SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número1Análise dos índices de adiposidade e de aptidão física em crianças pré-púberesResposta hemodinâmica aguda a uma sessão de exercício físico multicomponente em idosos índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto

versão impressa ISSN 1645-0523

Rev. Port. Cien. Desp. v.8 n.1 Porto abr. 2008

 

Análise comparativa do pico de consumo de oxigênio entre nadadoras e não nadadoras

 

Emilson Colantonio1

Ronaldo V. Barros

Maria Augusta Kiss2

 

1Centro de Estudos em Psicobiologia e Exercício (CEPE), Associação Fundo de Incentivo a Psicofarmacologia (AFIP)

2Laboratório de Determinantes Energéticos de Desempenho Esportivo (LaDESP)

Escola de Educação Física e Esporte, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil

 

 

RESUMO

Os objetivos do presente estudo foram: a) Comparar a variação dos valores do VO2pico entre diferentes grupos etários de meninas; b) Comparar a variação dos valores do VO2pico (absoluto e relativo), entre nadadoras (Nad) e não nadadoras (NNad) para os mesmos agrupamentos de idade. Foram avaliadas 74 meninas entre 7-17 anos de idade (34Nad e 40NNad), distribuídas em grupos etários de 7-10, 11-14 e 15-17 anos, formando 06 subgrupos, respectivamente: Nad1 (n=13); Nad2 (n=12); Nad3 (n=09); NNad1 (n=12); NNad2 (n=14); NNad3 (n=14). Para a obtenção dos valores de VO2pico foi utilizado o sistema de análise de gases VO2000® e uma esteira rolante Inbrasport ATL®, adotando o protocolo de Bruce adaptado. Os resultados indicaram que houve um aumento do VO2pico absoluto entre todos os grupos etários tanto para NNad quanto para Nad, o que não foi observado nos valores de VO2pico relativo, sendo que as Nad sempre apresentaram valores superiores às NNad. Tal fato sugere que esse comportamento seja resultado do desenvolvimento natural das avaliadas além do efeito do treinamento de natação, e ainda, que o VO2pico relativo pode não ser um indicador interessante para avaliar a aptidão aeróbia de crianças e jovens.

 Palavras-chave: valores metabólicos, crianças e jovens, atletas e não atletas

 

 

ABSTRACT

Comparative analysis between female swimmers and non-swimmers in peak oxygen uptake

The main purpose of the present study was: a) to compare the variation values VO2peak variation between different female age-groups; b) to compare VO2peak values (absolute and relative), between female swimmers (Sw) and non-swimmers (NSw) for the same age-group. The sample was composed by seventy four female volunteers, ranging in age from 7 to 17 years (34Sw e 40NSw), and grouped in different ages: 7-10; 11-14; and 15-17 years, making six under groups: three groups composed entirely by female swimmers (Sw1, n=13; Sw2, n=12; Sw3, n=09), and three groups composed by non swimmers (NSw1, n=12; NSw2, n=14; NSw3, n=14), respectively. The VO2peak values were attained by the VO2000® gas analysis system and Inbrasport ATL® treadmill, using adapted Bruce protocol. The results pointed out an increment on absolute VO2peak values among the all age-groups considering NSw and Sw groups. The same was not observed for relative VO2peak values. The Sw always presented higher values in comparison with NSw. These findings suggest that this behavior is a result of natural development of the subjects’ more than swimming training. The results also suggest, that relative VO2peak can not to be considered a very pertinent to evaluate the aerobic fitness of children and adolescents.

 Key-words: metabolic values, children and adolescents, athletes and non-athletes

 

 

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text only available in PDF format.

 

 

REFERÊNCIAS

1.  Bailey DA, Mirwald RL (1988). The effects of training on growth and development of child. In: Malina RM (ed.), Young Athletes: biological, psychological, and Educational Perspectives. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers, 33-47.         [ Links ]

2.  Bar-Or O (1985). Some notes on physiological and medical considerations for exercises and training of children. In: Binkhordt RA, Kemper HCG, Saris WHM (eds.), Children and Exercise XI. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers, 346-53.

3.  Colantonio E, Kiss MAPDM (1996). Tópicos de limiar anaeróbio metabólico. Revista Âmbito de Medicina Desportiva, 10: 16-28.

4.  Kemper HCG (1995). The Amsterdam growth study: a longitudinal analysis of health, fitness and lifestyle. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.

5.  Matveyev LP (1996). Preparação desportiva. Londrina: Centro de Informações Desportivas.

6.  Rowland TW (1996). Developmental Exercise Physiology. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.

7.  Bailey DA, Malina RM, Mirwald RL (1986). The child, physical activity and growth. In: Falkner F, Tanner JM (eds.), Human Growth: Vol. 2 Postnatal growth, neurology. New York: Plenum, 147-70.

8.  Bailey DA, Malina RM, Rasmussen RL (1978). The influence of exercise, physical activity, and athletic performance on the dynamics of human growth. In: Falkner F, Tanner JM (eds.), Human Growth: Vol. 2 Postnatal growth, neurology.New York:: Plenum, 475-505.

9.  Malina RM (1983). Human growth, maturation, and regular physical activity. Acta Medica Auxologica, 15: 05-27.

10.Del Nero E, Yazbeck-Jr P, Kedo HH, Kiss MAPDM, Juliano Y, Moffan PJ (1985). Ação do metoprolol duriles na insuficiência coronária crônica. Arquivo Brasileiro de Cardiologia, 45 (03): 211.

11.Negrão CE, Pereira Barreto AC (1998). Efeito do treinamento físico na insuficiência cardíaca: implicações anatômicas, hemodinâmicas e metabólicas. Revista da Sociedade de Cardiologia do Estado de São Paulo, 8(2): 273-84.

12.Bar-Or O (1996). The child and adolescent athlete.Oxford: Blackwell Science.

13.Malina RM, Bouchard C (2002). Atividade Física do Atleta Jovem: do Crescimento à Maturação.São Paulo: Editora Roca.

14.Unnithan VB, Timmons JA, Brogan RT, Paton JY, Rowland TW (1996). Submaximal running economy in run-trained pre-pubertal boys. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 36(1): 16-23.

15.Dal Monte A, Faina M (1999). Valutazione dell’atleta. Turim: Unione Tipogrrafico-Editrice Torinense.

16.Billat V, Pinoteau J, Petit B (1995). Exercise induced hypoxemia and time to exhaustion at 90, 100 and 105% of the maximal aerobic speed in long distance elite runners. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 20: 102-11.

17.Lavoie NF, Mercer TH (1987). Incremental and constant load determinations of VO2max and maximal constant load. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 12: 229-32.

18.Robergs RA, Roberts SO (1997). Exercise Physiology – Exercise, Performance, and Clinical Applications. Boston: WCB McGraw-Hill.

19.Saltin P, Astrand PO (1967). Maximal oxygen uptake in athletes. Journal of Applied Physiology, 23 (03): 353-8.

20.Eriksson BO, Holmer I, Lundin A (1978). Physiological effects of training in elite swimmers. In: Eriksson BO, Furberg B (eds.), Swimming Medicine IV. Baltimore: University Park Press, 177-87.

21.MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ (1991). Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.

22.Wilmore JH, Costill DL (1994). Physiology of Sport and Exercise. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.

23.Troup JP, Trappe TA (1994). Applications of research in swimming. In: Miyashita M, Mutoh Y, Richardson AB (eds.), Medicine and Science in Aquatic Sports, Basel: Karger, 39: 155-65.

24.Gastin PB (2001). Energy system interaction and relative contribution during exercise. Sports Medicine, 31(10): 725-41.

25.Mirwald RL, Bailey DA (1986). Maximal aerobic power. London: Sports Dynamics.

26.Andersen KL, Seliger V, Rutenfranz J, Skrobak-Kaczynski J (1976). Physical performance capacity of children in Norway. Part IV – The rate of growth in maximal aerobic power and the influence of improved physical education of children in a rural community. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 35: 49-58.

27.Armstrong N, Williams J, Balding J, Gentle P, Kirby B (1991). The peak oxygen uptake of British children with reference to age, sex and sexual maturity. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 62 (5): 369-75.

28.Nakagawa A, Ishiko T (1970). Assessment of aerobic capacity with special reference to sex and age of junior and senior high school students in Japan. Japanese Journal of Physiology, 20: 118-29.

29.Armstrong N, Balding J, Gentle P, Kirby B (1990). Patterns of physical activity among 11 to 16 years old British children. British Medical Journal, 301: 203-5.

30.Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Hosmer D (1973). Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional impairment in cardiovascular disease. American Heart Journal, 85: 546-2.

31.Armstrong N, Welsman JR (1994). Assessment and interpretation of aerobic fitness in children and adolescents. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 22: 435-76.

32.Beunen G, Baxter-jones ADG, Mirwald RL, Thomis M, Lefevre J, Malina RM, Bailey DA (2002). Intraindividual allometric development of aerobic power in 8- to 16-year-old boys. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34 (03): 503-10.

33.Armstrong N, Welsman JR (2001). Peak oxygen uptake in relation to growth and maturation in 11- to 17-year-old humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 85 (06): 546-51.

34.Eisenmann JC, Pivarnik JM, Malina RM (2001). Scaling peak VO2 to body mass in young male and female distance runners. Journal of Applied Physiology, 90(6): 2172-80.

35.Matecki S, Prioux J, Amsallen F, Mercier J, Prefault C, Ramonatxo M (2001). Maximal oxygen uptake in healthy children: factors of variation and variation standards. Revue des Maladis Respiratories, 18(4): 499-506.

36.Thomis M, Rogers DM, Beunen GP, Woynarowska B, Malina RM (2000). Allometric relationship between body size and peak VO2 related to age at menarche. Annals of Human Biology, 27(6): 623-33.

37.Welsman JR, Armstrong N, Nevill AM, Winter EM, Kirby BJ (1996). Scaling peak VO2 for differences in body size. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 28(2): 259-65.

 

 

CORRESPONDÊNCIA

Emilson Colantonio

Rua Marcelo Ribeiro de Mendonça, 27, ap.22, CEP – 11030-210

Ponta da Praia, Santos, SP - Brasil

e-mail: nunoec@uol.com.br