SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número2Sequelas tardias de infeção congénita por citomegalovírus - A urgência de uma abordagem neonatalRetinopatia da prematuridade: Resultados de 8 anos de uma unidade de cuidados intensivos neonatais portuguesa índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Nascer e Crescer

versão impressa ISSN 0872-0754versão On-line ISSN 2183-9417

Nascer e Crescer vol.32 no.2 Porto jun. 2023  Epub 30-Jun-2023

https://doi.org/10.25753/birthgrowthmj.v32.i2.26194 

Artigo Original

Referral to a pediatric outpatient Immunology and Allergy consultation at a university hospital

Referenciação à consulta de Imunoalergologia em idade pediátrica de um hospital universitário

1. Department of Immunoalergology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António. 4099-001 Porto, Portugal. filipair.santos@gmail.com; joanamngouveia@gmail.com; inesffalcao@hotmail.com; maluis234@gmail.com; isabelrezende26@gmail.com; injesrjmcunha@gmail.com; evamariasrg@gmx.com; leonorcunhagraca@sapo.pt; falcao.helena@gmail.com


Abstract

Introduction:

Allergic diseases are common in pediatric age and their prevalence has increased in recent years. The literature is scarce regarding the referral of pediatric patients to the Allergy and Clinical Immunology outpatient clinic at tertiary hospitals, but this is relevant because, in addition to being responsible for the diagnosis and management of allergic diseases, this specialty mainly provides outpatient care.

Objective:

This study aimed to describe the origin and reason for referral of patients to the Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital.

Material and Methods:

Retrospective study including all first appointments of patients referred to the Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital between January and December 2020. Patients’ demographic data, as well as origin and reason for referral were recorded.

Results:

A total of 751 patients were included in the study, 52.5% (n=394) of whom were male. The mean age of referral was nine years (σ ± 5), with most children being under the age of 10. General practitioners were responsible for most referrals (41%) and respiratory diseases were the main reason for referral. Pediatrics was the second most referring specialty overall, mainly due to drug allergy, and the first most referring specialty regarding preschool-aged children. Otorhinolaryngology was responsible for 20% of pediatric referrals, solely due to respiratory diseases. Dermatology was responsible for 1.5%, Stomatology for 0.5%, and Medical Genetics for 0.3% of referrals.

Conclusion:

The authors highlight the importance of inter-specialty communication to avoid unnecessary delays in patient management, with quality of life implications.

Keywords: allergy; immunology; outpatient clinic; pediatric age; referral pattern

Resumo

Introdução:

As doenças alérgicas são comuns em idade pediátrica e a sua prevalência tem vindo a aumentar. Não existem dados na literatura sobre os padrões de referenciação à consulta externa (CE) de Imunoalergologia (IA) Pediátrica em hospitais terciários. Entender o padrão de referenciação a esta consulta é importante, pois a IA como especialidade é responsável pelo diagnóstico, tratamento e orientação adequados das doenças alérgicas, prestando cuidados assistenciais principalmente a nível de ambulatório.

Objetivo:

Descrever a origem e motivo de referenciação à CE de IA em idade pediátrica.

Material e Métodos:

Estudo retrospetivo com inclusão de todas as primeiras consultas de IA de doentes pediátricos realizadas entre janeiro e dezembro de 2020 num hospital terciário. Foram recolhidos dados demográficos (género e idade) e proveniência e motivo da referenciação.

Resultados:

Foram incluídas 751 crianças, 52,5% (n=394) do género masculino, com idade média de 9 anos. Os grupos etários abaixo dos 10 anos foram os mais referenciados. A Medicina Geral e Familiar foi responsável pelo maior número de referenciações (41%), sendo a doença respiratória o principal motivo. A Pediatria foi a segunda especialidade que mais doentes referenciou (36%), sobretudo por casos de alergia a fármacos, tendo sido responsável pelo maior número de referenciações de crianças em idade pré-escolar. A Otorrinolaringologia referenciou 20% dos casos, todos por devido a doença respiratória. Os restantes casos foram referenciados pela Dermatologia (1,5%), Estomatologia (0,5%) e Genética Médica (0,3%).

Conclusão:

Os autores realçam a importância da comunicação entre especialidades, de modo a não atrasar a orientação destes doentes, o que poderá ter implicações significativas na sua qualidade de vida.

Palavras-chave: consulta externa; Imunoalergologia; idade pediátrica; padrão de referenciação

Introduction

Allergic diseases are common in pediatric age and one of the main morbidity causes.1) The last decades have witnessed a significant increase in the prevalence of these diseases2,3, namely asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR), and atopic eczema (AE), but also food allergies (FA) and drug allergies (DA).4 Estimates indicate that 4.3% of the EUA population has asthma, with a higher annual prevalence in children (9.5%) compared to adults (7.7%) according to U.S data from 2008-2010.5 AR is one of the conditions with higher prevalence worldwide,6 affecting about 40% of the pediatric population.3 AE has an estimated prevalence of 15−30% in pediatric age and a growing incidence primarily in industrialized countries.3 Hypersensitivity drug reactions have been associated with longer hospitalizations and are often under or overdiagnosed, leading to limitations in patients’ therapeutic options.7 Similarly to other allergic conditions, FA represents an important public health concern4 and is associated with a negative impact on patients’ quality of life.8,9

Developments in scientific research have improved the understanding of the pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatment of allergic diseases.10 Concurrently, advances in new technologies have also improved the diagnosis of these conditions and diversified the therapeutic options available in Allergy and Clinical Immunology (ACI).10 The allergist has thus become the most competent specialist in the individual management of allergic diseases.11

Understanding the patterns of referral of patients to the outpatient consultation (OC) of ACI is of great relevance, as ACI not only provides outpatient care, but is also responsible for diagnosing, treating, and managing allergic conditions. This study aimed to describe the origin and reasons for referral of patients to ACI OC, with the aim of improving the medical care provided.

Materials and method

This was a retrospective study comprising all pediatric age groups (0-18 years old) attending an ACI first consultation at a tertiary hospital between January and December 2020. Demographic data (gender and age), origin of referral, and reason for referral were collected from patients’ medical records. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 22.0.

Results

A total of 751 children were included in this study, 52.5% (n=394) of whom male, with a median age of nine years (P25 5 years−P75 13 years). The 0−5-year age group was the most frequently referred to consultation (Figure 1). Patients were referred to ACI OC by general practitioners (GP), pediatricians, and otorhinolaryngologists (ENT), among other specialists.

GP referred 41% (n=310) of patients, mainly for suspicion of rhinitis and/or asthma (n=164; 53%), followed by cutaneous pathology (n=59; 19%), DA (n=47; 15%), and FA (n=37; 12%). Allergy to Hymenoptera venom motivated three referrals (Table 1). Pediatricians referred 36% (n=274) of patients, of whom 69% (n=189) came from the GP’s outpatient consultation and Pediatric sub-specialities, 29% (n=80) from the Emergency Department (ED), and 2% (n=5) from hospitalization. Patients coming from GP’s outpatient consultation and from Pediatric subspecialities were referred due to rhinitis and/or asthma (n=98; 52%), FA (n=39; 20%), DA (n=26; 14%), or cutaneous diseases (n=26; 14%). Patients coming from the ED were mainly referred for DA (n=54; 67%), followed by FA (n=11; 14%), asthma and/or rhinitis (n=8; 10%), and cutaneous diseases (n=7; 9%). Regarding hospitalized patients, 80% (n=4) were seen due to DA and 20% (n=1) due to FA (Table 1). ENT specialists referred 20% (n=150) of patients, with respiratory diseases being the sole reason for referral (85% AR, 13% AR and asthma, and 2% only asthma; Table 2). In addition, a minor proportion of patients were also referred by Dermatology (1.5%), Stomatology (0,5%), and Medical Genetics (0.3%).

Figure 1 Number of patients referred to the Allergy and Clinical Immunology outpatient consultation, by speciality and age group. 

Table 1 Reasons for patient referral to the ACI consultation by GP and pediatricians 

Rhinitis/asthma Cutaneous diseases Drug allergy Food allergy Hymenoptera venom allergy
GP 41% (n=310) 53% (n=164) 19% (n=59) 15% (n=47) 12% (n=37) 1% (n=3)
Pediatrics 36% (n=274) Outpatient Department 69% (n=189) 52% (n=98) 14% (n=26) 14% (n=26) 20% (n=39) --
Emergency Department 29% (n=80) 10% (n=8) 9% (n=7) 67% (n=54) 14% (n=11) --
Hospitalization 2% (n=5) -- -- 80% (n=4) 20% (n=1) --

ACI, Allergy and Clinical Immunology; GP, General and Family Practice

Table 2 Reasons for patient referral to the ACI consultation by ENT 

Rhinitis and/or Asthma Allergic rhinitis Asthma Cutaneous diseases Drug allergy Food allergy Hymenoptera venom allergy
ENT 20% (n=150) 13% (n=19) 85% (n=128) 2% (n=3) -- -- -- --

ENT, otorhinolaryngologists

Discussion and conclusions

This study allowed to retrieve a global perception of the intercommunication between different medical specialities and ACI. The referral pattern to ACI OC denoted the general knowledge of other specialities regarding ACI and emphasized the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and management of ACI patients.

GP were responsible for the largest number of referrals to hospital services, highlighting the awareness of these physicians and the good cooperation between primary and secondary care. This cooperation has been continuously reinforced in conferences, courses, and training programmes directed at primary care. On the other hand, patients with allergic diseases are complex, and the care initiated by GP may require follow-up and optimization by the allergist/immunologist. The support provided by ACI is crucial both to patients and GP, as evidenced by the demand, not only during the 1994-1997 period, but also nowadays.12

After GP, pediatricians were responsible for referring the second largest number of patients to the ACI OC. Regarding age groups, pediatricians referred the largest number of patients under the age of five (Figure 1). Both Pediatric and ACI departments are located in a tertiary hospital centre, often sharing the same physical space in Day Hospital and OC. Moreover, ACI and Pediatric specialities share great proximity in terms of specific training, with ACI internships including a long rotation in Pediatrics. Close proximity between these professionals is therefore assured, promoting interactions that often display liminal characteristics when dealing with patients of pediatric age.

The third speciality referring the largest number of patients to the ACI OD was ENT. Respiratory diseases were the only reason for referral, showing the complementary approach of the two specialties to the study of airways.

AR and asthma have a high prevalence in pediatric age, being the most common chronic diseases in this population and having a great impact on patients’ quality of life and health care costs.14 In this study, respiratory diseases were the main cause fir referral to the ACI OD by all specialties. It is therefore crucial that these patients are referred early to ACI consultation, avoiding diagnostic and treatment delays.9 In 1998, Falcão H. et al. defined the criteria for admission and discharge of pediatric patients to the ACI OD.12 The authors also reported that most patients were referred to ACI from GP. As for the remaining specialities, the authors found ENT to be responsible for 18% of referrals, and pediatricians for 12%. In the present study, pediatricians referred 36% of cases, emphasising ACI’s increasing support to pediatricians. In both cases, the main reason for referral was respiratory diseases.12

Although DA were the second reason for general referral in this study (n=131; 17.4%), they were the main reason for referrals coming from pediatric hospitalization and ED (Table 2). Besides reflecting an increase in the incidence of these conditions, this also suggests that these cases should be more often investigated. DA suspicion frequently occurs while treating infectious diseases related to the respiratory system. The high variability of exanthematic reactions associated with infections, including viral ones, can often hinder the diagnosis.13 Clarifying suspected DA cases may prevent the use of drugs with low safety and efficacy and high cost.14 The number of cases referred to the ACI Department probably reflects a better targeted and justified referral to the ACI OD. On the other hand, the availability of distinct consultations for FA and DA may also partially account for the increase in referrals associated with both.12

Cutaneous diseases represented the third cause for general referral. These represent one of the first manifestations of allergic march, being the first step in the development and perpetuation of mechanisms leading to other conditions, such as FA, asthma, and AR.15,16

FA suspicion was the fourth reason for general referral and the third reason for pediatric referral. The frequency of referrals motivated by FA suspicion tripled within twenty years.12 Currently, FA is estimated to affect up to 10% of the pediatric population and 2% of the adult population globally with Europe reporting an increase in severe allergic reactions to food among children.19

Severe allergic reactions to Hymenoptera venom in children are scarce (0.15−0.3%), and in this study they comprised the fifth cause of referral to the ACI OD. Consultation for suspicion of this reaction was only requested by GP, who usually represented the first contact of patients after the sting, which generally occurs in rural areas.

The present study has the limitations intrinsic to a retrospective observational study, relying on the analysis of medical records, and to a unicentric study. Still, it provides insights that can contribute to improving the medical care provided by the ACI Department, namely through the development of protocols and implementation of measures to optimize the communication between medical specialities and ACI, avoiding diagnostic delays and improving patient management, with improved quality of life.

Authorship

Filipa Rodrigues dos Santos - Conceptualization; Writing - original draft; Data curation

Joana Gouveia - Data curation

Inês Falcão - Data curation

Maria Luís Marques - Writing - review & editing

Isabel Rezende - Writing - review & editing

Inês Cunha - Writing - review & editing

Eva Gomes - Writing - review & editing

Leonor Cunha - Writing - review & editing

Helena Falcão - Supervision; Writing - review & editing

References

1. Pawankar R. Allergic diseases and asthma: a global public health concern and a call to action. World Allergy Organ J. 2014;7(1):12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-4551-7-12. [ Links ]

2. Asher MI, Montefort S, Björkstén B, Lai CKW, Strachan DP, Weiland SK, et al. Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. Lancet. 2006;368(9537):733-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69283-0 [ Links ]

3. Pawankar R, Canonica GW, Holgate ST, Lockey R. WAO White Book on Allergy 2011-2012: Executive Summary. 1st Edition. UK. 2011; p.27. [ Links ]

4. Prescott S, Allen KJ. Food allergy: riding the second wave of the allergy epidemic. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011; 22(2):155-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01145.x. [ Links ]

5. Loftus PA, Wise SK. Epidemiology of asthma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 24(3): 245-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000262. [ Links ]

6. Brozek JL , Bousquet J, Agache I, Agarwal A, Bachert C, Bosnic-Anticevich S, et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines-2016 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017; 140(4): 950-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050. [ Links ]

7. Demoly P, Adkinson NF, Brockow K, Castells M, Chiriac AM, Greenberger PA, et al. International Consensus on drug allergy. Allergy. 2014; 69(4): 420-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12350. [ Links ]

8. Prescott SL, Pawankar R, Allen KJ, Campbell DE, Sinn J, Fiocchi A, et al. A global survey of changing patterns of food allergy burden in children. World Allergy Organ J. 2013; 4;6(1):21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-4551-6-21. [ Links ]

9. Sicherer SH, Noone SA, Munoz-Furlong A. The impact of childhood food allergy on quality of life. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001;87(6):461-4. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62258-2. [ Links ]

10. Simon D. Recent Advances in Clinical Allergy and Immunology. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018; 177(4): 324-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000494931. [ Links ]

11. Del Giacco S, Rosenwasser LJ, Crisci CD, Frew AJ, Kaliner MA, Lee BW, et al. Position statement of the WAO Specialty and Training Council: What is an Allergist?: Reconciled Document Incorporating Member Society Comments, September 3, 2007. World Allergy Organ J. 2008; 1(1): 19-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/wox.0b013e3181651679. [ Links ]

12. Falcão H, Rocha A, Miguel N, Morais L. Consulta Externa de Imunoalergologia num hospital pediátrico. Cadernos de Imunoalergologia Ped. 1988; 13(1): 11-6. [ Links ]

13. Gomes, ER, Brockow, K, Kuyucu, S, Saretta, F, Mori, F, Blanca-Lopez, et al. ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group. Drug hypersensitivity in children: report from the pediatric task force of the EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group. Allergy. 2016;71(2):149-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12774. [ Links ]

14. Sobrino, Miriam Macías E, Lázaro-Sastre M, de Arriba-Méndez S, Dávila I. A Prospective Study of Costs Associated with the Evaluation of ß-Lactam Allergy in Children. J Pediatr. 2020;223:108-13.e2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.04.018. [ Links ]

15. Mir E, Panjabi C, Shah A. Impact of allergic rhinitis in school going children. Asia Pac Allergy. 2012;2(2):93-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2012.2.2.93. [ Links ]

16. Wahn U. Allergic March. September 2015. Accessed 2021 Oct. Available at https://www.worldallergy.org/education-and-programs/education/allergic-disease-resource-center/professionals/the-allergic-march. [ Links ]

17. Renz H, Allen KJ, Sicherer SH, Sampson HA, Lack G, Beyer K, et al. Food allergy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018; 4:17098. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.98. [ Links ]

18. Morais A, Prates S, Pargana E, Arêde C, Godinho N, Tavares C, et al. Alergia alimentar em crianças numa consulta de Imunoalergologia. Rev. Port. Imunoalergol. 2021 7(3): 167-71. [ Links ]

19. ISAAC (International Study of Asthma and Allergies in childhood). Accessed in 2021 Oct. Available at http://isaac.auckland.ac.nz/. [ Links ]

Received: January 08, 2022; Accepted: April 22, 2022

Correspondence to Filipa Rodrigues dos Santos Department of Immunoalergology Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António Largo Professor Abel Salazar 4099-001 Porto Email: filipair.santos@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License