SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue2Mediastinal Abscess: A Rare ComplicationMalnutrition Screening in Primary Health Care author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Medicina Interna

Print version ISSN 0872-671X

Medicina Interna vol.30 no.2 Lisboa June 2023  Epub July 01, 2027

https://doi.org/10.24950/rspmi.1966 

ARTIGOS DE REVISÃO/ REVIEW ARTICLES

Avaliação da Congestão Venosa por Ultrassonografia Point-of-Care: Estado da Arte

Evaluation of Venous Congestion by Point-of-Care Ultrasound: State of the Art

1Serviço de Urgência de Medicina Interna, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal

2Serviço de Medicina Interna, Hospital de Vila Franca de Xira, Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal

3Serviço de Medicina Interna, Hospital Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal

4Serviço de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitário La Paz, Madrid, Espanha

5Departamento de Medicina, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Alfonso X El Sabio, Madrid, Espanha

6IdiPAZ, Madrid, Espanha


Resumo

A avaliação da congestão venosa apresenta-se como um dos maiores desafios médicos da atualidade: desde técnicas mais invasivas até ao surgimento da avaliação ecográfica, a investigação tem sido constante, na expectativa de otimizar e melhorar a monitorização hemodinâmica dos doentes, através de exames à cabeceira do doente mais céleres e menos invasivos.

A hipertensão venosa é um importante mecanismo fisiopatológico na congestão venosa e consequente lesão de órgão, mas o seu diagnóstico é desafiante apenas pelo exame objetivo tradicional. Desta forma, a capacidade da ecografia point-of-care (POCUS) de caracterizar a anatomia e a fisiologia em tempo real, bem como de analisar fluxos dinâmicos, torna-a numa ferramenta importante e de maior sensibilidade no diagnóstico e monitorização da congestão venosa.

Neste artigo os autores fazem um breve resumo da fisiopatologia inerente, bem como da avaliação sistematizada da congestão venosa sistémica através de POCUS.

Palavras-chave: Hiperemia; Pressão Venosa Central; Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito; Ultrassonografia; Veias.

Abstract

The assessment of venous congestion is one of the greatest medical challenges of this century: from more invasive procedures to the arising of ultrasound evaluation, there has been a constant quest for reliable and non-invasive bedside tools to determine and monitor hemodynamic status.

Venous hypertension is an important pathophysiological mechanism of organ congestion, leading to its injury in various clinical settings. A practical bedside assessment of venous congestion is often challenging due to the limitations of traditional methods.

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) provides a real time picture of the patients' anatomy and physiology (including analysis of dynamic flows), allowing a diagnosis and monitoring of venous congestion with a higher sensitivity than standard physical examination.

In this brief summary, the authors summarize the physio-logy of venous congestion and the most recent tools for con-gestion assessment by POCUS.

Keywords: Central Venous Pressure; Hyperemia; Point-of-Care Systems; Ultrasonography; Veins.

Introduction

The assessment of venous congestion is one of the grea-test medical challenges of this century: from more invasive procedures to the arising of ultrasound evaluation, there has been a constant quest for reliable and non-invasive bedside tools to determine and monitor hemodynamic status,1 since it´s accuracy is vital for an appropriate clinical approach.2

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) provides a real time picture of the patients' anatomy and physiology (including analysis of dynamic flows), allowing the diagnosis of venous congestion and monitoring clinical evolution.

In recent years, excessive fluid administration has been shown to be associated with a higher incidence of acute kidney injury, increased morbidity, and mortality with multiorgan consequences.

In order to evaluate the systemic venous congestion, variations of hepatic, portal and interlobar renal venous wave-forms can be assessed to obtain useful information, using color Doppler (CD) and pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD).3

Venous hypertension is an important pathophysiological mechanism of organ congestion, leading to its injury in various clinical settings. A practical bedside assessment of venous congestion is often challenging due to the limitations of traditional methods.4

POCUS allows an increased sensitivity in congestion determination, compared to a standard physical examination.5

In this brief summary, the authors assembled some ultrasound tools that allow the evaluation of systemic venous congestion.

UNDERSTANDING VENOUS FLOW PHYSIOLOGY

Flow is the fluid volume transported over time, created by a pressure differential between two points in the circulatory system.3

Increased left-sided pressures facilitate lung congestion and lead to worsening of respiratory status.6 Moreover, the consequences of systemic venous congestion are also important on the right side, as increased right-sided filling pressures lead to higher right atrial pressure (RAP), that is transmitted backwards through the venous tree, causing congestion and consequent organ dysfunction.7

As systemic venous pressure increases, the perfusion pressure (RAP) to the tissues may be compromised, limiting flow through the capillaries, leading to variations in venous compliance.8

Progressive increases in venous volume, results in maximally stretched venous walls, reaching venous compliance curve´s plateau; at this point, the pressure transmission will slightly increase, causing congestion of peripheral organs. In this setting, evaluation of organ congestion can provide valuable information on the mechanism of organ dysfunction.9

Increased right side pressure leads to venous compliance variation (congestion) and its hemodynamic impact can be assessed through the altered venous return patterns during the cardiac cycle using POCUS, namely Doppler ultrasonography to determine flow velocities in veins.

At end-diastole, the right atrium (RA) depletes into a com-pliant right ventricle, regaining a low filling pressure. A low RAP leads to a maximum venous return; therefore, if RAP exceeds hepatic vein pressures there will be an interruption or a reversal of venous flow. In a healthy individual, the patterns of the hepatic veins´ flow directly reflect changes in the RAP, as opposed to what occurs in the distal venous system. The normal state of each organ is a continuous venous flow in systole and diastole, without undergoing variations. Conversely, venous compliance decreases with the increase of filling pressures in the venous system and in the right heart; simultaneously there is a higher transmission of RAP variations during the cardiac cycle.

This explains the pulsatility variations found in the Doppler flow of the portal, kidney´s interlobar and femoral veins.

ULTRASOUND EVALUATION OF VENOUS CONGESTION

Assessment of the inferior vena cava (IVC)

The first step to determine venous congestion is IVC´s evaluation, using a low-frequency (3.5-5 MHz) convex transducer (most common). After locating the vertebral body with the probe on a transverse epigastric plane, a 90º counterclockwise rotation enables the visualization of IVC´s long axis.10 The IVC must be measured on its longitudinal and transverse plane, 2 cm below the RA junction; it is considered abnormal above 2 cm.

Echographic measurements of the dynamic variations (collapsibility/distensibility) of the inferior vena cava, to assess the status of intravascular volemia, have many caveats and should not be used alone for this purpose.11,12However, a non-collapsible plethoric IVC correlates with the presence of venous congestion.

The evaluation of IVC using POCUS has been accepted for the evaluation of venous congestion, since it correlates with the pressure in the RA.11

The physiological principle underlying its use is the lung-heart interaction: the variation of transpulmonary pressure during breathing is transmitted to the right cavities of the heart, causing variations of the venous return and thus on the diameter of the IVC.

The IVC changes with intrathoracic pressure variation: during inspiration, the increase in negative intrathoracic pressure is transmitted to the vascular lumen, enhancing the venous return. The diameter and inspiratory collapsibility of the IVC are also related to the hemodynamics of the right ventricle. Therefore, in the presence of low pressures in the right heart cavities and/or hypovolemia (ascending phase of the Frank-Starling curve), the IVC compliance is elevated, collapsing significantly during inspiration.13

Assessment of the hepatic vein (HV)

The transducer (most commonly the convex transducer) must be placed at the subxiphoid level to obtain a crosssectional view. The color Doppler box should be placed (the vein should appear in blue) prior to assessing the PWD, immediately before the entry point of any of the three HV (right, middle and left) into the IVC (the right and middle HV are the most accessible). Previous to PWD evaluation, the color Doppler´s scale must be set with Nyquist limit at 30 cm/s.

Due to its proximity to the RA, the IVC is the first site affected by volume overload (preload) - it stops collapsing due to the increased pressure (diameter in adults exceeds 2 cm), affecting the three HV.

Under normal conditions, HV´s flow pattern is triphasic as it is related to the cardiac cycle (so it is important to have an electrocardiogram (EKG) synchronization, especially in the presence of arrhythmias).14There is an initial positive A wave (atrial contraction), followed by a negative S wave (RA relaxation during cardiac systole) and a negative D wave (ventricular relaxation during cardiac diastole).

The venous flow patterns that we can find are: S wave D wave (normal), S and D waves´ fusion or S wave < D wave (moderate congestion), S wave inversion (severe congestion).

Assessment of the portal vein (PV)

The coronal view (more accurate than subxiphoid view) is obtained with the convex transducer on the right midaxillary line, with the portal vein in the center. The color Doppler box must be placed at this level (the vein appears in red), followed by PWD evaluation just before the division into both portal branches (right and left). Once more, the color Doppler´s scale should be with Nyquist limit at 30 cm/s.

The normal portal venous flow pattern is monophasic with little respiratory variation.15 The portal vein is unique in its isolation from the arterial and venous systems (splanchnic capillaries and hepatic sinusoids, respectively). This explains the progression from minimally to significantly pulsatile flows without prolonged interruptions, in patients with rising pressures on the right cardiac side.16 As the congestion increases, a retrograde flow is generated with atrial contraction, which is transmitted to the hepatic sinusoids and the portal vein. This creates a pulsatility index, which increases concurrently to the congestion (Vmax. - Vmin. / Vmax.), allowing the classification into moderate (30%-49%) and severe (>50%) congestion.

PV pulsatility could be considered a sign of right heart dysfunction, being associated with poor outcomes in right heart failure patients17 and predicting response to diuresis at admission.18,19

Assessment of the renal vessels

The coronal view is obtained by placing the convex transducer on the posterior axillary line. To facilitate the examination, whenever possible, the patient should be laying in left lateral decubitus.

The color Doppler set at this level precedes the PWD acquisition within the renal parenchyma, at the interlobar vessels in the renal cortex (adjacent to medullary pyramids, as distal as possible). The color Doppler’s scale should be with Nyquist limit at 10 cm/s, appearing as a blue flow (it may help to widen this area). PWD flow will show both arterial (positive wave) and venous flow (negative wave).

Abnormal venous flow is mostly due to congestion (renosarca),20since it compromises renal resistivity (increased), mainly by promoting a poor distensibility of the renal capsule. The possible venous flow patterns are: continuous flow (normal), systolic-diastolic biphasic flow (moderate congestion), diastolic monophasic flow (severe congestion).21 These systolic (S) and diastolic (D) flows are related to the S and D waves of the previously mentioned hepatic flow. Arterial Doppler (positive wave) is used to delimit systole from diastole.22,23

The flow pattern of these veins is by far the most difficult to obtain. It may be tempting to measure the lobar or renal veins, since they are larger and easier to find, however, they show a poorer correlation with the real state of congestion. It may be helpful to ask the patient to hold an apnea, or to obtain flow patterns during expiration (since it is the longer respiratory phase, with less organ displacement).

Venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score

The VExUS score comprises four main components: IVC assessment, HV and intrarenal venous Doppler as an addition to PV Doppler, since the presence of a severe score showed greater specificity than PV pulsatility alone in predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery.24

The authors determined five phenotypes (VExUS A-E), divided into mild, moderate or severe congestion, based on different pattern combinations. As a result, they observed that the C score (Table 1) was related to the presence of AKI in both moderate and severe congestion.25

Table 1: Assessment of venous flows. 

To collect these variables, the patient should be placed in supine position, with the head at 0º (if possible), beginning with the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the IVC (as previously described): if its diameter is greater than 2 cm, the rest of the protocol should be performed; if it is less than 2 cm, in the absence of abdominal hypertension or ascites, the VExUS protocol cannot be proceeded, with the score being zero.26

The patterns of the hepatic, portal and renal veins are then analyzed and classified as normal, mildly or severely congested: grade 0 suggests the absence of congestion; grade 1 comprises any mild congestion pattern; grade 2 represents severe congestion in at least one organ; and grade 3 requires severe congestion patterns in at least 2 or 3 organs.24

Recently, there has been growing literature evidence supporting VExUS as a useful decision-making tool, identifying congestive patients and the underlying pathophysiology. On the other hand, these studies focused on a very specific cohort (post-cardiac surgery); nonetheless, the medical community tried to reproduce these results in other populations (acute heart failure, for example), with results that were not as great as expected,27 concluding that VExUS adds unnecessary complexity to the assessment and prognosis of patients with acute heart failure.28

Jugular venous ultrasound and right atrial depth (RAD)

A novel internal jugular vein (IJV) ultrasound technique to estimate RAP has been published.29 The RAP is calculated by combining the direct RAD measurement with IJV ultrasound30 at the supraclavicular point. Placing patients´ headboard at 45º, RAD is measured on the cardiac parasternal long-axis view (sectorial transducer). The vertical distance from the chest wall down to where the non-coronary cusp of the aortic valve attaches to the posterior wall of the left ventricular outflow tract was defined as RA depth, as it surrogates for the center of the RA. The ultrasound-estimated RAP (RAP-US) value can be calculated in two different ways depending on whether jugular vein distention (JVD) is present (distended IJV without respiratory variation); the point of venous collapse is identified by sliding the probe cranially (the right IJV is evaluated just superior to the clavicle with the linear probe in the transverse plane), subsequently confirmed by rotating the transducer 90º and visualizing the complete collapse of the venous walls in the longitudinal plane (“wine bottle sign”).31 The vertical distance from this point down to the sternum is measured using a ruler and added to the RAD in centimeters to estimate RAP. If IJV completely collapses with inspiration (absence of jugular distension), the headboard must be lowered to 30º. If it results in vein engorgement, RAP should be estimated using RAD x 0.75 cm H2O. However, if it does not engorge, it should be reassessed at 0 degrees: if IJV engorges, RAP is RAD x 0.5 cm H2O; on the contrary, RAP is estimated to be RAD x 0.25 cm H2O. RAP is converted to mmHg multiplying by 0.735.29 A measurement of RAD in addition to a jugular venous ultrasound exam can accurately estimate RAP.

Femoral vein pulsatility

In the absence of lower limbs venous system pathology, PWD evaluation of venous flow (at common femoral vein level) is an excellent tool to assess right ventricular overload and venous congestion.32,33

It is a fact that femoral venous flow reversal has been described concomitantly with right ventricle (RV) dysfunction, tricuspid regurgitation, venous insufficiency and obstruction.

The femoral vein, particularly the right femoral vein, is an extension of the IVC and reflects a window for estimating IVC and RA dynamics.34 PW-Doppler of the femoral vein, perfor-med with the patient in the supine position and with the linear probe, is easy and accessible, having a short learning curve.

The common femoral vein is identified 2-3 cm below the inguinal ligament, cranially to the entrance of the saphenous vein.32-34The Doppler scale should be ±20 cm/s for better visualization of the waves. Normal femoral vein Doppler (FVD) is defined as an antegrade mildly pulsatile uninterrupted pattern with respiratory variation and retrograde flow of less than 1/3 of antegrade flow.

There are three aspects to be considered pathological in the FVD: pulsatility, retrograde flow velocity > 10 cm/s and absence of respiratory variation.34

Pulsatile with or without reversal FVD patterns are considered suggestive of venous congestion. There are several pitfalls and limitations of FVD (Table 2).

Table 2 Venous flow patterns. 

This is a convenient method since it is not subject to the controversy surrounding IVC´s evaluation; furthermore, it has a simple anatomical accessibility and a short learning curve.34

The information above is summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

LIMITATIONS AND PITFALLS IN THE SYSTEMIC VENOUS CONGESTION ASSESSMENT

Common limitations to the acquisition of the techniques described are cardiac arrhythmias (it is necessary to perform an average pulsatility index on 3 to 5 beats), tricuspid regurgitation, chronic lung disease, or chronic increased intra-abdominal pressure. Another limitation is that this assessment is operator dependent, and, therefore, requires training.35

Starting with the IVC, the most relevant limitations and pitfalls occur in athletes who may have engorged IVC without elevated RAP; patients with elevated intra-abdominal pressure may have collapsed IVC despite elevated RAP.

Another inherent problem with IVC is the fact that the conventional long axis interrogation sight is controversial. Since the IVC is a three-dimensional structure with an elliptical shape, evaluation of the long and short axis diameters has been shown to be a better estimate of central venous pressure. The IVC with the abdominal aorta, remember that the latter has hyperechoic walls and pulsatility that coincides with cardiac pulsation. Caution with the HV confluence, which may overestimate the diameter of the IVC.36,37

In the HVs a main limitation is that it is possible to find an abnormal hepatic flow even with preserved RA´s distensibility. The value of HV Doppler is limited in the presence of significant tricuspid regurgitation as S wave reversal may be present without significant systemic venous congestion. A trial fibrillation leads to loss of A wave and smaller S wave (S<D) even in the absence of elevated RA pressure. EKG monitoring is important for the evaluation of hepatic venous flow.

One limitation of the evaluation of the PV flow is the presence of healthy thin patients,15arteriovenous malformations where it is possible to find an increase in pulsatility without the presence of congestion. Thus, it is also possible to find an absence of pulsatility in situations of liver cirrhosis, hepatic steatosis, or portal thrombosis, in which the transmission of pressure in the right atrium is attenuated at the level of the hepatic sinusoids.

The main limitations of acquisition of the renal vein pattern are severe chronic renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min) or patients on dialysis, in whom it is possible to find a monophasic venous flow, without the presence of parenchymal congestion.38

Ultrasound for systemic venous evaluation does not differentiate between RV pressure and volume overload. Therefore, the information should be used within the clinical context and integrated with other information. In patients with long-standing pulmonary hypertension with a high VExUS score, caution is necessary with decongestant measures, as cardiac output in these patients may depend on high preload. In some patients a good response to pulmonary vasodilators could be observed in the context of RV dysfunction, as evidenced by improvement in their VExUS score and renal functions.39

Another limitation of VExUS scoring is the reliability of technique and interpretation, as it requires proficiency with PW Doppler to perform accurately.

The limitations of the IJV estimate are among others: the difficulty of assessing the neck veins in individuals with short necks or obese; individuals with inappropriate long-axis cardiac ultrasound and the eventual need to lower the headboard to 0º in patients with respiratory distress.

Regarding the femoral vein, the most important limitations are found in the presence of deep vein thrombosis and pressure and respiratory distress. Similar to what occurs with the portal vein, we can see pulsatility in healthy individuals.34 The femoral pattern may never normalize in chronic pulmonary hypertension, structural tricuspid regurgitation regardless of fluid status. Susceptibility to excessive transducer pressure also needs attention and is dependent on the correct Doppler angle if absolute velocities are being measured (pattern asses-sment is less angle dependent).32

Conclusion

By integrating this ultrasound protocol we will be able to deepen into the pathophysiology of venous congestion and this will allow us to make an individualized adjustment of the patient's therapy.

These tools should be used to determine if congestion is contributing to organ dysfunction and to assess response to decongestant therapy and as a marker of fluid status or volume responsiveness.1 We still have to know which is the best approach for our congestive heart failure patients. In specific cases, such as cardiorenal syndrome, it may be sufficient to evaluate portal and renal veins, without the need to perform a more complex score that is difficult to reproduce in some clinical contexts, or perhaps in some cases might be enough to perform a femoral venous Doppler.

We are sure that evidence about the best approach to evaluate the intravascular volume in an effective and non-invasive way will eventually arise.

REFERENCES

1. Galindo P, Gasca C, Argaiz ER, Koratala A. Point of care venous Doppler ul-trasound: Exploring the missing piece of bedside hemodynamic assessment. World J Crit Care Med. 2021;10:310-22. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i6.310. [ Links ]

2. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1795-815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z. [ Links ]

3. Soliman-Aboumarie H, Denault AY. How to assess systemic venous con-gestion with point of care ultrasound. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;24:177-80. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac239. [ Links ]

4. Deschamps J, Denault A, Galarza L, Rola P, Ledoux-Hutchinson L, Huard K, et al. Venous Doppler to Assess Congestion: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence and Nomenclature. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023;49:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.07.011. [ Links ]

5. Koratala A, Kazory A. Point of Care Ultrasonography for Objective Asses-sment of Heart Failure: Integration of Cardiac, Vascular, and Extravascu-lar Determinants of Volume Status. Cardiorenal Med. 2021;11:5-17. doi: 10.1159/000510732. [ Links ]

6. Verbrugge FH, Guazzi M, Testani JM, Borlaug BA. Altered Hemodyna-mics and End-Organ Damage in Heart Failure: Impact on the Lung and Kidney. Circulation. 2020;142:998-1012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONA-HA.119.045409. [ Links ]

7. Verbrugge FH, Dupont M, Steels P, Grieten L, Malbrain M, Tang WH, et al. Abdominal contributions to cardiorenal dysfunction in congestive heart fai-lure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:485-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.070 [ Links ]

8. Schroedter WB, White JM, Garcia AR, Ellis ME. Presence of Lower-Extre-mity Venous Pulsatility is not always the Result of Cardiac Dysfunction. J VascUltrasound. 2014;38:71-5. doi:10.1177/154431671403800201- 75. [ Links ]

9. Tang WH, Kitai T. Intrarenal Venous Flow: A window into the congestive kidney failure phenotype of heart failure? JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4:683-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.05.009. [ Links ]

10. Mesin L, Albani S, Sinagra G. Non-invasive estimation of right atrial pressure using inferior vena cava echography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45:1331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.12.013. [ Links ]

11. Kircher BJ, Himelman RB, Schiller NB. Noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:493-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90711-9. [ Links ]

12. Blehar DJ, Resop D, Chin B, Dayno M, Gaspari R. Inferior vena cava dis-placement during respirophasic ultrasound imaging. Crit Ultrasound J. 2012;4:18. doi: 10.1186/2036-7902-4-18. [ Links ]

13. Furtado S, Reis L. Inferior vena cava evaluation in fluid therapy decision making in intensive care: practical implications. Rev Bras Terap Intensiva. 2019;31:240-7. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190039. [ Links ]

14. González Delgado DA, Romero González GA. Valoración ultrasonografica de la congestión venosa: VExUS una herramienta de medicina de preci-sión a pie de cama. Rev Ecocar Pract. 2021;4:52-4. [ Links ]

15. Gallix BP, Taourel P, Dauzat M, Bruel JM, Lafortune M. Flow pulsatility in the portal venous system: a study of Doppler sonography in healthy adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:141-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.1.9207514. [ Links ]

16. Denault AY, Beaubien-Souligny W, Elmi-Sarabi M, Eljaiek R, El-Hamamsy I, Lamarche Y, et al. Clinical Significance of Portal Hypertension Diag-nosed With Bedside Ultrasound After Cardiac Surgery. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1109-15. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001812. [ Links ]

17. Ikeda Y, Ishii S, Yazaki M, Fujita T, Iida Y, Kaida T, et al. Portal congestion and intestinal edema in hospitalized patients with heart failure. Heart Ves-sels. 2018;33:740-51. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1117-5. [ Links ]

18. Bouabdallaoui N, Beaubien-Souligny W, Oussaïd E, Henri C, Racine N, Denault AY, et al. Assessing Splanchnic Compartment Using Portal Ve-nous Doppler and Impact of Adding It to the EVEREST Score for Risk Assessment in Heart Failure. CJC Open. 2020;2:311-20. doi: 10.1016/j. cjco.2020.03.012. [ Links ]

19. Bouabdallaoui N, Beaubien-Souligny W, Denault AY, Rouleau JL. Impacts of right ventricular function and venous congestion on renal response du-ring depletion in acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7:1723-34. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12732. [ Links ]

20. Romero-González G, Manriquea J, Castaño-Bilbaoa I, Slon-Robleroa F, Ronco C. PoCUS: Congestión y ultrasonido dos retos para la nefrología de la próxima década. Nefrologia. 2022;42:501-620. [ Links ]

21. de la Espriella-Juan R, Núñez E, Miñana G, Sanchis J, Bayés-Genís A, González J, et al. Intrarenal venous flow in cardiorenal syndrome: a shi-ning light into the darkness. ESC Heart Fail. 2018;5:1173-5. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12362. [ Links ]

22. Abhilash K. Venous congestion assessment using point-of-care Doppler ultrasound: Welcome to the future of volume status assessment. Clin Case Rep.2021; 9;1805 - 07. [ Links ]

23. Mahmud S, Koratala A. Assessment of venous congestion by Doppler ul-trasound: a valuable bedside diagnostic tool for the new-age nephrologist. CEN Case Rep. 2021;10:153-5. doi: 10.1007/s13730-020-00514-5. [ Links ]

24. Beaubien-Souligny W, Rola P, Haycock K, Bouchard J, Lamarche Y, Spie-gel R, Denault AY. Quantifying systemic congestion with Point-Of-Care ul-trasound: development of the venous excess ultrasound grading system. Ultrasound J. 2020;12:16. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00163-w. [ Links ]

25. Tung-Chen Y, García de Casasola-Sánchez G, Méndez-Bailón M. Medi-ción de la congestión venosa empleando la ecografía: protocolo VExUS. Galicia Clin. 2022; 83: 32-7. [ Links ]

26. Steven C. Unvexing the vexus score: am overview, PoCUS Clinical Pearl. DalEM PoCUS Elective. PGY2 Internal Medicine University of Toronto. To-ronto: UT; 2018. [ Links ]

27. Torres-Arrese M, Mata-Martínez A, Luordo-Tedesco D, García-Casa-sola G, Alonso-González R, Montero-Hernández E, et al. Usefulness of Systemic Venous Ultrasound Protocols in the Prognosis of Heart Failu-re Patients: Results from a Prospective Multicentric Study. J Clin Med. 2018;12:1281. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041281 [ Links ]

28. Torres-Arrese M, Mata-Martínez A, Luordo-Tedesco D, García-Casasola G, Alonso-González R, Montero-Hernández E, et al. Usefulness of syste-mic venous ultrasound protocols in the prognosis of heart failure patients: results from a prospective multicentric study. J Clin Med. 2023;12:1281. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041281. [ Links ]

29. Istrail L, Kiernan J, Stepanova M. A novel method for estimating right atrial pressure with point-of-care ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023;36:278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2022.12.008. [ Links ]

30. Simon MA, Schnatz RG, Romeo JD, Pacella JJ. Bedside ultrasound as-sessment of jugular venous compliance as a potential point-of-care me-thod to predict acute decompensated heart failure 30-day readmission. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008184. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008184. [ Links ]

31. Istrail L, Stepanova M. Novel point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) technique to modernize the JVP exam and rule out elevated right atrial pressures. medRxiv 2021.10.14.21264891. doi: 10.1101/2021.10.14.21264891 [ Links ]

32. Torres-Arrese M, Mata-Martínez A, Luordo-Tedesco D, García-Casasola-Sánchez G, Montero-Hernández E, Cobo-Marcos M, et al. Papel del Doppler de la vena femoral en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda: resultados de un estudio multicéntrico prospectivo, Rev Clín Esp. 2023 (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2023.03.002. [ Links ]

33. Calderone A, Hammoud A, Jarry S, Denault A, Couture EJ. femoral vein pulsatility: what does it mean? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35:2521-7 doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.03.027. [ Links ]

34. Bhardwaj V, Rola P, Denault A, Vikneswaran G, Spiegel R. Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment. Ultrasound J. 2023;15:24. doi: 10.1186/s13089-023-00321-w. [ Links ]

35. Finnerty NM, Panchal AR, Boulger C, Vira A, Bischof JJ, Amick C, et al. Inferior Vena Cava Measurement with Ultrasound: What Is the Best View and Best Mode? West J Emerg Med. 2017;18:496-501. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.12.32489. [ Links ]

36. Huguet R, Fard D, d&apos;Humieres T, Brault-Meslin O, Faivre L, Nahory L, et al. Three-Dimensional Inferior Vena Cava for Assessing Central Venous Pressure in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31:1034-43. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.04.003. [ Links ]

37. Seo Y, Iida N, Yamamoto M, Machino-Ohtsuka T, Ishizu T, Aonuma K. Estimation of Central Venous Pressure Using the Ratio of Short to Long Diameter from Cross-Sectional Images of the Inferior Vena Cava. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.12.002. [ Links ]

38. Romero-González G, Manrique J, Castaño-Bilbao I, Slon-Roblero MF, Ronco C. PoCUS: Congestion and ultrasound two challenges for nephro-logy in the next decade. Nefrologia. 2022;42:501-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ne-froe.2021.09.008. [ Links ]

39. Beaubien-Souligny W, Denault AY. Real-Time Assessment of Renal Ve-nous Flow by Transesophageal Echography During Cardiac Surgery. A A Pract. 2019;12:30-2. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000841. [ Links ]

Suporte Financeiro: O presente trabalho não foi suportado por nenhum subsídio o bolsa ou bolsa.

Proveniência e Revisão por Pares: Não comissionado; revisão externa por pares.

Financial Support: This work has not received any contribution grant or scholarship.

Provenance and Peer Review: Not commissioned; externally peer re-viewed.

© Autor (es) (ou seu (s) empregador (es)) e Revista SPMI 2023. Reutilização permitida de acordo com CC BY. Nenhuma reutilização comercial. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) and SPMI Journal 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use.

Recebido: 01 de Junho de 2023; Aceito: 03 de Junho de 2023

Correspondence / Correspondência: Dolores Vazquez - mdgv1107@gmail.com Serviço de Medicina Interna, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal Sete Fontes - São Victor, 4710-243, Braga

Declaração de Contribuição DV, SA; SGC, IFS, YT_C - Redação do artigo, revisão e aprovação final Todos os autores aprovaram a versão final a ser submetida. Contributorship Statement DV, SA; SGC, IFS, YT_C - Writing of the article, revision and final approval All authors approved the final draft.

Conflitos de Interesse: Os autores declaram não possuir conflitos de interesse.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Creative Commons License Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto sob uma licença Creative Commons