SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número1In-hospital and one-year mortality among patients with acute kidney injury and hematological malignanciesThe role of incremental peritoneal dialysis among patients on peritoneal dialysis. A longitudinal analysis over 20 years índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Portuguese Journal of Nephrology & Hypertension

versão impressa ISSN 0872-0169

Port J Nephrol Hypert vol.35 no.1 Lisboa mar. 2021  Epub 31-Mar-2021

https://doi.org/10.32932/pjnh.2021.04.112 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Prognostic value of lymphocyte cell ratios in peritoneal dialysis

Roberto C. Marques1 

Eduarda C. Carias1 

Ana T. Domingos1 

Anabela M. Guedes1  2 

Idalécio Bernardo1 

Pedro L. Neves1  2 

1Nephrology Department - Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve, Faro, Portugal

2Department of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine - University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal


ABSTRACT

Background:

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been introduced as useful inflammatory markers to predict the outcome of a wide spectrum of diseases, such as malignancies and cardiovascular pathologies. Limited evidence is available for their role in end-stage renal disease and dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate NLR and PLR as predictors of mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

Methods:

In this retrospective study 122 incident PD patients between 2004 and 2019 were included. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Relationships between NLR, PLR and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were evaluated by Spearman correlation test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to determine the association of NLR and PLR with all-cause mortality.

Results:

Mean levels of NLR and PLR were 3.99±2.6 and 195.5±101.7, respectively. Both NLR and PLR were significantly and positively correlated with serum hs-CRP levels (r=0.340, p<0.001 and r=0.360, p<0.001, respectively). The overall mortality rate was 18.9% after a mean follow-up of 30.2±24.0 months. On multivariable modeling, we found that higher NLR (HR=1.662, 95%CI 1.117-2.472) and higher PLR (HR=1.010, 95%CI 1.004-1.015), in addition to lower residual renal function and higher Charlson comorbidity index were significant independent predictors of poor survival, when adjusted for nutritional status.

Discussion:

In this study, NLR and PLR were validated as inflammatory markers and predicted survival in our PD patients. Our results suggest that NLR might be a better indicator of mortality than PLR.

Key-words: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; inflammation; mortality

INTRODUCTION

Chronic inflammation plays an important role in the development and progression of various chronic conditions and diseases such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic obstructive lung disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD)1-3. Patients with CKD tend to have elevated levels of inflammatory mediators, which accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis, the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in CKD4. In addition to known conventional indicators of inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and several interleukins, studies have shown that neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), readily available biomarkers calculated from complete blood count (CBC), are also increased during inflammation and have been used as prognostic factors in cardiovascular and oncologic diseases5,6.

Recent studies have indicated that NLR and PLR offer a plausible strategy in clinical practice for evaluation of inflammation in endstage renal disease (ESRD) and may predict mortality among patients with CKD, including hemodialysis patients7-10. However, their prognostic value in PD is still unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate NLR and PLR as predictors of all-cause mortality in PD patients.

METHODS

Study population

We retrospectively examined data from all ESRD patients aged ≥18 years who initiated PD at the Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve from January 1, 2004 to April 30, 2019 and who had a peritoneal equilibration test (PET). They were treated with continuous ambulatory PD or automated PD. Patients were followed up from the first date of dialysis until death, kidney transplantation, loss to follow-up or the date of final follow-up assessment for all patients (April 30, 2019).

Clinical and biochemical data at the time of PET were recorded, including age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), pre-albumin as marker of nutritional status, normalized glomerular filtration rate (nGFR) and presence of diabetes mellitus. Blood samples for CBC and biochemistry panels were collected for each patient early in the morning before the first exchange of day and immediately analyzed in our hospital laboratory. For CBC analysis, an automatic blood counter was used.

NLR was calculated using neutrophil count divided by lymphocyte count whereas PLR was calculated using platelet count divided by lymphocyte count, both obtained from the same automated blood sample. Weekly Kt/V urea was determined by adding renal Kt (24-hour urine urea nitrogen content/serum urea nitrogen) and peritoneal Kt (24-hour dialysate urea nitrogen content/serum urea nitrogen) normalized to the patient’s estimated urea distribution volume (V).

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages, and continuous parametric variables as mean and standard deviations (SD). Normal distribution was checked using skewness and kurtosis. Correlations between NLR, PLR and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were evaluated using the Spearman correlation test.

Adjusted survival curves were estimated using the Cox average method. A backward elimination procedure based on likelihood ratio was then carried out to remove superfluous variables from the model until the most parsimonious model was identified. Data were analyzed using the software package Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) 23.0 for Windows. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

A total of 164 incident patients started PD during the study period, but only 122 had a PET and were included. The mean age and CCI was 55.0±17.5 years and 5.0±2.5 respectively, of whom 54.9% were ale, 93.4% were caucasian and 31.1% were diabetic. PETs were performed within the first 4.9±7.2 months and the mean follow-up was 30.2±24.0 months. During this period of follow-up, 52 (42.6%) patients were transferred to long-term hemodialysis, 21 (17.2%) received kidney transplants and 3 (2.5%) dropped out of the cohort. A total of 22 (18%) patients died during the course of the study. Our population was dialyzed with a mean Kt/V 2.75±0.94 and a mean creatinine clearance 101±43.3L/week/1.73m2, and the mean evaluated parameters were nGFR 6.7±4.7 ml/min/1.73m2, prealbumin 39.3±113 mg/dL, hs-CRP 10.99±14.97mg/L, neutrophils 5.6±2.5x10^9/L, lymphocytes 1.8±2.3x10^9/L, and platelets 269.6±86.5x10^9/L. Corresponding values for NLR and PLR were 3.99±2.6 and 195.5±101.7, respectively. Patients’ demographic, clinical and laboratory features are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic, clinical and laboratory features of the study group 

Parameter PD PATIENTS (N = 122)
Age, years 55.0 ± 17.5
Male gender, n (%) 67 (54.9%)
Caucasian, n (%) 114 (93.4%)
Diabetic, n (%) 38 (31.1%)
Renal diagnosis (%)
Diabetic nephropathy 24.6%
Chronic glomerulonephritis 17.2%
Hypertensive nephrosclerosis 9.0%
Other / Unknown etiology 49.2%
CCI 5.0 ± 2.5
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.3 ± 1.9
Absolute neutrophil count (x109/L) 5.6 ± 2.5
Absolute lymphocyte count (x109/L) 1.8 ± 2.3
Absolute platelet count (x109/L) 269.6 ± 86.5
NLR 3.99 ± 2.6
PLR 195.5 ± 101.7
hs-CRP (mg/L) 10.99 ± 14.97
nGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) 6.7 ± 4.7
Pre-albumin (mg/dL) 39.3 ± 113
D/P creatinine ratio 0.6 ± 0.12
Creatinine clearance (L/week/1.73m2) 101.3 ± 43.3

Values are means ± SD, unless specified otherwise. CCI = Charlson comorbidity index; NLR = neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR = platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; hs-CRP = high sensitivity C-reactive protein; nGFR = normalized glomerular filtration rate; D/P creatinine ratio = dialysate to plasma creatinine ratio.

Association between NLR, PLR and hs-CRP levels

PLR was significantly and positively correlated with serum hs-CRP levels (r=0.360, p<0.001). Similarly, NLR was also significantly and positively correlated with serum hs-CRP levels (r=0.340, p<0.001).

Mortality Predictability Comparisons of Selected Laboratory Variables

On univariable Cox regression modeling, higher NLR, higher PLR, lower nGFR and higher CCI were significantly associated with risk of overall mortality. Separate models were performed for NLR and PLR associated factors. On both multivariable modeling, higher NLR and higher PLR, in conjunction with lower nGFR and higher CCI were significant independent predictors of poor survival, adjusting for prealbumin levels as a nutritional indicator (Table 2 and Table 3).

Table 2 Multivariable Cox regression analysis for NLR levels showing important predictors for overall mortality in PD patients. 

Independent variables ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
nGFR 0.706 (0.554-0.900) 0.005
Pre-albumin 1.023 (0.974-1.074) 0.365
CCI 1.650 (1.174-2.320) 0.004
NLR (> mean vs. ≤ mean) 1.662 (1.117-2.472) 0.012

nGFR = normalized glomerular filtration rate; CCI = Charlson comorbidity index; NLR = neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio.

Table 3 Multivariable Cox regression analysis for PLR levels showing important predictors for overall mortality in PD patients. 

Independent variables ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
nGFR 0.673 (0.513-0.883) 0.004
Pre-albumin 1.023 (0.977-1.071) 0.332
CCI 1.827 (1.284-2.600) 0.001
PLR (> mean vs. ≤ mean) 1.010 (1.004-1.015) 0.001

nGFR = normalized glomerular filtration rate; CCI = Charlson comorbidity index; PLR = platelet-tolymphocyte ratio.

DISCUSSION

Chronic inflammation is defined as a part of malnutrition-inflammation- atherosclerosis syndrome in patients with CKD and ESRD, leading to a considerable risk of total and cardiovascular death11. In this current study, 18.9% of patients died after a mean of follow-up time of 30 months, indicating a high risk of poor outcome in chronic dialysis patients. Similar outcomes have also been reported by other cohorts of PD patients, which underscores the need for additional parameters for risk stratification in PD patients12.

NLR and PLR, simple ratios obtained from a universally available low-cost complete blood count test routinely performed on admission, have been widely used as biomarkers of systemic inflammation13,14.

Neutrophils may secrete a number of cytokines and activate other immune cells, thus promoting low-grade inflammation in the arterial wall15. On the other hand, studies demonstrated that activated platelets could incite leukocyte recruitment to the vessel wall and trigger the inflammation that can mainly be seen in the pathogenetic mechanism of atherosclerosis16,17. NLR was found to be significantly correlated with inflammatory markers, including CRP, pentraxin-3, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in a population receiving renal replacement therapy18. PLR was also positively correlated with NLR ratio, IL-6 and TNF-α levels. Additionally, ESRD patients with higher PLR values had higher levels of inflammation19. Our study findings were confirmatory to previous studies in regard to positive correlation between NLR and PLR with serum hs-CRP levels20,21.

Catabay C. et al. conducted a large-scale study including 108,548 hemodialysis patients which showed that high NLR value, but not PLR, provided additional benefit in predicting mortality10. Lu X. et al. enrolled 86 patients undergoing PD and suggest that high NLR is independently associated with arterial stiffness and predicts cardiovascular and all-cause mortality22. In our multivariate Cox regression analysis, NLR and PLR were found to be significant predictors of all-cause mortality in PD patients. Furthermore, this relationship was independente of various confounding factors, including CCl, nGFR and pre-albumin.

Our results also showed the excellent predictive value found for CCI and nGFR, in line with preceding evidence23,24. On the other hand, the lower predictive value found for pre-albumin may be related to the high standard deviation of our data.

Several limitations of this study should be considered. First, it was a small-sample observational, retrospective, single-institution study, which only enrolled 122 patients and thus may have weakened the power of some statistical analysis. Second, all the parameters were measured on a single occasion at the time of PET and did not take into account changes over time. Third, we did not look at medical conditions or treatments known to affect the CBC. Nevertheless, we collected data at the time of PET, eliminating possible confounding factors, such as infection, since this condition is a contraindication to perform this test,

according to our unit protocol. Fourth, the current study is a prognostic rather than an etiologic study. Also, we only used serum hs-CRP as na inflammatory marker to correlate with NLR and PLR and, although statistically significant, these correlations are considered weak.

The findings of the present study indicated that baseline NLR and PLR measurements may provide a simple and inexpensive method for predicting mortality in chronic PD patients, when compared with other prognostic markers which may need specific equipment or reagent. Our analysis also suggests that NLR can predict mortality better than PLR in this population. Prospective studies are needed to investigate the potential prognostic impact of those markers.

Authors’ contribution

Authorship of RCM. ECC, ATD and AMG provided clinical assistance, made a substantial contribution to the concept and design of the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content. IB provided clinical assistance. PLN revised it critically for important intelectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript.

References

1. Azab B, Shah N, Akerman M, McGinn JT. Value of platelet/lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of allcause mortality after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2012; 34:326-334. [ Links ]

2. Yao CY, Liu XL, Tang Z. Prognostic role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD. Int J COPD. 2017; 12:2285-2290. [ Links ]

3. Amdur RL, Feldman HI, Gupta J, Yang W, Kanetsky P, Shlipak M, et al. Inflammation and progression of CKD: The CRIC study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 11:1546-1156. [ Links ]

4. Neuen BL, Leather N, Greenwood AM, Gunnarsson R, Cho Y, Mantha ML. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2016; 38:70-76. [ Links ]

5. Sobrino-Márquez JM, Grande-Trillo A, Cantero-Pérez EM, Rangel-Sousa D, Lage-Galle E, Adsuar-Gómez A. Prognostic value of blood panel parameters in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and advanced heart failure. Transplant Proc. 2018; 50:650-652. [ Links ]

6. Thio QCBS, Goudriaan WA, Janssen SJ, Paulino Pereira NR, Sciubba DM, Rosovksy RP, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with bone metastases. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:737-743. [ Links ]

7. Okyay GU, Salih İ, Er RE, Pa Ö, Derici Ü, Erten Y. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in evaluation of inflammation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Ren Fail. 2013; 35:29-36. [ Links ]

8. Ahbap E, Sakaci T, Kara E, Sahutoglu T, Koc Y, Basturk T, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in evaluation of inflammation in end-stage renal disease. Clin Nephrol. 2016; 85:199-208. [ Links ]

9. Yoshitomi R, Nakayama M, Sakoh T, Fukui A, Katafuchi E, Seki M, et al. High neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor renal outcomes in Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease. Ren Fail . 2019; 41:238-243. [ Links ]

10. Catabay C, Obi Y, Streja E, Soohoo M, Park C, Rhee CM, et al. Lymphocyte cell ratios and mortality among incident hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2017; 46:408-416. [ Links ]

11. Bal Z, Bal U, Okyay K, Yilmaz M, Balcioglu S, Turgay O, et al. Hematological parameters can predict the extent of coronary artery disease in patients with end-stage renal disease. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015; 47:1719-1725. [ Links ]

12. Unsal A, Koc Y, Basturk T, Sakaci T, Ahbap E, Sinangil A, et al. Clinical outcomes and mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients: a 10-year retrospective analysis in a single center. Clin Nephrol . 2013; 80:270-279. [ Links ]

13. Altunoren O, Akkus G, Sezal DT, Ciftcioglu M, Guzel FB, Isiktas S, et al. Does neutrophyl to lymphocyte ratio really predict chronic kidney disease progression? Int Urol Nephrol. 2019; 51:129-137. [ Links ]

14. Akboga MK, Canpolat U, Yayla C, Ozcan F, Ozeke O, Topaloglu S, et al. Association of platelet to lymphocyte ratio with inflammation and severity of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Angiology. 2016; 67:89-95. [ Links ]

15. Chen IC, Yu CC, Wu YH, Chao TH. Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts intermediateterm outcomes in patients who have advanced chronic kidney disease with peripheral artery disease receiving percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016; 32:532-541. [ Links ]

16. Uçar FM, Açar B, Gul M, Özeke Ö, Aydogdu S. The association between platelet/lymphocyte ratio and coronary artery disease severity in asymptomatic low ejection fraction patients. Korean Circ J. 2016; 46:821-826. [ Links ]

17. Langer HF, Gawaz M. Platelet-vessel wall interactions in atherosclerotic disease. Thromb Haemost. 2008; 99:480-486. [ Links ]

18. Turkmen K, Guney I, Yerlikaya FH, Tonbul HZ. The relationship between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and inflammation in end-stage renal disease patients. Ren Fail . 2012; 34:155-159. [ Links ]

19. Balta S, Demirkol S, Kucuk U. The platelet lymphocyte ratio may be useful inflammatory indicator in clinical practice. Hemodial Int. 2013; 17:668-669. [ Links ]

20. Yuan Q, Wang J, Peng Z, Zhou Q, Xiao X, Xie Y, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and incidente end-stage renal disease in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease: Results from the Chinese Cohort Study of Chronic Kidney Disease (C-STRIDE). J Transl Med. 2019 ; 17:1-8. [ Links ]

21. Tatar E, Mirili C, Isikyakar T, Yaprak M, Guvercin G, Ozay E, et al. The association of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio with clinical outcomes in geriatric patients with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease. Acta Clin Belgica Int J Clin Lab Med. 2016; 71:221-226. [ Links ]

22. Lu X, Wang S, Zhang G, Xiong R, Li H. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a significant predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018; 43:490-499. [ Links ]

23. Fried L, Bernardini J, Piraino B. Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of outcomes in incidente peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001; 37:337-342. [ Links ]

24. Shemin D, Bostom AG, Lambert C, Hill C, Kitsen J, Kliger AS. Residual renal fuction in a large cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients: change over time, impact on mortality and nutrition. Perit Dial Int. 2000; 20:439-444. [ Links ]

Received: October 10, 2020; Accepted: December 28, 2020

Correspondence to: Roberto C. Marques, MD Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Algarve, Faro - Portugal E-mail: rcmarques@chalgarve.min-saude.pt

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest:

none declared

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License