglesias, M., Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, R., Abdelhalim Dorgham, H. A., Benito-de-Pedro, M., … Calvo-Lobo, C. (2019). Thermography related to electromyography in runners with functional equinus condition after running. Physical Therapy in Sport, 40, 193-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.09.007 [ Links ]

Smith, C. J., & Havenith, G. (2011). Body mapping of sweating patterns in male athletes in mild exercise-induced hyperthermia. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(7), 1391-1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1744-8 [ Links ]

Sterne, J. A., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., … Higgins, J. P. (2016). ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Online), 355, 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 [ Links ]

Swinnen, W., Kipp, S., & Kram, R. (2018). Comparison of running and cycling economy in runners, cyclists, and triathletes. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 118(7), 1331-1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3865-4 [ Links ]

Tanda, G. (2016). Skin temperature measurements by infrared thermography during running exercise. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 71, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.10.006 [ Links ]

Tumilty, S., Adhia, D. B., Smoliga, J. M., & Gisselman, A. S. (2019). Thermal profiles over the Achilles tendon in a cohort of non-injured collegiate athletes over the course of a cross country season. Physical Therapy in Sport, 36, 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.01.009 [ Links ]

Funding: nothing to declare.

Received: October 05, 2020; Accepted: January 30, 2021

*Corresponding author: Av. Sete de Setembro, 3165, Rebouças - CEP: 80230-901 - Curitiba (PR), Brazil. E-mail: borbaneves@hotmail.com

Conflict of interest: nothing to declare.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License