SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.37 número1Systemic Lupus Concealed in the Shadow of a Primary Membranous Nephropathy DiagnosisMembranous Nephropathy in the Kidney Allograft: The Role of Pre-Implantation Biopsy índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Portuguese Journal of Nephrology & Hypertension

versão impressa ISSN 0872-0169

Port J Nephrol Hypert vol.37 no.1 Lisboa mar. 2023  Epub 30-Mar-2023

https://doi.org/10.32932/pjnh.2023.02.225 

CASE REPORT

Adult-Onset Genetic Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Tale of Two Mutations

Luís Leite de Sousa1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-4669

Gonçalo Pimenta1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-3457

Rita Veríssimo1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-028X

Rita Theias2 

Tiago Carvalho1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4140-8390

1 Nephrology Department, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal

2 Pathology Department, Hospital Professor Fernando da Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal


ABSTRACT

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a kidney histologic lesion that may be caused by multiple aetiologies and pathophysiological mechanisms, with podocyte injury and depletion as the common denominator. FSGS may be subdivided into different subclasses: primary, secondary, genetic and unknown forms. Notwithstanding the overlapping clinical and histological characteristics across the different forms of FSGS, their management and response to treatment are strikingly different. Genetic FSGS may be suggested by the appearance of nephrotic syndrome during childhood, but it may also present in adulthood, where the diagnosis is rather challenging due to widely variable clinical and histological phenotypes. Herein we present the case of a 34-year-old female with a family history of chronic kidney disease of undetermined aetiology, referred for a Nephrology consultation due to haematoproteinuria and de novo arterial hypertension. Complementary evaluation revealed a urinary protein/creatinine ratio of 4.3 g/g and albumin/creatinine ratio of 3.9 g/g with hypoalbuminaemia. Kidney biopsy revealed lesions of FSGS, associated with extensive foot process effacement. The constellation of findings and family history of kidney disease raised the suspicion of a genetic cause, therefore genetic testing was performed. Two variants in the NPHS2 gene [c.686G>A, p.(Arg229Gln) and c.855_856del, p(Arg286Thrfs*17)] were found in compound heterozygosity, compatible with the diagnosis of genetic FSGS. This case highlights the importance of a detailed evaluation of patients with FSGS lesions in order to identify the FSGS form, given its therapeutic and prognostic impact, including after kidney transplantation.

Keywords: Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental/diagnosis; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental/genetics

INTRODUCTION

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a kidney histological lesion, frequently identified in children and adults presenting with nephrotic syndrome. It can be subdivided in primary, secondary, genetic and unknown forms, according to the underlying pathological mechanism. The histological identification of a FSGS lesion should not be the end of the diagnostic work-up, but rather the trigger to identify the underlying causative mechanism, since this has major therapeutic and prognostic implications. We present the case of a patient with genetic FSGS caused by a rare combination of two variants in the NPHS2 gene.

CASE REPORT

We describe the case of a 34-year-old white female, with previous medical history of pre-eclampsia during the first pregnancy (at the age of 20-years old), psoriasis and family history of kidney disease of undetermined aetiology (both maternal grandparents and brother on haemodialysis, mother with chronic kidney disease, no consanguinity.

See Fig. 1 and Table 1 for more information). She was evaluated by a general practitioner in October 2019, where a diagnosis of arterial hypertension was established and she was started on losartan 100 mg per day. One month later, she reported foamy urine and a dipstick test was performed, revealing the presence of proteins and blood in the urine. Sediment analysis revealed dysmorphic red blood cells in the urine. For this reason, she was referred to our Nephrology unit. The patient denied other complaints such as oedema, macroscopic haematuria, polyuria, lumbar pain, anorexia, changes in body weight, consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics or other drugs other than losartan. No extra-renal disease manifestations were identifiable.

Figure 1: Patient’s family pedigree 

Table 1: Clinical and demographical characteristics of affected family members 

INVESTIGATIONS

The relevant bloodwork results are shown in Table 2. We highlight the analytical findings of microscopic haematuria, nephrotic-range proteinuria and concomitant hypoalbuminaemia. Chest X-ray was unremarkable. Kidney ultrasound showed normalsized kidneys with maintained parenchymal thickness and corticomedullary differentiation. Further studies were requested in order to investigate the aetiology of the nephrotic syndrome. ANA, ANCA, anti-soluble nuclear antigen antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (anti-PLA2r) antibodies were negative. Immunoglobulins, serum free light chains and respective ratio, serum protein electrophoresis and complement levels were normal. Infection-related serologies were also performed, with a negative result for hepatitis B and C and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2. Interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) was positive, but the patient did not present any symptoms related to mycobacterial infection and, thus, it was assumed as latent tuberculosis.

Table 2: Relevant bloodwork results in the initial Nephrology evaluation. 

Hb - haemoglobin; LDH - lactate dehydrogenase.

The patient was submitted to a kidney biopsy. In light microscopy (Figs. 2 and 3), 20 glomeruli were observed, two of which presented lesions of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) with not otherwise specified pattern. The remaining glomeruli did not present any lesions. Proximal and distal tubule cells had protein inclusions in the cytoplasm. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were observed in under 10% of the sample. Immunofluorescence study was negative for Immunoglobulins A, G and M, C1, C3, albumin and kappa/lambda light chains. Electron microscopy highlighted podocyte hyperplasia and foot process effacement affecting approximately 50% of the glomerular tuft (Fig. 4).

Figure 2: Light microscopy, 10x, haematoxylin and eosin: segmental thickening of the tuft, highlighting rare xanthomatous endocapillary cells (white arrow) and hint of segmental lesion adhering to Bowman’s capsule (synechia) (black arrow) 

Figure 3: Light microscopy, 10x, haematoxylin and eosin: segmental tuft thickening and synechia (black arrow). 

Figure 4: Electron microscopy, 2000x: portion of the glomerular tuft highlighting segmental foot process effacement in an area of preserved basal membrane (white arrow) and in an area of a collapsed capillary loop (black thick arrow). Foot process effacement was evident in 50% of the glomerular tuft. Areas of foot process preservation were also observed (black thin arrow). 

The findings in our patient, namely the age of onset, absence of known risk factors for secondary FSGS and histological examination, FSGS. Additionally, the patient had a family history of kidney disease of unknown cause. Thus, genetic testing was requested. Genetic study was performed at Genomed laboratory after extraction of DNA from peripheral blood and analysis was conducted using “Twist human core exome plus RefSeq extension” kit (Twist Bioscience) followed by parallel massive sequencing [Next generation sequencing (NGS)] and confirmation by Sanger sequencing for regions not accurately analyzed by NGS. The study showed two variants in the NPHS2 gene: c.686G>A, p.(Arg229Gln), which has been reported as a risk factor for kidney disease when combined with another pathogenic variant in the same gene1; c.855_856del, p(Arg286Thrfs*17), a rare variant described as pathogenic when present in compound heterozygosity with the former c.686G>A, p.(Arg229Gln) mutation.2 Mutations occurring in the NPHS2 gene are associated with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) (OMIM 600995) with an autosomal recessive inheritance, compatible with the diagnosis of genetic FSGS.

TREATMENT, OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

While waiting on the results of electron microscopy and genetic testing, given the clinical picture and the light microscopy findings, the patient was started on corticosteroids (prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day), after adequate immunizations, and also tuberculosis prophylaxis with isoniazid and pyridoxine, due to positive IGRA. No improvement was recorded after initiation of therapy, and, additionally, during this period, the result of the genetic test and electron microscopy was made available. Thus, after 9 weeks of treatment she started tapering and later suspended corticosteroids. After withdrawal of prednisolone, proteinuria decreased to 3739 mg/day and serum albumin rose to 3.7 g/dL. Taking into account the diagnosis, additional courses of other immunosuppressive agents were not initiated. The patient is currently 37-years old, still under regular Nephrology follow-up, three years after the referral, maintaining a serum creatinine of 0.8 mg/dL, proteinuria of 3500-4000 mg/day, serum albumin >3.5 g/dL and controlled arterial hypertension, without any other abnormalities. Additionally, she is on supportive treatment with losartan and dietary recommendations since the beginning of the follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The differential diagnosis of nephrotic-range proteinuria, with or without associated nephrotic syndrome, is broad, and, therefore, a systematic approach is recommended. In our patient, the absence of symptoms suggestive of systemic disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus or amyloidosis, which are responsible for approximately 30% of nephrotic syndromes observed in adults,3 pointed towards a primary kidney disorder. The most frequent primary kidney diseases responsible for nephrotic syndrome in adults are minimal change disease, FSGS and membranous nephropathy, although other entities (IgA nephropathy or infection-associated glomerulonephritis) can seldom present with a nephrotic phenotype.4 The absence of serum anti-PLA2r antibodies reduced the degree of suspicion for membranous nephropathy, although it could not be excluded. In cases of suspected podocytopathy, histological examination is necessary to further elucidate about the underlying pathological mechanism. The FSGS lesions documented in light microscopy, in the context of the presented clinical picture, provided enough evidence to establish the diagnosis of FSGS, but that is not the final step in the diagnostic evaluation of such patients.

Differential diagnosis between different forms of FSGS is importante for therapeutic and prognostic reasons, and may be aided by electron microscopy and clinical/analytical abnormalities. The findings on light microscopy do not allow the diagnosis of a particular form of FSGS, but the evaluation of the extent of podocyte foot process effacement is possible with electron microscopy.5 While this lesion is diffuse in primary FSGS, it tends to be more limited in secondary forms of FSGS.6

Also, the clinical presentation of patients tends to differ between primary and non-primary forms of FSGS, with the former presenting more frequently with full-blown nephrotic syndrome and marked proteinuria, while secondary FSGS is more often suggested by progressively increasing proteinuria and declining kidney function.7,8 The clinical presentation in patients with genetic FSGS is widely variable, as it may manifest in early infancy with nephrotic syndrome or later in adulthood with progressive chronic kidney disease and less severe proteinuria.5

Most patients with childhood-onset genetic FSGS have autosomal recessive mutations with full penetrance, commonly presenting with nephrotic syndrome.9 Adult-onset genetic FSGS is more frequently associated with autosomal dominant inheritance and variable penetrance,10 as suggested by the family pedigree (see Fig. 1). In our patient, two variants were identified in the NPHS2 gene:

• c.686G>A, p.(Arg229Gln), identified in exon 5, which has been reported as a risk factor for kidney disease when combined with a pathogenic variant in exons 7 and 8 of the NPHS2.1,11 This single-nucleotide polymorphism causes a missense protein and is frequent in population databases [ClinVar - ID: 5370, Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD); Minor allele frequency (MAF) in Genome Aggregation Database (GnomAD) of3%];

• c.855_856del, p(Arg286Thrfs*17), identified in exon 7, is a rare variant reported previously in patients with FSGS presenting with nephrotic syndrome.12-14 It is infrequent in population databases [ClinVar - ID: 188823, HGMD; MAF GnomAD of 0.0071%], only described once in compound heterozygosity with c.686G>A, p.(Arg229Gln) mutation.2 This deletion generates a premature stop codon and is classified as probably pathogenic [American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) 2015/Association for Clinical Genomic Science (ACGS) 2019: PVS1_str, PM1, PM2, PM3_sup].

The NPHS2 gene (OMIM 604766) codifies for podocin, a transmembrane protein found exclusively in glomerular podocytes, important in the recruitment of nephrin to the slit diaphragm, firstly identified in families with autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS).15 NPHS2 mutations are usually associated with early onset of disease and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within the first decade,14 but our patient did not present any symptoms or abnormalities during infancy or adolescence. A paper from the Mayo Clinic reported two siblings with the same compound heterozygote mutation as our patient. Despite sharing the same genotype, one presented with full nephrotic syndrome and diffuse foot process effacement, while the other presented with subnephrotic proteinuria with only partial foot process effacement. This may be due to the intricate interaction between genotype, environment and certain epigenetic phenomena, leading to drastically different phenotypes.16

Resistance to glucocorticoid therapy, while also possible in primary FSGS, is frequent in patients with monogenic forms of FSGS, particularly children.5 Glucocorticoid resistance in adults with genetic FSGS is less certain, and a small subgroup may respond to therapy, even if lasting complete remissions are scarce.17 Mutations in the NPHS2 gene are usually resistant to immunosuppression, but there are reports of response in heterozygous mutations.5 Our patient was initiated on corticosteroid treatment due to the findings of FSGS lesions in light microscopy while waiting on the result of electron microscopy and genetic testing. Taking into account the results of both studies and the lack of response to therapy, we suspended the corticosteroids to avoid iatrogenic complications. There are other treatment options used for primary FSGS, such as calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab, but response to immunosuppression in patients with genetic FSGS is rare.5 These were discussed with the patient, but taking into account the potential adverse effects of these agents, the absence of nephrotic syndrome and the profound immunosuppression during the coronavirus pandemic, no additional therapeutic agentes were initiated.

Another factor to consider is the prognostic importance of genetic testing and counseling in genetic FSGS identifying a genetic cause for FSGS has a tremendous impact in the patient’s management, as it not only allows the avoidance of the toxicity of immunosuppression, but also affects the evaluation for kidney transplantation. In this matter, genetic FSGS compares favourably to primary FSGS, since the former recurs in 0%-8% and the latter in 30%-70% of patients.18-21 Additionally, there are reports suggesting a good prognosis in patients with genetic FSGS caused by NPHS2 mutations.21 Identifying a genetic form of FSGS is also important for living donation, as it should prompt a screening of family members who are potential donors, since there are reported cases of FSGS development in the donors’ remaining kidney.22

CONCLUSION

We describe a case of genetic FSGS caused by a rare combination of NPHS2 variants in compound heterozygosity, providing further insight about the diagnostic evaluation of patients with FSGS lesions on kidney biopsy. Although genetic FSGS is not a frequent diagnosis, it should be suspected in individuals with nephrotic-range proteinuria/nephrotic syndrome, family history of kidney disease and FSGS lesions in kidney biopsy, especially if resistant to immunosuppression.

Although patients with NPHS2 gene variants are usually resistant to immunosuppression, kidney transplant appears to be a good option with a low rate of recurrence.

References

1. Rood IM, Deegens JKJ, Lugtenberg D, Bongers EM, Wetzels JF. Nephrotic Syndrome With Mutations in NPHS2: The Role of R229Q and Implications for Genetic Counseling. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73:400-3. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.06.034. [ Links ]

2. Tory K, Menyhárd DK, Woerner S, Nevo F, Gribouval O, Kerti A, et al. Mutation-dependent recessive inheritance of NPHS2-associated steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Nat Genet. 2014;46:299-304. doi: 10.1038/ng.2898. [ Links ]

3. Malafronte P, Mastroianni-Kirsztajn G, Betônico GN, Romão JE Jr, Alves MA, Carvalho MF, et al. Paulista Registry of glomerulonephritis: 5-year data report. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:3098-105. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl237. [ Links ]

4. Haas M, Meehan SM, Karrison TG, Spargo BH. Changing etiologies of unexplained adult nephrotic syndrome: a comparison of renal biopsy findings from 1976-1979 and 1995-1997. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;30:621-31. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90485-6. [ Links ]

5. De Vriese AS, Sethi S, Nath KA, Glassock RJ, Fervenza FC. Differentiating Primary, Genetic, and Secondary FSGS in Adults: A Clinicopathologic Approach. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29:759-74. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017090958. [ Links ]

6. Hommos MS, De Vriese AS, Alexander MP, Sethi S, Vaughan L, Zand L, et al. The Incidence of Primary vs Secondary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Clinicopathologic Study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:1772-81. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.09.011. [ Links ]

7. Sethi S, Zand L, Nasr SH, Glassock RJ, Fervenza FC. Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis: clinical and kidney biopsy correlations. Clin Kidney J. 2014;7:531-7. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfu100. [ Links ]

8. Kambham N, Markowitz GS, Valeri AM, Lin J, D’Agati VD. Obesity-related glomerulopathy: na emerging epidemic. Kidney Int. 2001;59:1498-509. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0590041498.x. [ Links ]

9. Trautmann A, Bodria M, Ozaltin F, Gheisari A, Melk A, Azocar M, et al. Spectrum of steroidresistant and congenital nephrotic syndrome in children: the PodoNet registry cohort. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10:592-600. [ Links ]

10. Fervenza FC. A patient with nephrotic-range proteinuria and focal global glomerulosclerosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1979-87. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03400313. [ Links ]

11. Tsukaguchi H, Sudhakar A, Le TC, Nguyen T, Yao J, Schwimmer JA, et al. NPHS2 mutations in lateonset focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: R229Q is a common disease-associated allele. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:1659-66. doi: 10.1172/JCI16242. [ Links ]

12. Schapiro D, Daga A, Lawson JA, Majmundar AJ, Lovric S, Tan W, et al. Panel sequencing distinguishes monogenic forms of nephritis from nephrosis in children. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34:474-85. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy050. [ Links ]

13. Mann N, Braun DA, Amann K, Tan W, Shril S, Connaughton DM, et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing Enables a Precision Medicine Approach for Kidney Transplant Recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30:201-15. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018060575. [ Links ]

14. Boute N, Gribouval O, Roselli S, Benessy F, Lee H, Fuchshuber A, et al. NPHS2, encoding the glomerular protein podocin, is mutated in autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Nat Genet. 2000;24:349-54. doi: 10.1038/74166. [ Links ]

15. Fuchshuber A, Jean G, Gribouval O, Gubler MC, Broyer M, Beckmann JS, et al. Mapping a gene (SRN1) to chromosome 1q25-q31 in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome confirms a distinct entity of autosomal recessive nephrosis. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:2155-8. [ Links ]

16. Lepori N, Zand L, Sethi S, Fernandez-Juarez G, Fervenza FC. Clinical and pathological phenotype of genetic causes of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11:179-90. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx143. [ Links ]

17. Ashraf S, Kudo H, Rao J, Kikuchi A, Widmeier E, Lawson JA, et al. Mutations in six nephrosis genes delineate a pathogenic pathway amenable to treatment. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1960. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04193-w. [ Links ]

18. Carraro M, Caridi G, Bruschi M, Artero M, Bertelli R, Zennaro C, et al. Serum glomerular permeability activity in patients with podocin mutations (NPHS2) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:1946-52. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000016445.29513.ab. [ Links ]

19. Pelletier JH, Kumar KR, Engen R, Bensimhon A, Varner JD, Rheault MN, et al. Recurrence of nephrotic syndrome following kidney transplantation is associated with initial native kidney biopsy findings. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018;33:1773-80. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-3994-3. [ Links ]

20. Hickson LJ, Gera M, Amer H, Iqbal CW, Moore TB, Milliner DS, et al. Kidney transplantation for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: outcomes and response to therapy for recurrence. Transplantation. 2009;87:1232-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31819f12be. [ Links ]

21. Weber S, Gribouval O, Esquivel EL, Morinière V, Tête MJ, Legendre C, et al. NPHS2 mutation analysis shows genetic heterogeneity of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and low posttransplant recurrence. Kidney Int. 2004;66:571-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00776.x. [ Links ]

22. Conlon PJ, Lynn K, Winn MP, Quarles LD, Bembe ML, Pericak-Vance M, et al. Spectrum of disease in familial focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int. 1999;56:1863-71. [ Links ]

Received: December 09, 2022; Accepted: January 08, 2023

Corresponding Author: Luís Leite de Sousa Nephrology Department, Hospital de Santa Cruz Avenida Prof. Dr. Reinaldo dos Santos, 2790-134, Carnaxide, Portugal Email: lmsousa@chlo.min-saude.pt

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License