SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue2Folic acid, vitamin B12, and psychotic symptoms among young psychiatric inpatientsLanguage regression as a manifestation of epilepsy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Nascer e Crescer

Print version ISSN 0872-0754On-line version ISSN 2183-9417

Nascer e Crescer vol.30 no.2 Porto June 2021  Epub June 30, 2021

https://doi.org/10.25753/birthgrowthmj.v30.i2.20443 

Original Articles

Parental support and perceived self-efficacy − a study of parental perceptions in an early childhood child psychiatry unit

Apoio parental e competência parental percecionada − estudo de perceções parentais numa unidade pedopsiquiátrica de primeira infância

Catarina Garcia Ribeiro1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3533-7776

Pedro Dias1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2999-8543

Ivo Peixoto1 

Rita Ganhoto1 

Salomé Silva2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-6570

Pedro Caldeira da Silva1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8550-1298

1 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hospital Dona Estefânia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central. 1169-045 Lisboa, Portugal. catarinagarciaribeiro@gmail.com; dias_online@sapo.pt; ivopintopeixoto@gmail.com; ritaganhoto@gmail.com; pedrocds@gmail.com;

2 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental. 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal. salome.mecas@gmail.com


Abstract

Introduction:

Perceived parental self-efficacy (PSE) has shown an association with positive parental behavior, highlighting its benefit in promoting child well-being and healthy development. The identification of its potential determinants remains a focus of attention in mental health when assessing parental perceptions and cognitions or planning parental interventions.

Material/Methods:

This was a cross-sectional study in an Early Childhood Child Psychiatry Unit. All parents of babies and toddlers assessed for the first time were included and completed a Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC) scale (portuguese translation, α= 0.75-0.83) and two additional questions concerning perceptions of support from the other parent and family of origin. Average PSOC was compared between both parents and correlations with perceptions of support were tested. Statistical analysis was conducted in SPSS® version 21 through descriptive analysis and variable correlation (t-test and Pearson r).

Results:

A total of thirty-four questionnaires were completed. Average PSOC was similar between father and mothers (73.44 vs 72.24, p=0.533). Fathers perceived themselves as more supported than mothers, either from the family of origin (5.09 vs 4.21, p=0.001), as from the other parent (4.91 vs 4.09, p=0.011). A positive correlation was found between father’s PSOC and perception of support from the family of origin (r=0.639, p <0.01).

Conclusions:

Among mothers of children followed in this Child Psychiatry Unit, support perceptions did not correlate with perceived parental self-efficacy. However, father’s perceived self-efficacy could relate to perceptions of support, raising clinical attention on how fathers and their family of origin can influence the relational triad. Perceptions of parental support should be explored when considering within-family horizontal relations as a potential mechanism influencing vertical relations through its association with perceived self-efficacy.

Keywords: early childhood; parental perception; parental support; self efficacy

Resumo

Introdução:

A Competência Parental Percecionada (PSE) tem sido associada a comportamentos parentais positivos e, consequentemente, promotores do bem-estar e desenvolvimento harmonioso da criança. A identificação dos seus potenciais determinantes continua a ser um foco de atenção em saúde mental ao avaliar as perceções e cognições parentais ou ao planear intervenções com os mesmos.

Materiais/Métodos:

Este foi um estudo transversal com uma amostra clínica de uma Unidade de Pedopsiquiatria da Primeira Infância. Todos os pais de crianças avaliadas pela primeira vez foram incluídos e preencheram o questionário de Sentimento de Competência Parental (Parenting Sense of Competence); tradução portuguesa, α=0.75-0.83) e duas perguntas sobre a perceção de apoio recebido pelo outro progenitor e pela família de origem. Foram corretamente preenchidos 34 questionários. A perceção média de competência parental foi comparada entre ambos os pais e foi testada a correlação com as perceções de apoio. A análise estatística foi efetuada no software SPSS® versão 21 através de análise descritiva e correlação de dados (t-test e Pearson r).

Resultados:

Um total de 34 questionários foram preenchidos. O Sentimento de Competência Parental não diferiu significativamente entre pai e mãe (73.44 vs 72.24, p=0.533). Os pais percecionam-se como mais apoiados, quer pela família de origem (5.09 vs 4.2, p=0.001), quer pelas mães (4.9 vs 4.09, p=0.011). Foi identificada no pai uma correlação positiva entre o Sentimento de Competência Parental e o Sentimento de Apoio pela Família de Origem (Pearson r=0.639, p<0.01).

Conclusão:

Entre as mães, as perceções de apoio não se correlacionaram com o sentimento de competência parental. Contudo, a correlação encontrada entre os pais enfatiza como a respetiva família de origem poderá influenciar a tríade relacional. As perceções de apoio parental deverão ser exploradas ao considerar as relações horizontais intrafamiliares como um potencial mecanismo de influência das relações verticais, pela sua associação com a competência parental percecionada.

Palavras-chave: apoio parental; competência parental percecionada; perceção parental; primeira infância

Introduction

The present study started from a reflection on the potential benefit of identifying parental perceived self-efficacy (PSE) determinants, as it has been linked to a number of relevant parental and child outcomes.1,2 PSE can be defined as the level of confidence felt by caregivers during daily parenthood challenges. It can be usually classified in three distinct dimensions: task-especific, domain-specific, and general or broad, based on Bandura’s conceptual framework.3,4 According to previous investigations, it is an important determinant of positive parental behavior and hence of good development and child well-being.1,2,5,6 When looking at the underlying factors regarding PSE, there is considerable evidence of parental depression and infant behavior as two important variables inversely correlated in cross-sectional studies.7,8 Self-efficacy as initially conceptualized could be useful in parenting challenges, reciprocally interacting with performance. Although parental depression and measures of psychological well-being have been studied, there is a lack of information regarding each parent individually. Regarding fathers, much remains to be known about PSE during early childhood. Regarding mothers, an inverse relation has been shown between PSE and depressive and anxious conditions, as well as an insecure attachment pattern.7,8 From the toddler perspective, better adjustment capacity, greater enthusiasm, and less avoiding behavior and negativism have been shown in those taken care of by parents with higher PSE.2,7,8

The New Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood DC:0-5 pays particular attention to relational information (which can be included in a new Axis I diagnostic category) as a movement to better classify the network of close relationships surrounding the child.10 During clinical practice in a Child Psychiatry Unit, assessment of parental perceptions holds an important position, as it can influence not only behavior but also how relational experience is integrated. From this starting point, this study aimed to explore how parental beliefs could relate to their own psychologic well-being and explore the role of family interactions as a relevant mediator.

From the importance of a perception-mediated construct, this study sought to investigate the relevance of other perceptions potentially relevant for parents, namely parental support. Specifically, the study aimed to assess parental perceptions of mutual support and support from each parent’s family of origin, thus exploring horizontal relations within the family as a potential mechanism influencing vertical (parent-child) relations through association with PSE. More than quantifying help and behavior, the study’s main interest was to investigate how support is mentally integrated as a feeling or cognition, accessible through perceptions rather than through inventory and description of concrete actions. The hypothesis under investigation is the existence of a link between perception of mutual support or perception of support from the family of origin and parental PSE.

Materials and methods

Study design: Cross-sectional, clinical sample.

Sample: Parents of babies and toddlers assessed for the first time in an Early Childhood Child Psychiatry Unit.

Exclusion Criteria: 1) Children attending foster residential care or raised by other than biological or foster parents; 2) Death of a parent; 3) Physical abuse or any legal situation.

Data collection: Self-completed parental Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC) scale (portuguese translation, reported internal consistency α=0.75-0.83) and two additional questions concerning perception of support from the other parent (SOP) and from the family of origin (SFO) completed at the end of the first medical appointment or at the beggining of the second one.

Presence of the other parent when completing the form was registered by the physician, in an effort to look at possible bias generated by inhibition or interference when declaring support perceptions. Two distincts situations were identified: simultaneity and non-simultaneity.

Assessment scale: Portuguese version of PSOC: Escala de Sentimento de Competência Parental - ESCP).11 Support perceptions were addressed through two additional questions also evaluated in a Likert scale concerning support perception from the other parent and from one’s own family of origin. Formulation of additional questions had a similar presentation to the original PSOC instrument: “I feel supported and understood by the father/mother of the child” and “I feel supported and understood by my family”. Answers were quantitative and dichotomous - negative from 1 to 3 and positive from 4 to 6.

PSOC is a self-reported questionnaire with 17 different items which allow to evaluate perception of general sense of competence in two main dimensions: self-efficacy and parental satisfaction, with reported Cronbach alpha values of 0.75 and 0.76, respectively. The scale has been redesigned to its current formulation by Johnston and Mash and does not include a cutoff threshold. It has been tested in the portuguese population, and a factorial analysis considering satisfaction, self-efficacy, and interest confirmed its validity.11

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS® version 21. Inferential analysis was performed through t-test for unpaired samples and variable correlation was performed through Pearson r. The level of significance admitted in the presente study was 0.05.

Results

Descriptive analysis

A sample of 34 correctly completed questionnaires was collected, with an average maternal and paternal age of 32.8 and 37.3 years, respectively. Regarding educational level, most parents had higher education (20 mothers and 18 fathers), followed by highschool (11 mothers and 11 fathers) and basic (three mothers and five fathers) education.

Figure 1 Parental distribution by age 

Inferential analysis

No significant differences were found between average PSOC in fathers versus mothers (73.44 vs 72.24, p=0.533). Perception of SFO in fathers achieved a superior average score than in mothers (5.09 vs 4.21, p=0.001). Perception of SOP in fathers was also higher compared to mothers (4.91 vs 4.09, p=0.011).

Table 1 PSOC (Parenting Sense of Competence), SFO (Perceived Support from Family of Origin) and SOP (Perceived Support from the Other Parent) 

Table 2 Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC) in Mothers and Fathers - average correlation 

Table 2.1 Perception of Support from Family of Origin (SFO) in mothers and fathers 

Table 2.2 Perception of Support from the Other Parent (SOP) in mothers and fathers 

When analyzing presence of the other parent as an interference factor individually, mother’s PSOC did not significantly change when answering in presence of the father (simultaneity situation; 69.76 vs 76.11, p=0.187). Father’s average PSOC in presence of the mother also did not significantly change (73.16 vs 72.0, p=0.706). When analyzing simultaneity effect, neither parental PSOC reached statistical significance, despite a descending trend observed in mother’s PSOC in the simultaneity situation.

Table 3 Presence of the other parent during evaluation and PSOC correlation 

Results: Father

A positive correlation was found between PSOC and perception of SFO in fathers (r=0.639, p<0.01).

No significant correlation was found between PSOC and perception of SOP in fathers (r=0.289; p=0.098), as well as between perception of SOP and perception of SFO.

Table 4 Correlation analysis of Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC) and perception of Support from Family of Origin (SFO) in fathers 

Table 5 Correlation analysis of Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC) and perception of Support from the Other Parent (SOP) in fathers 

Results: Mother

When analyzing maternal results, no correlation was found between PSOC and perception of SOP or SFO.

Also no association was found between perception of SOP and perception of SFO in mothers.

Table 6 Correlation analysis of Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC) and perception of Support from the Other Parent (SOP) in mothers 

Table 7 Correlation analysis of Parenting Sense of Competence (PSOC) and perception of Support from Family of Origin (SFO) in mothers 

Table 8 Correlation analysis of Perception of Support from the Other Parent (SOP) and perception of Support from Family of Origin (SFO) in mothers 

Discussion

As an overview, one might discuss how parental support perceptions could be integrated in the process of developing parental sense of competence. In addition to bringing some insights on how PSE could relate to caregiver’s horizontal network of significative relations, we included fathers in the study design, looking for differences in perceptions between both genders. The impact of family relationships on PSE remains understudied,2 and results from this study may indicate that it is important to separate relationships individually within the family (i.e. marital support and support from family) for environmental assessment, reinforcing the idea of different constructs.

PSE as a measure of parental satisfaction and efficacy is known to promote healthy development of babies and toddlers in the clinical setting. More than quantifying tasks, examining parental behaviors, or assessing marital status or general agreement concerning raising and educational issues, this study looked at perceptions, which can be regarded as one of the structural components of psychic life, called to act during parenthood everyday challenges. The present study does not seem to support an association between higher levels of PSE and more positive family functioning or greater marital satisfaction in the mother, as previously demonstrated.2

Considering the constant emotional interplay between a child and his/her caregiver during early childhood psychic development, it is acknowledged that relational quality and reciprocity could be easily influenced by the emotional status of the caregiver, as it will influence the child’s acquisition of new functional and emotional capabilities. Therefore, the required relational capabilities of the caregiver could in some way depend on the emotional availability from (or, more importantly, on the way it is perceived by) other relevant people with who he relates closer to. The relationship-based therapies delivered during some of our clinical interventions highlight the importance of emotions, not only expressed by the children, but also by caregivers, some of which are secondary to perceptions, cognitions, or beliefs regarding their own individual experience.

There is a growing body of literature focusing on coparenting and whole-family dynamics. Distinct patterns of triadic family interactions have been discerned and the coparenting construct itself can be seen as a specific form of triadic or higher-level family process early in the family life cycle.14 The role of the father within the triadic interaction influences the child’s well-being, not only through his own process of attachment, but also through cooperative and warm interactions, thus increasing coparenting quality.

According to Belsky’s conceptualization of parental behavior, this is the result of the interplay between the child’s temperament and gender, parental personality traits, and social contextual influences. At present, it remains unclear how PSE varies with environmental factors or gender.

When looking at the literature, personal determinants like depression and stress have been inversely correlated with maternal PSE.1,2 PSE may be sensitive to various contextual factors, without identifying family relationships as one of them.12 However, other authors suggest it could depend on the support and encouragement of one’s partner.3 The apparent conflicting evidence regarding mother’s PSE and environmental factors could result from a mostly internalizing functioning compared to fathers, reinforcing the idea of greater independence from outer compared compared with inner variables. In this context, studying parental perceptions could help to clarify the reach of a frequently projective description (towards the family of origin or other parent) regarding the cause of the child‘s difficulties/symptoms/needs or alternatively their own.

The authors’ expectation was to find differences according to the subpopulation of parents, since perception of support could be affected by emotional instability, conflict within the parental couple, or personality traits which could be tested in subsequent analyses. On the other hand, mothers rehearsing a symbiotic appeal or with a mainly fusional vertical relationship with their children usually perceive themselves as more competent. In situations of a burdening diagnosis on axis I, it could also contribute to a lower perception of parental self-efficacy, as previously suggested in the literature.1-8

Regarding gender differences, perception of SFO averaged higher in fathers than in mothers in this study. Additionally, perception of SOP was found to be higher in fathers. No differences were found considering PSE between parents, although theoretically the clinical environment and the fact that most children were boys could interfere with parental perceptions, mostly through the child’s behavior, as the literature finds mothers to rate themselves with lower PSE in a temperamental child.8 Our clinical population of parents, vulnerable by the burden of disease or infant condition, could easily face anxiety, depressive symptoms, or simply tiredness. Additionally, very heterogeneous clinical situations were behind each child psychiatry visit.

The correlation of father’s PSE with their family of origin is in line with existing data, since family environment has been considered a significant factor in father behavior and father-child relationship.13 That could add some insights on how within-family relationships influence men’s self-efficacy and parenting behavior.

Limitations

This study has some limitations that should be acknowledged, as the fact that the assessment was based on self-reported measures and the selection bias of the clinical population of parents enrolled, without sorting children characteristics, behavior, or temperament. Also, the study’s cross-sectional design does not allow causal interpretations. The fact that perception of support was evaluated with a quantitative and dichotomous question may have interfered with answering accuracy, since it implies judgment (although it was stratified in negative [1−3] and positive [4−6]). Although simply and directly formulated, this assessment method is not validated as a perception evaluating instrument. Also, although assumptions for the use of parametric tests (t-test) have been verified in the present study (i.e., normal distribution for samples < 30), the small sample size may have influenced the results obtained.

Conclusion

The initial purpose of identifying associations between parental perceptions and PSE was partially achieved, with a positive correlation between father’s PSE and perception of SFO. Regarding mothers, no significant correlation was found between PSE and perception of support, neither from the father nor from the family of origin. Mothers and fathers did not differ significantly concerning perceived self-efficacy.

Although perception of support from the other parent does not seem to correlate with PSE according to study results, considering the study’s limitations and reduced sample, further insights into gender differences are recommended to individualize clinical therapies.

Further studies are necessary to understand how father’s PSE could be influenced by relevant people with whom he relates closer to during the process of raising babies and toddlers in face of developmental difficulties, thereby adding valuable information when assessing relational context or wider psychosocial elements. In further studies, it could be interesting to correlate parental perceptions with child’s primary diagnosis.

References

1. Sevigny PR, Loutzenhiser L. Predictors of parenting self-efficacy in mothers and fathers of toddlers. Child Care Health Dev. 2010; 36:179-89. [ Links ]

2. Jones TL, Prinz RJ. Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005; 25:341-63. [ Links ]

3. Montigny F, Lacharité C. Perceived parental efficacy: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2005; 49:387-96. ? [ Links ]

4. Johnston C, Mash E. A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1989; 18:167-75. [ Links ]

5. Rikka K, Chloé L, Sari A. Parent's Psychological Well-being and parental self-efficacy in relation to the family's triadic interaction. Infant Mental Health J. 2015; 36:298-307. [ Links ]

6. Chau V, Giallo R. The relationship between parental fatigue, parenting self-efficacy and behaviour: implications for supporting parents in the early parenting period. Child Care Health Dev. 2015; 41:626-33. [ Links ]

7. Kohlhoff J, Barnett B. Parenting self-efficacy: Links with maternal depression, infant behaviour and adult attachment. Early Human Development. 2013; 89:249-56. [ Links ]

8. Cutrona CE, Troutman BR. Social support, infant temperament, and parenting self-efficacy: a mediational model of postpartum depression. Child Dev.1986; 57:1507-18. [ Links ]

9. Zohreh A, Tahmassian K, Ali Mazaheri M. Parental Self-Efficacy as a Determining Factor in Healthy Mother-Child Interaction: A Pilot Study in Iran. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2014; 8. [ Links ]

10. Zeanah CH, Lieberman A. Defining Relational Pathology in Early Childhood: The Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood DC:0-5 Approach. Infant Ment Health J. 2016; 37:509-20. [ Links ]

11. Ferreira B, Veríssimo M, Santos AJ, Fernandes C, Cardoso J. Escala de Sentimento de Competência Parental: Análise confirmatória do modelo de medida numa amostra de pais portugueses. Laboratório de Psicologia. 2011; 9:147-55. [ Links ]

12. Coleman K, Karraker K. Self-Efficacy and Parenting Quality: Findings and Future Applications. Developmental Review. 1998; 18. [ Links ]

13. Davies PT, Cummings EM, Winter MA. Pathways between profiles of family functioning, child security in the interparental subsystem, and child psychological problems. Dev Psychopathol. 2004; 16:525-50. [ Links ]

14. McHale J, Fivaz-Depeursinge E. Understanding triadic and family group process during infancy and early childhood. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 1999; 2:107-27 [ Links ]

Received: July 05, 2020; Accepted: January 28, 2021

Correspondence to Catarina Garcia Ribeiro Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Hospital Dona Estefânia Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central Rua Jacinta Marto 1169-045 Lisboa Email: catarinagarciaribeiro@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License