SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número1Competência física percebida de crianças com paralisia cerebral: Que relações com a percepção dos seus pais e a sua função motora?Prontitud coordinativa: perfiles multivariados en función de la edad, sexo y estatus socio-económico índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto

versão impressa ISSN 1645-0523

Rev. Port. Cien. Desp. v.8 n.1 Porto abr. 2008

 

Estrutura interna da versão portuguesa do Sport Commitment Questionnaire (SCQ) e Funcionamento Diferencial dos Itens (DIF) com a versão espanhola

 

Catarina Sousa1

Carme Viladrich1

Maria João Gouveia2

Miquel Torregrosa1

Jaume Cruz1

 

1Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Espanha

2Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal

 

 

RESUMO

O compromisso desportivo como construto que explica a continuidade da prática desportiva e o seu modelo teórico que hipotetiza os factores que precedem  essa continuidade, apresentam-se como elementos bastante relevantes como forma de evitar o abandono desportivo. A análise da estrutura interna da versão Portuguesa do Sport Commitment Questionnaire (SCQ - questionário de compromisso desportivo) e comparação transcultural com a versão Espanhola, foram os principais objectivos do presente estudo. Participaram um total de 1702 jogadores de futebol, dos quais 850 Portugueses, entre os 11 e os 19 anos, e 852 da Catalunha, entre os 14 e 16 anos. Os resultados apoiam, em parte, a estrutura da versão portuguesa do SCQ com 6 factores e 28 itens. Destes factores, quatro - compromisso desportivo, divertimento desportivo, alternativas à implicação e coacções sociais - apresentam consistência interna suficiente. A análise do Funcionamento Diferencial dos Itens revela equivalência estrutural entre o modelo da versão Portuguesa e o modelo da versão Espanhola. A versão Portuguesa e Espanhola são mais próximas entre si, quando comparadas com os resultados da versão original. São necessários estudos que incluam diferentes desportos, idades e níveis competitivos para comprovar as características psicométricas da versão Portuguesa do SCQ.

Palavras-chave: compromisso desportivo, adaptação do Sport Commitment Questionnaire (SCQ) ao Português, funcionamento diferencial dos itens (DIF).

 

 

ABSTRACT

 Portuguese version internal consistency of the Sport Commitment Questionnaire (SCQ) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF)with the Spanish version

 The sport commitment as a construct that explain the continuity of sport practice and its theoretical model, that suggest which factors predicts this continuity, are relevant elements to avoid sport dropouts. The main goals of this study were the analysis of the internal consistency Portuguese version of the Sport Commitment Questionnaire (SCQ) and cross-cultural comparison with the Spanish version of the same instrument. Participants were1702 soccer players, 850 from Portugal, ranged from 11 to 19 years of age, and 852 from Catalonia, ranged from 14 to 16 years of age. Results provided some support for the SCQ Portuguese version with 6 factors and 28 items. Reliability analysis provided acceptable internal consistency for four scales: sport commitment, sport enjoyment, involvement alternatives and social constraints. The Differential Item Functioning (DIF) showed that the Portuguese structural model is equivalent to the Spanish structural model. The Portuguese and Spanish versions were more similar than when comparing with original version. Further studies with a wider age range, different genders, and other sports or competitive levels are necessary to confirm psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the SCQ.

Key-Words: Portuguese adaptation of the Sport Commitment Questionnaire (SCQ), differential item functioning (DIF), sport commitment

 

 

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text only available in PDF format.

 

 

REFERÊNCIAS

1.  Alexandris K., Zahariadis P, Tsorbatzoudis C, Grouios G (2002). Testing the Sport Commitment model in the context of exercise and fitness participation. Journal of Sport Behavior, 25(3): 217-230.        [ Links ]

2.  Arbuckle JL (2003). Amos 5.0 update to the amos user’s guide. Chicago: SmallWaters.

3.  Barber BL, Eccles JS, Stone MR (2001). Whatever happened to the jock, the brain and the princess? Young adult pathways linked to adolescent activity involvement and social identity. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16: 429-455.

4.  Bois JE, Sarrazin PG,  Brustad RJ, Trouilloud DO, Curry F (2005). Elementary schoolchildren perceived competence and physical activity involvement: the influence of parents’ role modelling behaviours and perceptions of their child’s competence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6: 381-397.

5.  Boixadós M, Cruz J, Torregrosa M, & Valiente, L. (2004). Relationships among motivational climate, satisfaction, perceived ability, and fair play attitudes in young soccer players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16(4): 301-317.

6.  Boixadós M, Valiente L, Mimbrero J, Torregrosa M, Cruz J (1998). Papel de los agentes de socialización en deportistas en edad escolar. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 14: 295-310.

7.  Brustad RJ, Babkes ML, Smith AL (2001). Youth in sport: psychological considerations. En R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas & C. M. Janelle (Eds.). Handbook of sport psychology (2nd Ed. pp. 604-635). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

8.  Carpenter PJ, Coleman R (1998). A longitudinal study of elite youth cricketers’ commitment. Journal of Sport Psychology, 29: 195-210.

9.  Cronbach LJ (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16: 297-334.

10.Cruz J (2001). Factores motivacionales en el deporte infantil y asesoramiento psicológico a entrenadores y padres. En. J. Cruz (Ed.), Psicología del Deporte (pp. 245-268). Primeira Reimpressão. Madrid: Síntesis.

11.Cruz J, Boixadós M, Torregrosa M, Mimbrero J (1996). ¿Existe un deporte educativo?: Papel de las competiciones deportivas en el proceso de socialización del niño. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 9/10: 103-109.

12.Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Strycker LA, Chaumeton NR (2002). Relations between youth antisocial and prosocial activities. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25(5): 425-438.

13.Dunn AL, Trivedi MH, O’Neal HA (2001). Physical activity dose-response effects on outcomes of depression and anxiety. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33: S587-S597.

14.Gómez J (1996). Aportaciones de los modelos de estructuras de covariancia al análisis psicométrico. In J. Muñiz (coord..), Psicometría (pp. 457-554). Madrid: Universitas, S.A.

15.Horn TS (1985). Coaches’feedback and changes in children’s perceptions of their physical competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 6: 60-76.

16.Hu L, Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6: 1-55.

17.Jöreskog K G, Sörbom D (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

18.Lei M, Lomax RG (2005). The effect of varing degrees of non-normality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(1): 1-27.

19.McDonald RP, Ho RM-H (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1): 64-82.

20.Nunnally JC (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

21.Rusbult CE (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16: 172-186.

22.Ryska TA, Hohensee D, Cooley D, Jones C (2002). Participation motives in predicting sport dropout among Australian youth gymnasts. American Journal of Psychology, 4(2): 199-210.

23.Sallis JF, Patrick K (1996). Physical activity guidelines for adolescents: a consensus statement. Pediatric Exercise Science, 6:302-314.

24.Sallis JF, Simons-Morton BG, Stone EJ, Corbin CB, Epstein LH, Faucette N, Iannotti RJ, Killen JD, Klesgles RC, Petray CK, Rowland TW, Taylor W (1992). Determinants of physical activity and interventions in youth. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 24: S248-S257.

25.Scanlan TK, Carpenter PJ, Schmidt GW, Simons JP, Keeler B (1993). An Introduction to the Sport Commitment Model. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,15: 1-15.

26.Scanlan TK, Russell DG, Wilson NC, Scanlan LA (2003). Project on elite athlete commitment (PEAK):I. Introduction and Methodology. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25: 360-376.

27.Scanlan TK, Simons JP, Carpenter PJ, Schmidt GW, Keeler B. (1993). The Sport Commitment Model: Measurement development for the youth-sport domain. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15: 16-38.

28.Shields DL, Bredemeier BJ (1994). Character development and physical activity. Champaign, Il.: Human Kinetics.

29.Smoll FL, Smith RE (2006). Enhancing coach-athlete relationships: Cognitive-behavioral principles and procedures. En J. Dosil (Ed.). The Sport Psychologist’s Handbook (pp.19-37). London: John Wiley & Sons.

30.Sousa C, Torregrosa M, Viladrich C, Villamarín F, Cruz, J (2007). The commintment of young soccer players. Psicothema, 19: 256-262.

31.Sutter E, Hawes MR (1993). Relationship of physical activity, body fat, diet, and blood lipid profile in youths 10-15 yrs. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 25: 748-754.

32.Torregrosa M, Cruz J (2006). El deporte infantil como base de la carrera deportiva de adultos activos y deportistas de élite. En E.J. Garcés de los Fayos, A. Olmedilla  y P. Jara (Eds.). Psicología y Deporte (pp. 585-602). Murcia: Diego Marín.

33.Weiss MR (1991). Psychological skill development in children and adolescents. The Sport Psychologist, 5: 335-354.

34.Weiss MR, Kimmel LA, Smith AL (2001).Determinants of Sport Commitment among junior tennis players: Enjoyment as a mediating variables. Pediatric Exercise Science, 13:131-144.

 

 

AGRADECIMENTOS

Este trabalho foi realizado, em parte, devido ao Projecto I+D do Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (BSO2003-04301) e ao Projecto DEP2006-56013 do Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia

Agradecemos a colaboração na recolha de dados às alunas do ISPA, Elsa Macieira e Filipa Lisboa, ao bolseiro da UAB David Vilches e aos alunos da UAB Gabriela Cabello, Carlos Baeza, Azucena Arevalo e Santiago Ramis.

 

CORRESPONDÊNCIA

Catarina Sousa

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - Departament Psicologia Bàsica, Evolutiva i de l’Educació, Edifici B

08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona)

Tel: +34935812408

Fax: +34935813329

e-mail: catarina.dinis@uab.cat